Brooke Bennett, 12 yrs. old Randolph, VT #9

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
Didn't someone in LE say that he couldn't state it was a homicide...which surprised me really. Oh, I know they're awaiting autopsy results, but you can't visually see that there was foul play involved?


Foul play indeed, intentional murder? Yet to be determined. Remember, it's only truly "murder" if you *intend* to kill the person.
 
  • #222
Reading all of this just turns my stomach. I've been trying to catch up and I know I've missed some things and hope you go easy on me when I ask where was Brooke's mother? I have a 12 yr old dd and I would never let her go anywhere to visit a friend in a hospital w/o having more information. I would have had to personally talk to the friend's mother and I surely wouldn't let her uncle just drop her off. I know the mother is hurting and I'm not blaming her, just wondered if this has been brought up in the previous pages?
 
  • #223
Hmmmm, maybe gthe SOB got the money for his sex machine from good ol George W's stimulus plan....



LOL! OK- you're funny! I liked that...:clap:
 
  • #224
AR seemed to be very isolated and very dependent on pleasing MJ which could explain her reluctance and lying to LE.

Very good theory! Makes sense! I've only just tarted going thru the affidavit so I hadn't seen the bit suggesting to AR her possible replacement.
 
  • #225
i drove by the houses yesterday and it looks like it has people living here, I didnt see any "vacant" houses anywhere near his house. There were still ALOT of police cars there at the house too.
 
  • #226
I had another thought. The first thing the media does is show either live footage or taped footage of someone in this type of case. As far as Raymond Gagnon goes, we've seen nothing but a sketch. I bet there' a reason LE isn't releasing his face yet.

Some of the cases I've seen where they didn't immediately show a photo of the suspect, was because LE was attempting to find witnesses who saw that person. They don't want to contaminate the witnesses with his picture everywhere.

IF the perps picture was all over the media, the defense could say the person saw his picture on tv. Whereby if there's no available photo of him, they can use his mug shot in a photo line-up.

At least that's my personal explanation.

Could be,
fran
 
  • #227
i drove by the houses yesterday and it looks like it has people living here, I didnt see any "vacant" houses anywhere near his house. There were still ALOT of police cars there at the house too.

Thanks bdmama for the info. So if the rental was occupied where did he keep all of his stuff? His wife must have noticed if he kept it at home.
 
  • #228
I wouldn't be able to look at the child 🤬🤬🤬🤬 to be of any help, but when I read your post, I had to comment that I'm scared sometimes just clicking on people's MySpaces and related links!!

Anything illegal on Myspace or similar public site run by a major company would get shut down pretty quickly. They have a vested interest in keeping illegal material out lest they get legally charged for hosting it or linking from it.
 
  • #229
Jacques impregnated his 15-year-old relative in 1985 and he was charged with that. The charge of lewd and lascivious conduct was dropped.
I wonder if the girl had the child.
That was said again this morning on WCAX.

Respectfully,
dark_shadows
 
  • #230
Interesting. I never thought of that. I did wonder why she would willingly go upstairs with him. It really looked like she did not trust him (in the convenience store video). She had her arms crossed (like a self-protective mode); and she kind of stepped away from him.

I still wonder if it was more frustration due to delays in getting to the "party". Remember, we're talking about a young girl, not an adult. Different reactions and mannerisms.

What I don't understand is why AR never questioned why they had to lie to Brooke and deceive her about some boy and some party. Why didn't they use the "Breckenridge" scam on her??

Simple, they knew her, so they'd know what she'd fall for. Also- she was older than AR was when he dragged her in.
 
  • #231
Very good theory! Makes sense! I've only just tarted going thru the affidavit so I hadn't seen the bit suggesting to AR her possible replacement.


Thankyou! LOL--there's alot to read and wade through for sure. But that one quote really struck me and I couldn't shake it. The quote about the "committee doesn't like you too much!"

Also there's a new article on foxnews.com that there is no evidence supporting a wider sex ring involving any other girls.
 
  • #232
That relative of his that he raped was his own sister...not sure if she had the baby or not, adn I do not know her name right off hand but I can find out!
 
  • #233
Okay, after finishing watching megan on the oreilly factor just now, with the male commentator and reading through half of the affidavits and posts to date. Things are changing like zip zap zoop so fast in this case it's absolutely astonishing, never have I ever seen one un-fold with the twists, turns and available evidence as in this case. It's unprecedented.

Jacques was grooming, lying, molesting and raping juvenile 1 since the age of 9 years old and is now 14 years old, being a five year time span. Through this entire time, he has lied to her under the premise that she was a part of a government sex ring, in which she had to be initiated into by criminal methods unbeknowest to her. Jacques continued the lying, grooming, raping as he continued to story growing it more and more over time.

He began contacting her via phone calls, e-mails and in person claiming to be working with the government and others whom she's never met personally but knew Jacques as he is a real blood line relative, (yuck). For five years he has lied. Raped and used her body for his evil devices.

Over time, the step father became aware of such activities, got involved in the 🤬🤬🤬🤬, raping lying and molesting of her also. So we now have two grown men doing these horrid things to her.

She acquires an age appropriate boyfriend in this time frame, acting out inappropriately sexually with this BF naturally as that's all she's practically ever known. The lie of the government sex ring continued to grow and pilferate to this point in time when Jacques in my opionion grew bored and tired of just her and his wife, his videos, and 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 images, and more likely than not molesting other children, but not to this degree of forcible rape.

He then wants Brooke. Brooke wouldn't comply, or Brooke became aware and threatened to rat them out, some kind of threat Brooke imposed, or he wanted her and she wouldn't give in and threatened to tell. So he talks juvenile 1 into helping her get brooke to his sex dungeon and he raped, tortured and murdered her. Juvenile according to her affidavit didn't see brooke after she got her to the sex dungeon of Jacques house, she sat and watched tv, then left at jazcques command to go.

So all of it all this time was and is a lie. This juvenile 1 thought for five years she was a participant member chosen and passed the test of being in a study. Being so young, she didn't know better. I can't believe she never confided in not one soul, not one soul that would have questioned her or others involved and got to the bottom of this atrocity.

Then we have stepfather. He claims to have had sex, (he raped her) with juvenile 1, had 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 images per his affidavit, but hadn't harmed Brooke, just help dispose of evidentuary property in the case.

So Juvenile was used and abused for nought, in her eyes, for this was all a made up sick fantasy by Jacques who isn't a part of some big foreign sex snuff sex tape ring for hire to get rich on your lazy evil back. It was a scheme to take what he saw he wanted, and felt entitled too.

Where the Hell is the mothers in this? There ain't no way in Betsies (insert any cuss word you can imagine) they didn't see something, know something. Have red flags, radars, hinky meters going off. Ain't no way they didn't have an opportunity to know something.

Who was doing the laundry at juvenile 1 house? Her, all by herself for the entire family all these years? I doubt that. Ain't no dog on way. The physiological changes that had to occur prematurely in this young child was within itself red flags and evil hinky meters going off. How was she kept from becoming pregnant? Hello! Somebody help me please! I'm about to drive down to vermont and slap the BS and foolishness out the faces of Jacques wife, oh yes, she ain't that blind dumb, and some mothers. Hell, I'm even gonna slap the damn dog. Cuz his butt's in trouble with me too. It goes against nature.

The smells, languages, eye contacts, behaviors, habits, positioning of furniture, videos, electronics and oh yes, the money trails, follow them please!!!!! And I want to know where the monies were coming from in juvenile 1 life? Her mother should and did see this, where would she get money to buy herself certain things that we know any 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14 year old would be buying with their hush hush secret evil dirty money.

Burn filth burn.

:furious::furious::furious::furious::furious::furious::furious::furious:
 
  • #234

Wow! That's some statement.

Why didn't this person put that type of thing on his probation report? Or did he?

Vermont definitely needs to clean up their act.:mad:

fran
 
  • #235
Jacques impregnated his 15-year-old relative in 1985 and he was charged with that. The charge of lewd and lascivious conduct was dropped.
I wonder if the girl had the child.
That was said again this morning on WCAX.

Respectfully,
dark_shadows

OMG DS that is disgusting. I still can't believe this guy was running around loose.
 
  • #236
It says he ritired in 2002, Jacques wasnt released from probabtion until 2006.
 
  • #237
Wow! That's some statement.

Why didn't this person put that type of thing on his probation report? Or did he?

Vermont definitely needs to clean up their act.:mad:

fran

Agreed fran vermont really needs to change the way they handle sex offenders.:furious:
 
  • #238
How do you clear the history on your computer?

your browser will have a drop-down at the top of the window that says "History", or "Internet Applications", I think, for Internet Explorer . Firefox has "Clear Private Data" under "Tools" (not sure for Netscape as I haven't used that browser in years). It'll have a clear history, clear cookies and possibly other features for clearing- fields, cache, etc. On many systems, the admin may still have access if you clear it, tho, as there would still be a record of where you went on the server.
 
  • #239
I thought he also had more than just that one additional property. She was found on a different property of his...correct?

So, just how much does this 🤬🤬🤬 own? :furious: REALLY raises the red flag about where this money was coming from.
 
  • #240
VT defnitely needs to change the laws. I got a phone call from the cheif of police in Randolph a year ago asking me to come to the station so he could show me apic of RSO living in my neighborhood. 27 convictions in 13 different states, not one of them VT so he wasnt listed on the VT registry. Chief said to me "if you are a sex offender, come to VT, we'll hide your 🤬🤬🤬 because you cant be on the SOR if you havent been convicted in this state".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
105
Guests online
3,367
Total visitors
3,472

Forum statistics

Threads
632,618
Messages
18,629,160
Members
243,220
Latest member
JJH2002
Back
Top