Britney kicks out loser

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #281
GoldenGoose said:
she`s taking an awful long time to kick this guy out :woohoo:
Yep, he still seems to be in her life doesn't he?

If they tried going to see a movie together recently and made a scene, the next we'll hear is that they're on a romantic vacation somewhere and making a scene. :laugh:
 
  • #282
Tom'sGirl said:
LOL......here's another one of her taken the same day! You must not Google very well..........and by the way, she's wearing make-up in the prior photo, just didn't have the "zit" cover on I guess!
britneysmoking.jpg
I guess it must be her or she'd be suing whoever published the pics. However I can only imagine the reason there is a market for "stars without their makeup" type pics is so that envious women can quell their feelings of inadequacy.
 
  • #283
Frankly, I think it kind of disgusting to spend so much time on their lures and/or lack of lures. I always need a shower after looking at threads about Britany. It is like a low level of child abuse. Simmering below the surface with something to be replaced shortly. In fact, I don't know why I even posted except that maybe some of you will relate. She has a homerun that she is the only one on the team.
 
  • #284
Tom'sGirl said:
It was more than the butts & booz........

Her contract stipulated that her physical appearance not change, so Garland was prescribed amphetamines to "control" her weight and barbiturates to sleep. Addicted to the drugs, which caused hallucinations and suicidal tendencies, her behavior became erratic and disruptive. In 1949, she was electroshocked. Her drug-induced health problems worsened, her liver and spleen massively swollen. In 1969, Garland died of a psychiatric drug overdose in a London hotel.

http://www.cchr.org/index.cfm/9184
I recently saw a holiday special with Judy Garland, & Liza & Lorna when they were very young. Judy fell down on TV during the dance number, and Liza was helping her up. Keep in mind this was before Alcoholism was considered a disease. I just felt really sorry for all of them. And even as messed up as Judy was, she was obviously really drunk or something, I still thought she sang like an angel.
 
  • #285
  • #286
She's looking truly, truly awful, IMO.

Yikes! :eek: :eek: :eek: Doesn't look like taking Fed-x back is doing much for her looks.
 
  • #287
I think ya'll are in for a hell of a surprise. That girl can, at times, look skankier than anyone I've ever seen, but she can also look incredible and she will again.
 
  • #288
Jeana (DP) said:
I think ya'll are in for a hell of a surprise. That girl can, at times, look skankier than anyone I've ever seen, but she can also look incredible and she will again.

Hey! if there's hope for her, there's hope for me! :woohoo:

i look forward to seeing her get herself together after the pic above! :truce:

but i'm doubtful . . .

http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1365321.jpg
 
  • #289
I am sure if anyone followed me around with a camera when I was mere months post-partem, they would have captured sandraladeda at her fattest, ugliest, bags-under-eyes-exhausted, and dressed not too stylishly either! Nor would I have cared that much, as I was too busy being madly in love with each of my beautiful babies to give a rats azz about how I looked (however, ahem, I did return to my high standard of drop-dead gorgeous eventually....:rolleyes: )

Remember too, that Hollywood stars are very good at looking good on camera, yet they look like regular folks when not professionally made up, and not seen through a filtered lens, or in an air-brushed photo.

I remember back in the heyday of Knot's Landing, when Donna Mills was the gorgeous, sexy babe on the show. I used to spend some time in Palm Desert, Ca., and spotted her in the Safeway store a couple times. I walked past her several times, in complete disbelief that this plain, old-looking, pasty-faced woman was the same one who played the vixen Abby on Knot's Landing! :eek:

With the right makeup, camera, lighting, etc. we could all look like Faith Hill!
 
  • #290
sandraladeda said:
I am sure if anyone followed me around with a camera when I was mere months post-partem, they would have captured sandraladeda at her fattest, ugliest, bags-under-eyes-exhausted, and dressed not too stylishly either! Nor would I have cared that much, as I was too busy being madly in love with each of my beautiful babies to give a rats azz about how I looked (however, ahem, I did return to my high standard of drop-dead gorgeous eventually....:rolleyes: )

Remember too, that Hollywood stars are very good at looking good on camera, yet they look like regular folks when not professionally made up, and not seen through a filtered lens, or in an air-brushed photo.

I remember back in the heyday of Knot's Landing, when Donna Mills was the gorgeous, sexy babe on the show. I used to spend some time in Palm Desert, Ca., and spotted her in the Safeway store a couple times. I walked past her several times, in complete disbelief that this plain, old-looking, pasty-faced woman was the same one who played the vixen Abby on Knot's Landing! :eek:

With the right makeup, camera, lighting, etc. we could all look like Faith Hill!
While I agree with most of what you said, the fact remains that Britney just turned 24. Donna Mills was in Knots Landing from age 38-47, big age difference.
 
  • #291
Jeana (DP) said:
I think ya'll are in for a hell of a surprise. That girl can, at times, look skankier than anyone I've ever seen, but she can also look incredible and she will again.
I think she can get it back if she will dump the loser and start focusing on her career. Having both a child and career can be done...even if it is hard. I don't know if she can have a baby, career, and try to keep tabs on her loser husband though. I guess time will tell. I do know stress can be a killer on your looks. You know trying to keep him from screwing up and spending all her money has got to be a full time job within itself! I do hope she will put her baby first and do the right thing....whatever that might be.
 
  • #292
sandraladeda said:
I am sure if anyone followed me around with a camera when I was mere months post-partem, they would have captured sandraladeda at her fattest, ugliest, bags-under-eyes-exhausted, and dressed not too stylishly either! Nor would I have cared that much, as I was too busy being madly in love with each of my beautiful babies to give a rats azz about how I looked (however, ahem, I did return to my high standard of drop-dead gorgeous eventually....:rolleyes: )

Remember too, that Hollywood stars are very good at looking good on camera, yet they look like regular folks when not professionally made up, and not seen through a filtered lens, or in an air-brushed photo.

I remember back in the heyday of Knot's Landing, when Donna Mills was the gorgeous, sexy babe on the show. I used to spend some time in Palm Desert, Ca., and spotted her in the Safeway store a couple times. I walked past her several times, in complete disbelief that this plain, old-looking, pasty-faced woman was the same one who played the vixen Abby on Knot's Landing! :eek:

With the right makeup, camera, lighting, etc. we could all look like Faith Hill!
Gosh! I always thought DM was beautiful. :confused: I can't believe she is plain looking off camera.:(
 
  • #293
deandaniellws said:
I think she can get it back if she will dump the loser and start focusing on her career. Having both a child and career can be done...even if it is hard. I don't know if she can have a baby, career, and try to keep tabs on her loser husband though. I guess time will tell. I do know stress can be a killer on your looks. You know trying to keep him from screwing up and spending all her money has got to be a full time job within itself! I do hope she will put her baby first and do the right thing....whatever that might be.
I agree with the stress factor, but LifeStyle also plays a very big role!
 
  • #294
Floh said:
She's looking truly, truly awful, IMO.

is there any way back to superstardom from this? :loser:

http://static.sky.com/images/pictures/1365315.jpg
I still will NEVER understand why she can't AT LEAST keep her roots covered! That is just nasty looking. Her hair never looks clean anymore. Not taking care of your hair is just being lazy. IMO
 
  • #295
deandaniellws said:
Gosh! I always thought DM was beautiful. :confused: I can't believe she is plain looking off camera.:(
Being born in 1942 I'd imagine you'd really not recognize her now!
 
  • #296
Tom'sGirl said:
I agree with the stress factor, but LifeStyle also plays a very big role!
Agreed!:doh:
 
  • #297
sandraladeda said:
I am sure if anyone followed me around with a camera when I was mere months post-partem, they would have captured sandraladeda at her fattest, ugliest, bags-under-eyes-exhausted, and dressed not too stylishly either! Nor would I have cared that much, as I was too busy being madly in love with each of my beautiful babies to give a rats azz about how I looked (however, ahem, I did return to my high standard of drop-dead gorgeous eventually....:rolleyes: )

Remember too, that Hollywood stars are very good at looking good on camera, yet they look like regular folks when not professionally made up, and not seen through a filtered lens, or in an air-brushed photo.

I remember back in the heyday of Knot's Landing, when Donna Mills was the gorgeous, sexy babe on the show. I used to spend some time in Palm Desert, Ca., and spotted her in the Safeway store a couple times. I walked past her several times, in complete disbelief that this plain, old-looking, pasty-faced woman was the same one who played the vixen Abby on Knot's Landing! :eek:

With the right makeup, camera, lighting, etc. we could all look like Faith Hill!

Sorry, I could never in a million years have looked like Faith Hill. Nor Britney for that matter. I did perhaps look a bit like Jane Fonda, or Sally Field maybe. You know, dirty dishwater brown hair, boring hazel eyes, flat 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬, pale skin, nice teeth.

I will never look like a blonde with blue eyes, but I've got dynamite legs and toosh. You just have to appreciate what attributes you've got; and at my age, well, nice pedicure. :rolleyes:
 
  • #298
Tom'sGirl said:
Being born in 1942 I'd imagine you'd really not recognize her now!
That is not old! :slap:
 
  • #299
Marthatex said:
Sorry, I could never in a million years have looked like Faith Hill. Nor Britney for that matter. I did perhaps look a bit like Jane Fonda, or Sally Field maybe. You know, dirty dishwater brown hair, boring hazel eyes, flat 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬, pale skin, nice teeth.

I will never look like a blonde with blue eyes, but I've got dynamite legs and toosh. You just have to appreciate what attributes you've got; and at my age, well, nice pedicure. :rolleyes:
Sally fields is as cute as a button! I think she still is.:angel:
 
  • #300
Marthatex said:
Sorry, I could never in a million years have looked like Faith Hill. Nor Britney for that matter. I did perhaps look a bit like Jane Fonda, or Sally Field maybe. You know, dirty dishwater brown hair, boring hazel eyes, flat 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬, pale skin, nice teeth.

I will never look like a blonde with blue eyes, but I've got dynamite legs and toosh. You just have to appreciate what attributes you've got; and at my age, well, nice pedicure. :rolleyes:
I have always thought that jane fonda and sally field were very pretty, and speaking of faith hill, did anyone see her today on oprah, she is absolutely beautiful.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
2,536
Total visitors
2,631

Forum statistics

Threads
632,157
Messages
18,622,790
Members
243,039
Latest member
Gumshoe132
Back
Top