- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 6,974
- Reaction score
- 14,974
Bumping.
CA CA - 29 Palms, WhtFem UP2467, 15-35, shallow grave at mining claim, Dec'70
- Thread starter kpdx
- Start date
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Messages
- 5,411
- Reaction score
- 26,889
Jacqueline Ann Gasperian? The heights a little off but everything else seems to fit.
It says Jane Doe wore a partial upper denture and had auburn hair. Jaqueline is blonde. I don't think it's a match.
- Joined
- May 20, 2021
- Messages
- 5,411
- Reaction score
- 26,889
Jaqueline is a redhead according to Namus. I also wouldn't rule out the possibility of Jaqueline having a denture that isn't mentioned in namus
Charley Project notes that "Gasperian was a heavy smoker at the time of her disappearance and had heavy tar buildup on her teeth." So I guess it would make sense if she had a denture. But I feel like if the tar buildup was that noticeable it would have been noted in the namus entry.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 6,974
- Reaction score
- 14,974
Twenty-Nine Palms Jane Doe has been unidentified for 52 years today.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 6,974
- Reaction score
- 14,974
Twenty-Nine Palms Jane Doe has been unidentified for 53 years today.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2015
- Messages
- 6,974
- Reaction score
- 14,974
Twenty-Nine Palms Jane Doe has been unidentified for 54 years today.
Jane Doe's NamUs page, #UP2467, was created on August 26, 2008 and last updated October 8, 2019. There are four MP exclusions on her NamUs page: she is definitely not Mary Corrine Amos or Cindy Lee Mellin. The remaining two exclusions on Jane Doe's NamUs profile are not properly linked to a NamUs page. One of them is Ann Bernice Duncan, who went missing in 1969; however, Ann's name was not entered properly in Jane Doe's exclusion list, so it doesn't link back to Ann's page. Furthermore, Jane Doe is not featured on Ann's exclusion list. However, they are almost certainly still rule-outs, as Mary Bell once said in a personal email, "Unfortunately, listing NamUs exclusions is not a high priority. We get exclusions all the time that never show up on the NamUs exclusion list."
The remaining rule-out on Jane Doe's list is for "Garee Gasperian." I considered it possible that this was intended to be Jacqueline Gasperian, who went missing in July 1970; however, Jacqueline is not known to have ever used the name Garee. Because of this, I submitted Jacqueline Gasperian as a potential match to the Doe Network, which replied that to their knowledge no comparison had been done between the two before, so DN's panel would take a look at it.
On June 13, 2025, I received confirmation from Mary Bell of the Doe Network that the match between Jane Doe and Jacqueline Gasperian had already been ruled out.
[note: i simply copied&pasted this section from my own write-up on Jane Doe, hence it's low key overly-formal wording lol]
The remaining rule-out on Jane Doe's list is for "Garee Gasperian." I considered it possible that this was intended to be Jacqueline Gasperian, who went missing in July 1970; however, Jacqueline is not known to have ever used the name Garee. Because of this, I submitted Jacqueline Gasperian as a potential match to the Doe Network, which replied that to their knowledge no comparison had been done between the two before, so DN's panel would take a look at it.
On June 13, 2025, I received confirmation from Mary Bell of the Doe Network that the match between Jane Doe and Jacqueline Gasperian had already been ruled out.
[note: i simply copied&pasted this section from my own write-up on Jane Doe, hence it's low key overly-formal wording lol]
