Horrible crime and such a tragedy.
Just joined WS, but following for a while. I've been wondering about that: it seems that they each had a gun, so where is the second gun? Were there actually 2 guns in the toolbox? DM texted '2' back in response to the MH question about guns didn't he? Did MS actually bury 2 guns? If not wouldn't the police have found a second one in one of the searched properties?
other things I'm wondering about:
- it seems to be a common theory that MS was driving the Yukon on the evening of the murder. Why is that? Couldn't it have been DM driving it? Any clues either way?
- I think the murder was planned and both knew in advance, but I agree with the posters who said that they could have originally been planning to force TB out of the truck at the farm (to avoid crime scene in the stolen truck)
- if they had gone ahead with an assault on IT during the first test drive, how would they have carried it out? It was during daylight hours (in a more populated area) and further from the farm. In that case wouldn't they have had to attack him in broad daylight in the truck?
- I assume that more of the gang besides MS could have realized that DM's crimes were escalating beyond just theft. E.g. I'm sure that SS knew more and maybe (likely?) CN. The incinerator could only have had a sinister purpose (this proves long-term planning of evil acts by DM and I assume it was used with LB?).
- who amongst the friends would believe that a truck would be stolen following a test drive? Wouldn't they have just stolen it at night if theft was the goal? To a thief would showing your face to the victim be worth it in exchange for verifying the operability of the truck in a test drive? Wouldn't it cause suspicion if a truck for sale was stolen after a test drive (while owner is away or asleep)? I'm Asking not because I think this was intended but because DM would need to be confident that the non-insiders would 'buy-in' to the theft idea (as SS pretended to do with the talk that DM 'bought' a hot truck)
- why did DM keep the murder weapon(s) initially after the murder? Why not convince MS to take them immediately if he wanted to frame him if necessary (maybe he was so confident of his invincibility that he wanted to retain them for the next 'mission'?
- was TB shot before or after they retrieved the Yukon? Good theories by posters that the Yukon driver was 'clean' and therefore TB was shot after MS and DM retrieved the Yukon, but I think it is a risky move for a driver to try to shoot a passenger at close quarters in the front seat. E.g. a desperate/brave victim could try to grab the gun arm. Maybe that's what happened and the shooter got the shot off fast, but it is a risky move for a shooter and I'm not sure that DM or MS would risk it. I would think that they wanted both to be present during the shooting to make sure that the victim could not turn the tables on a single assailant.
- they could have tried to order TB out of the truck, intending to restrain him with tape, retrieve the Yukon, and then bring him to the farm to murder him (as someone suggested) but he fought back at this stage before they could force him out of the truck? Maybe but wouldn't most people cooperate with a gunman, thinking that cooperation would get them released?