IMO it's not a hoax.
If it isn't a hoax, it would be considered child




IMO
Linda, why can't we consider the possibility that it is a somewhat-disguised videotape of child exploitation, or, as you say, " child




"? I was careful not to use the words " child




", and used " child exploitation." I think there might be a slight difference in that the child shown was NOT a boy.. but the distinction is not mine to make.
The implications of abuse
or exploitation are there for the following reasons:
The girl's faces were readily shown, they are recognizable through their appearance and their voices, and the parent's names are given. The abnormal breastfeeding was simulated in close up detail, and then the finished ( scripted) product was put on the Internet for the WORLD to see. The world is not just you, me, and the other people at WS who fight pedophiles. The world includes every pedophile with an Internet connection.
These parents have opened their daughters lives up to incredible scrutiny not only by people like us, but by pediphiles the world over.
NO ONE is that naive. The video was made for disturbing reasons which are at extreme odds with the girls' normal internal growth and development stages. I do not know the specific reason the video was made, but I defintely do not think it was to show the benefits of school age girls simulating breastfeeding on camera.
Much more is implied slightly beneath the surface, at the expense of the children. IMO.
Maria