I have a question I would like to ask. I don't mean to sound rude in anyway, I have just not followed a case of this nature before.
Many of us will remember our President with the woman....she had his DNA on her garment, sealing that case.
My question, since these changes stem from some time back, if they have no "evidence" I am trying to understand how they establish guilt .
I assume the prosecution establishing the character of the women involved is key.
Want to comment on his "fair jury" issue. I firmly believe there are people who can and will serve on a jury and be fair. I have had jury duty, listened to court instructions and took the task as seriously as possible.