This was posted without comment. If we are connecting the dots, do we ascertain that Barb was the 25-35 year old lady mentioned in the affidavit?
These "sniffers" are amazing. The point would be that they would alert on her scent from the point of origin...where she supposedly started from. They aren't picking up anything (from what I understand), thus it puts in to question his rendition that she was even there.
Amateur opinion and speculation
Were the camper and truck recent purchases?
I think there was a picture that showed it to be a Keystone Cougar? (Fifth wheel, not sure if 31 foot)
And a dually truck? Ford?
I know that camper looks brand new, and my dad mentioned a new dually (new toy) in the Thomas garage few weeks back.
It was suggested to me by an actual insider that herbalife is a front for other things, and I don't see why that couldn't be extremely pertinent.
“a deep rabbit hole“ could be exactly what she fell into that day.There is a very detailed, documented and heavily footnoted piece put together by plainsite dot org regarding some Herbalife distributors’ involvement with cocaine and money laundering internationally. Since it’s not MSM I won’t link it. It looks legitimate, but I think it’s a huge reach and a deep rabbit hole to connect Barbara’s disappearance with this issue.
This is a good place to get caught up - just one page so far.I didn't realize this was the 2nd thread...need to go drink more coffee and start reading. This is bizarre case and my "nefarious meter" went on alert after reading the first story. She may have left love notes under his pillow trying to rekindle relationship.
You are right, they are amazing. There are alot of misperceptions about these miracle workers and how terrain/weather (does/does not) effect findings. Here's a good overview:Dogs are amazing, but many times they don’t find a person who’s there to be found. And hot dry weather, which we have here, is considered very bad tracking/trailing weather. So I doubt that we can draw valid conclusions from their not picking up anything—and we don’t know that they didn’t. LE hasn’t said a word, except that they’re using dogs.
It's hard to say whether the photo was taken on the hike or not but LE says they were hiking at 2:30 p.m. How long had they been hiking? Since that morning? Unfortunately, we don't know that or what time they left home.Are you thinking the 360 photo wasn’t taken on the hike? The post said that it captured cars in a parking lot and LE was looking at plate numbers. Where was the parking lot and why was LE interested, I wonder, if the photo wasn’t taken on the hike? Perhaps at another stop they made along the way? Do we know what time they left home and what time they started hiking/walking?
Another question. Do we know if she left her house in the bikini and wore it in the truck on the drive to where they hiked or did she change into it when they stopped? It just seems strange to wear it traveling and she might have been seen wearing something else earlier.
This is a good place to get caught up - just one page so far.
CA - AZ, Barbara Thomas,69,Timelind, Media, Maps, *NO DISCUSSION*
There is a very detailed, documented and heavily footnoted piece put together by plainsite dot org regarding some Herbalife distributors’ involvement with cocaine and money laundering internationally. Since it’s not MSM I won’t link it. It looks legitimate, but I think it’s a huge reach and a deep rabbit hole to connect Barbara’s disappearance with this issue.
“Betting on Zero,” the documentary, which chronicles Ackman’s now-four-year battle against the Los Angeles-based nutritional supplement company had a screening Friday evening at a DC investigative film festival.
The screening was sold out, but festival organizers noticed what it called “an unusual buying pattern” in online sales.
Exactly half of the tickets purchased appeared to be made by ten employees of Heather Podesta & Partners, a DC-based lobbying firm that works with Herbalife.
Those tickets went unclaimed Friday evening, leaving 173 seats unfilled during the film’s screening and its later question and answer portion, which featured the film’s director Ted Braun and Bill Ackman.
“Heather Podesta + Partners’ deliberate attempt to thwart an interested DC audience from seeing our documentary seems like another step by Herbalife to avoid the serious questions raised by the film and the recent FTC settlement, and to prevent the public from seeing ‘Betting On Zero,’” Braun said in a statement.
Fusion GPS bills itself as a corporate research firm, but in many ways it operates with the secrecy of a spy agency. No sign marks its headquarters above a coffee shop in Northwest Washington. Its website consists of two sentences and an email address. Its client list is closely held.
The small firm has been under intense public scrutiny for producing the 35-page document known as the Trump dossier. Senior executives summoned to testify before Congress in October invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, and the firm is resisting a congressional subpoena for bank records that would reveal who has paid for its services.
But hundreds of internal company documents obtained by The Washington Post reveal how Fusion, a firm led by former journalists, has used investigative reporting techniques and media connections to advance the interests of an eclectic range of clients on Wall Street, in Silicon Valley and in the nation’s capital. The firm has played an unseen role in stories that dominated headlines in recent years.
In the years before it produced the dossier, records show, Fusion worked to blunt aggressive reporting on the medical-device company Theranos, which was later found to have problems with its novel blood-testing technology. It was also hired to ward off scrutiny of the nutritional supplement company Herbalife, which ultimately paid $200 million to distributors to settle claims by regulators.
Marking my spot again.....I need to find myself an avatar of a dog with a fire hydrant....moo
See, that's the thing. I don't trust RT's account of the day, whatever he might have told LE. He is telling the public his polygraph results were deceptive per what he says LE told him. His wife is gone and there is possibly suspicious dealings with him as I understand it. My ears are certainly perked up! I'm not sure what to think right now, but I'm not going to simply believe the last admitted known person to see her before she vanished. Something is unknown here and I'm quite disturbed by it.It's hard to say whether the photo was taken on the hike or not but LE says they were hiking at 2:30 p.m. How long had they been hiking? Since that morning? Unfortunately, we don't know that or what time they left home.
We also don't know if they started on the hike immediately after they parked alongside the road. They could have sat there and had lunch first or something.
We are missing so many details.MOO
Admitting that one's polygraph was deceptive is not conducive to triggering belief in other accounts. You are so right. JMOSee, that's the thing. I don't trust RT's account of the day, whatever he might have told LE. He is telling the public his polygraph results were deceptive per LE. His wife is gone and there is possibly suspicious dealings with him as I understand it. My ears are certainly perked up! I'm not sure what to think right now, but I'm not going to simply believe the last admitted known person to see her before she vanished. Something is unknown here and I'm quite disturbed by it.
I wonder what an anonymous allegation about Herbalife smuggling drugs 34 years ago has to do with this case?If the above Herbalife Information is true, is that why RT knew that BT was kidnapped and taken to Vegas?
OR
Were there other people in the Desert with them that day? Something went wrong, and that could be why a deception was shown on the lie detection test.
Both situations would clear RT from being responsible for her disappearance but would put him in a situation not to be able to tell everything that really happened that day.
We don't know that he has done anything.
In the interview I saw, he gets emotional as he is talking about her and seems to stop talking because he is about to cry.
It's a natural reaction to look down or hide your face when one cries, especially when in front of a camera knowing millions of people could be watching.
If he had started openly blubbering and rambling incoherently everyone would probably accuse him of faking it. Imo