So, if I understand this correctly, BC was convicted in part on evidence he admitted to in depositions that were given when he was under the impression he would not be held liable for. So it was truthful what he said, he just did not expect he would be prosecuted for it based on the handshake of a former prosecutor. And while he has been in prison he has refused any treatment for what he had admitted to, or remorse. In effect, he acted as if he had not said those things. And now he is released not based on any truth, but on the technicality of an unwritten agreement that the things he admitted - the truth - would not be used to punish him. So how can he have it both ways. Either it wasn’t the truth when he said those things, so how can any agreement made at that time be binding. Or it was the truth, and he admitted being the sexual predator he was convicted for. This is maddening, and I feel so badly for his victims.
From what I understand, the DA said he would not be charged so he could not plead the 5th amendment during the civil trial. At the tine the DA didn't feel that Crosby would be convicted at trial and the supposed victim would at least get sone justice.
So Cosby couldn't plead the 5th and years (decades?) later was convicted because of it. Thats not justice in America -sorry.