cazador
Well-Known Member
We have not heard a word is an under statement ..
I can understand the criticism of RT, to a point, for not calling her family right away after she went missing.
Many of us probably shape our opinions based on our own views and experience.
I would be very upset if my husband called my parents right away if I could not be located on a outdoor outing/hike.
Would my parents want to know right away? Yes. But them knowing in the frenzy of information gathering and resources being pulled together would serve zero purpose but to cause panic. They would be in the way and have a thousand questions that could not be answered. I love them dearly but that’s how I feel when S hits the fan. No way would I call my in-laws right away either. The less people in the mix initially, the better. That’s ok if that makes me a jerk or whatever.
In many cases lost hikers, explorers, (whoever) who go missing are found. Hopefully it’s a neat story to tell everyone after the dust settles.
So, I don’t come down on him for this. People who are clear thinkers in most situations, can be the opposite under a stressful situation such as this. I have seen people come unhinged and not even remember the kind of car the spouse drives. Outlandish theories galore.
We also don’t know who else RT called. We don’t really know much about BT. Maybe he called a family member or dear friend of hers immediately. Who knows. But he did call 911 in a reasonable amount of time. All my opinion.
But have you considered it the other way around and thought about how you would feel if your 69-year-old mother had been missing for 6 days and nobody called you? Or if your sister had been missing for 4 days and you were just informed? MOOI can understand the criticism of RT, to a point, for not calling her family right away after she went missing.
Many of us probably shape our opinions based on our own views and experience.
I would be very upset if my husband called my parents right away if I could not be located on a outdoor outing/hike.
Would my parents want to know right away? Yes. But them knowing in the frenzy of information gathering and resources being pulled together would serve zero purpose but to cause panic. They would be in the way and have a thousand questions that could not be answered. I love them dearly but that’s how I feel when S hits the fan. No way would I call my in-laws right away either. The less people in the mix initially, the better. That’s ok if that makes me a jerk or whatever.
In many cases lost hikers, explorers, (whoever) who go missing are found. Hopefully it’s a neat story to tell everyone after the dust settles.
So, I don’t come down on him for this. People who are clear thinkers in most situations, can be the opposite under a stressful situation such as this. I have seen people come unhinged and not even remember the kind of car the spouse drives. Outlandish theories galore.
We also don’t know who else RT called. We don’t really know much about BT. Maybe he called a family member or dear friend of hers immediately. Who knows. But he did call 911 in a reasonable amount of time. All my opinion.
Well, not since we heard he was hanging around at the casino, anyway.We have not heard a word is an under statement ..
Heh, heh heh....^^^Well, not since we heard he was hanging around at the casino, anyway.
Yes, but the source of all that information is still the VI, just as the source for the pictures of Barbara in the desert is the VI.
That was the point that I thought was being made.
So no matter what LE said or what the neighbors said, the source remains the same. Imo
Page 37 of Thread #7 has some conversation about the convenience store stop, for those who didn't catch it.Ah, okay. Makes sense. And then Dbdb posts about his call here (including that LE contacted clerk).
We know that Dbdb does speak to the detective from time to time, though.
I’m pretty disappointed though, that the clerk tip comes from SM. People like to insert themselves into cases, especially online. So we don’t really know for sure that LE went and got video from that store. I think it’s likely the clerk saw RT that day, but I am now not so certain that LE really went out there or had contact with this person.
There have been several people on SM who turned out to be either unreliable or not actually able to report from personal experience in the manner that they did on Twitter. IOW, they were embellishing. MOO.
I can understand the criticism of RT, to a point, for not calling her family right away after she went missing.
Many of us probably shape our opinions based on our own views and experience.
I would be very upset if my husband called my parents right away if I could not be located on a outdoor outing/hike.
Would my parents want to know right away? Yes. But them knowing in the frenzy of information gathering and resources being pulled together would serve zero purpose but to cause panic. They would be in the way and have a thousand questions that could not be answered. I love them dearly but that’s how I feel when S hits the fan. No way would I call my in-laws right away either. The less people in the mix initially, the better. That’s ok if that makes me a jerk or whatever.
In many cases lost hikers, explorers, (whoever) who go missing are found. Hopefully it’s a neat story to tell everyone after the dust settles.
So, I don’t come down on him for this. People who are clear thinkers in most situations, can be the opposite under a stressful situation such as this. I have seen people come unhinged and not even remember the kind of car the spouse drives. Outlandish theories galore.
We also don’t know who else RT called. We don’t really know much about BT. Maybe he called a family member or dear friend of hers immediately. Who knows. But he did call 911 in a reasonable amount of time. All my opinion.
Nevertheless, one's conclusion can only be subjective.The trick to winning “Family Feud,” is to figure out the answer that most people would give.
Not the answer that we would give; not the right answer.
Likewise, when I look at someone’s behavior, I don’t necessarily think about how I would behave in a certain situation.
I think about how most people would behave.
Nevertheless, one's conclusion can only be subjective.
None of us is "most people".
I thought the platform that we heard about the LL in the casino came from our VI?Which is also from another platform than MSM or LE.
There’s a quite a bit of stuff in the non-MSM/non-LE bucket. I don’t think we’re supposed to discuss it here, though. It’s very hard to keep it all straight.
Nevertheless, one's conclusion can only be subjective.
None of us is "most people".
Nevertheless, one's conclusion can only be subjective.
None of us is "most people".
The trick to winning “Family Feud,” is to figure out the answer that most people would give.
Not the answer that we would give; not the right answer.
Likewise, when I look at someone’s behavior, I don’t necessarily think about how I would behave in a certain situation.
I think about how most people would behave.
I’m bothered here. You call the family, no matter what the relationship to them is like.
That’s what most people would do.
That being said, I don’t believe this is foul play because of his words or actions. That doesn’t move the needle much, or certainly not enough to reach a conclusion.
Instead, I believe this is foul play because of the totality of the circumstances.
A short walk, and a disappearance into thin air.
No proof she was ever there, or atleast at the time she was claimed to be.
The words of law enforcement, and the fact they felt compelled to administer a polygraph.
The nature of the terrain, the proximity to the road, and the visible reference markers.
BBM:So well said. And if a person is too distraught to deal with calling Spouse’s son, then that person asks one of their own family (such as the daughter who was interviewed in the Las Vegas broadcast) to make the calls. Or ask any friend or neighbor. Or cold call a minister (they specialize in that kind of thing). I’ve had family members do all of the above, such that the distraught person’s daughter’s husband made the calls.
This is another one where there’s some stuff in the SM bucket.
It’s possible that RT delegated this duty to someone else, who didn’t follow through for reasons.
Yes, of course! That would be quite a way for his nephew to travel!Heh, heh heh....^^^
I think that was RT hanging out at the "Lizard's Lounge"; and not the VI.
Tbh, maybe RT would rather socialize at places he feels comfortable at ?
It's not like he's going to be bothering the police or the media all the time. That would get tiresome ... real fast. *sarcasm intended*
Imo.
Yes, it had to be here because I have never read about the case anywhere else. There were many posts about it, including detailed descriptions of what the place is like and what it has to offer for both kids and adults. ImoI thought the platform that we heard about the LL in the casino came from our VI?
Yes, of course! That would be quite a way for his nephew to travel!
I was thinking maybe he felt comfortable there, too, or that he just didn't want to be home because it just reminded him of his wife.
I remember the VI's sister saying he couldn't even handle reading the news because it was just too much. Imo