Found Deceased CA - Alycia Yeoman, 20, Gridley, 30 March 2017 #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #501
CA LE is not going to bust anyone for smoking pot or 20 yo for drinking...worst case LE would drive her home or call a cab...let alone show up at someone's home unless it was after 11 and there was a "disturbing the peace" complaint
 
  • #502
Does the heel size look narrow to anyone? Maybe not a tennis shoes print.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

Looks like the prints from the wedge heel boots I'm wearing right now. I'm a pretty small person and have sunk deep walking in soggy ground.
75312c3c691501c4b32912ddd287d599.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #503
These are the most telling, IMO. Couple of things here. 1.) Kind of hard to tell size without a comparable item, like a dollar bill or ruler. 2.) The depth, however, leads me to believe that is not from a petite girl. 3.) I would suspect that these particular ones I quoted are farther from the truck, and are more defined. If you are carrying someone through mud, your first few steps as you're getting them out of the car would be a bit uneasy, causing skidded footprints. This one appears clear, as if they'd had their footing by this point. 4.) There isn't a whole lot of definition to the tread pattern, and the shape makes me think either flip-flop, or some kind of sandal, not a name brand tennis shoe, boot, etc. 5.) <modsnip> 6.) I'm still not sure on the ex-bf, but I almost feel like the scene of the abduction or whatever may have happened is that field near Walmart, as the perp would have tossed the phone (on the way out of the party), done whatever happened, drove the car to the spot it was dropped off, called someone to come pick him/her up, realized his mistake later, drove back, got the phone, and chucked it drive-by style near the location.

All imoo, but that's what I've got so far. You've got the 37 year old who says he walked her out, I just feel like something more than that happened in the driveway.

Sent from my 2PYB2 using Tapatalk

I tend to disagree on the sandal/flip-flop assessment. If you were in mud like this with a shoe that was not strapped to your foot like a tennis shoe, it would be pulled off your feet and you would end up barefoot. I have seen people lose tennis shoes and hiking boots in deep mud like this too. Tread patters also are not well defined in deep mud. The sucking of the mud tends to distort the pattern.
 
  • #504
  • #505
Here's what I've been thinking: Given her age/appearance, at first glance, one would assume the most likely scenario is that she was kidnapped for sex trafficking. That being said, sex traffickers don't generally go out of their way to ditch their victim's vehicle, etc. Typically they just alter their appearance and ship them off. Even if someone had been watching her and this was premeditated I think they wouldn't have bothered because they would have had a plan to disappear her quickly and it wouldn't matter when/where the truck was found. Aly has been described as a responsible young woman who held two jobs and attended Yuba College...this is not someone who I would assume is out partying uncontrollably on the regular. At this point I think that there's a high probability that this was a coverup gone bad for an accident. She was upset, maybe she drank more than she normally would or experimented with with other substances and overdosed or maybe fell and hit her head and expired. The others were probably in various states of intoxication and panicked. Here they were with a dead minor (in terms of drinking age) on their hands and they could be held responsible... Someone went to dump her body. Someone else tried to get rid of the truck and got stuck. They probably didn't realize her phone wasn't in the truck or on her person like maybe it was in the couch or something and after it was announced that LE had a ping from the phone near Walmart (which is coincidentally near the house) they searched more thouroughly, and the phone was then tossed drive by style near the abandoned truck which would explain why the phone pinged in YC but was ultimately found near the truck. The homeowner left on his scheduled tour because well that was what he'd being doing anyway and they would want to be keeping up normal appearances. The time given for when she left the house is clearly not possible given the time stamp on the surveillance video in the orchard. They wouldn't have known there were cameras and therefore wouldn't be able to give a more accurate time for when she supposedly left.

If she really did leave the house and the ex/boyfriend's comment about her using back roads is true then I think it's pretty unlikely that she would have become lost given that she has lived in this area her whole life. Even if she had been intoxicated, subconsciously her brain would have been on autopilot and while maybe she'd exhibit poor driving, she probably would have made the correct turns. If she did choose to drive after drinking, being that she seems fairly responsible, I like to think that she wouldn't have had too much to drink to begin with or would have waited until she sobered up before driving and that is also why they would have allowed her to leave. But the location of the truck does not make much sense for a person who was headed home because she had work early the next morning... <modsnip> The footprints to me do not immediately remind me of a specific shoe. I think this was just a bad attempt to cover up a horrific accident and if this is what happened then person(s) responsible for covering it up should just come forward and tell the truth because it will bring closure to a lot of people.
 
  • #506
CA LE is not going to bust anyone for smoking pot or 20 yo for drinking...worst case LE would drive her home or call a cab...let alone show up at someone's home unless it was after 11 and there was a "disturbing the peace" complaint

I totally agree. CA cops have bigger fish to fry.
 
  • #507
Not necessarily...it depends where the other vehicle stopped, or possibly even another person was waiting and was watching for the lights and the driver and person #2 walked back to a second vehicle. I haven't watched the video in a few days but if I am not mistaken the blinker was on the whole time...even if it wasn't, there is also a possibility a second vehicle was waiting. People obviously need vehicles to get to and from that area, and whoever walked away from there got picked up in one. Where is that on the security camera?

I believe if there was a second vehicle that went down Comey and up on that levee, it would be on the security camera. There's enough light it would show even without headlights. There are two other videos from the farmer's home showing the truck drive right in front of the house, it's in the comments on the first video, posted by the farmer. He has three cameras on that road. If someone tiptoed down that street, on foot, his cam would have recorded it. JMO
I believe there was another car but it picked up the truck driver on Pennington road, at the other end of the levee by the park.
Unless the truck driver walked to a home nearby, there are many, one nearby home has a mean looking RSO living there.
The other possibility is the truck driver had a getaway car parked nearby.
Or they could of brought a bike in the back of the truck, google estimates I can ride a bike from Pennington Rd to Yuba City in 51 minutes.
JMO
 
  • #508
Here's what I've been thinking: Given her age/appearance, at first glance, one would assume the most likely scenario is that she was kidnapped for sex trafficking. That being said, sex traffickers don't generally go out of their way to ditch their victim's vehicle, etc. Typically they just alter their appearance and ship them off. Even if someone had been watching her and this was premeditated I think they wouldn't have bothered because they would have had a plan to disappear her quickly and it wouldn't matter when/where the truck was found. Aly has been described as a responsible young woman who held two jobs and attended Yuba College...this is not someone who I would assume is out partying uncontrollably on the regular. At this point I think that there's a high probability that this was a coverup gone bad for an accident. She was upset, maybe she drank more than she normally would or experimented with with other substances and overdosed or maybe fell and hit her head and expired. The others were probably in various states of intoxication and panicked. Here they were with a dead minor (in terms of drinking age) on their hands and they could be held responsible... Someone went to dump her body. Someone else tried to get rid of the truck and got stuck. They probably didn't realize her phone wasn't in the truck or on her person like maybe it was in the couch or something and after it was announced that LE had a ping from the phone near Walmart (which is coincidentally near the house) they searched more thouroughly, and the phone was then tossed drive by style near the abandoned truck which would explain why the phone pinged in YC but was ultimately found near the truck. The homeowner left on his scheduled tour because well that was what he'd being doing anyway and they would want to be keeping up normal appearances. The time given for when she left the house is clearly not possible given the time stamp on the surveillance video in the orchard. They wouldn't have known there were cameras and therefore wouldn't be able to give a more accurate time for when she supposedly left.

If she really did leave the house and the ex/boyfriend's comment about her using back roads is true then I think it's pretty unlikely that she would have become lost given that she has lived in this area her whole life. Even if she had been intoxicated, subconsciously her brain would have been on autopilot and while maybe she'd exhibit poor driving, she probably would have made the correct turns. If she did choose to drive after drinking, being that she seems fairly responsible, I like to think that she wouldn't have had too much to drink to begin with or would have waited until she sobered up before driving and that is also why they would have allowed her to leave. But the location of the truck does not make much sense for a person who was headed home because she had work early the next morning... <modsnip> The footprints to me do not immediately remind me of a specific shoe. I think this was just a bad attempt to cover up a horrific accident and if this is what happened then person(s) responsible for covering it up should just come forward and tell the truth because it will bring closure to a lot of people.

I agree, this is the most likely scenario, IMO
 
  • #509
Did they say if the footprints went to the river or to the road?

There is no official release where the footprints went.
I can't find anything on social media saying where they went either.
 
  • #510
Looks like the prints from the wedge heel boots I'm wearing right now. I'm a pretty small person and have sunk deep walking in soggy ground.
75312c3c691501c4b32912ddd287d599.jpg



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, could possibly be hers or a woman's boot like this one. The extended family member (sister in law) posted earlier that ML has a girlfriend and wasn't romantically involved with Aly. Her abducter could be a taller, heavier jealous girl friend of either boy friend.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 
  • #511
Anyone over 21 can grow and smoke legally. You can't buy it or sell it legally yet. You can also give it away. So if she was smoking under 21 and he gave it to her, he could be charged.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

According to the Feds, none of its legal but they are looking for farms with over 100 plants on property with lots of equity or paid off and dealers with huge stashes. The Feds often confiscate all the property, house, cars, boats..and don't even charge the growers. They just take everything and don't waste money on getting a conviction in a CA court.
That being said, CA has hundreds of marijuana dispensaries where one can go in with their medical recommendation for pot, register, and buy pot legally according to CA.
Yuba City has two Pot dispensaries and a delivery service.
Pot or alcohol on its own, with a 20 year old, isn't going to get much of a reaction out of CA cops, IMO, although some counties and towns are stricter than others.
 
  • #512
I don't believe any law enforcement would charge kidnapping against someone not allowing someone over the limit to drive.

So a 37 year old male can restrain a 20 year old female against her will and as long as the male tells LE that she was drunk then he is in the clear? If the male commits battery on the female in order to get her keys does that mean he didn't commit a crime because he was only keeping her from driving drunk?

I'm not sure how illegal acts can be legal simply because of good intentions. JMO
Battery

The Act The act must result in one of two forms of contact. Causing any physical harm or injury to the victim—such as a cut, a burn, or a bullet wound—could constitute battery, but actual injury is not required. Even though there is no apparent bruise following harmful contact, the defendant can still be guilty of battery; occurrence of a physical illness subsequent to the contact may also be actionable. The second type of contact that may constitute battery causes no actual physical harm but is, instead, offensive or insulting to the victim. Examples include spitting in someone's face or offensively touching someone against his or her will.
Touching the person of someone is defined as including not only contacts with the body, but also with anything closely connected with the body, such as clothing or an item carried in the person's hand. For example, a battery may be committed by intentionally knocking a hat off someone's head or knocking a glass out of some-one's hand.

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/battery
 
  • #513
Time it took today in daytime traffic to go from 1844 Romero to
Tierra Buena Rd to
Larkin to
Pennington
East on Pennington gate to the rec area,
then
back one road to the first through road, Metteer over to Cooley Rd and east to the Levee at the end of Cooley Rd by the Farmers house.

I recorded the drive. I'm uploading to youtube, and I will post a link
5c0fe9c0edd1d7296fb1ce0211b1677b.jpg
5b12b4e3ad2fcf725f1b9050f19828be.jpg
7b813a8d42e636f2ad67dc8ed3345693.jpg


Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 
  • #514
So a 37 year old male can restrain a 20 year old female against her will and as long as the male tells LE that she was drunk then he is in the clear? If the male commits battery on the female in order to get her keys does that mean he didn't commit a crime because he was only keeping her from driving drunk?

I'm not sure how illegal acts can be legal simply because of good intentions. JMO


http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/battery

If someone beats someone up to stop them from driving I think cops would and should arrest them but if she called 911 and said he took her keys and wouldn't let her leave and was holding her against her will and they got there and she registered as under the influence, unharmed but upset, I don't think the cops would arrest the person protecting her from driving inebriated.
I've stopped many people from driving drunk and never gotten physical or been charged.
I've never heard a case of such a charge and I'm old.
 
  • #515
According to the Feds, none of its legal but they are looking for farms with over 100 plants on property with lots of equity or paid off and dealers with huge stashes. The Feds often confiscate all the property, house, cars, boats..and don't even charge the growers. They just take everything and don't waste money on getting a conviction in a CA court.
That being said, CA has hundreds of marijuana dispensaries where one can go in with their medical recommendation for pot, register, and buy pot legally according to CA.
Yuba City has two Pot dispensaries and a delivery service.
Pot or alcohol on its own, with a 20 year old, isn't going to get much of a reaction out of CA cops, IMO, although some counties and towns are stricter than others.
That was before recreational marijuana passed in November. There are a bunch of new regulations but anyone over 21 can grow it, have it and smoke it without any interference from authorities.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 
  • #516
  • #517
That was before recreational marijuana passed in November. There are a bunch of new regulations but anyone over 21 can grow it, have it and smoke it without any interference from authorities.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk

I didn't know anything had went into effect, all the clubs in the Bay Area still require medical papers to enter.
 
  • #518
The shoe appears to be flat bottomed rubber sole, no defined heel or star pattern tread like you'd see on a work boot or ridged pattern like a sneaker. They look female to me.
 
  • #519
I didn't know anything had went into effect, all the clubs in the Bay Area still require medical papers to enter.
Yes, you can't buy it or sell it without a medical card but you can grow it and share it for free.

Sent from my SM-G928P using Tapatalk
 
  • #520
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
1,593
Total visitors
1,657

Forum statistics

Threads
632,538
Messages
18,628,117
Members
243,189
Latest member
kaylabmaree32
Back
Top