brightii
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2016
- Messages
- 1,141
- Reaction score
- 26
Why was the Crown not allowed to point out the inconsistencies in SS's statements? (ie: he LIED to the police.....) or were they allowed to but chose not to? Or would that have been a "leading" question that is only allowed on cross examination? Colour me confused.....I feel like TD's cross did more for the Crown than the Crown's actual questioning.....MOO
Now that TS has fleshed out many inconsistencies and outright lies in SS's testimony, perhaps the Crown will come on stronger with him when they question SS again after lunch? IMO, the Crown's case is trying to prove that both DM and MS are guilty as charged, so I don't know how they'll proceed with SS this afternoon, but it may get interesting, IMO.
Also, I think the fact that TD did not go after JV or SH on the stand as he did with SS, adds credibility to their testimony. I hope the jury will notice that difference and assess their witness statements given under oath accordingly, IMO.
All MOO.