CA- Body (IDd as Celeste Rivas Hernandez) found in vehicle at Hollywood tow yard, abandoned Tesla registered to singer D4vd – 8 September 2025 #2

[Telltale]

Hey, now, a journalistically adjacent rag broke the John Edwards sex scandal back in the day.

But seriously, I agree, and we should throw the Daily Mail on the pile while we’re at it.

With the rise of online 'news,' sites setting the bar down in hell. I will give the Daily Mail the smallest of credit. They operate as a legacy newspaper still, i.e they (mostly) don't just cannibalize and regurgitate the same article like a lot of those sites. They have actual reporters that go looking for exclusive new info, angles, sources etc to sensationalise the f*ck out of.

They at least aspire to serve fresh garbage

No luminol?

Owner of home rented by D4vd hires PI to solve Celeste Rivas mystery

Landlord Mladen Trifunovic wasn't even aware D4vd was staying at his $4.1 million mansion until police raided the property in September, as they investigated the death of Celeste Rivas.

www.dailymail.co.uk

‘I have a private investigator gathering information because my family and I want to understand what may or may not have happened in or around a home that is very special to us,’ said Trifunovic.

‘We are not interfering with the LAPD’s investigation; we are simply seeking answers I fear may not be communicated to us unless we use a licensed investigator.’

I have not been told by law enforcement that Celeste died in the house. There are no obvious signs that something happened inside,’ Trifunovic said,

Nobody wants to rent a murder house lol.

They need to get a blacklight out to be sure about the luminal.

Of course if she died/was killed in that house, then there are plenty of ways it could have happened that wouldn't leave obvious traces.

After (we assume) weeks to a month or more, to blur any traces, then the police then D4vds team stripping the house. It would have to be a fairly messy crime scene to be obvious to the at this point.

 

[sunspun]

Is he wearing pants on top of pants? Is this a thing now?

Well, I don't know if you can call that WEARING pants on top of pants... seems to be having a lot of trouble wearing them at all. How does he even walk with the top pair of jeans sliding halfway down his legs??

Yes, I know, they do wear their pants hanging below their waist like that, hanging below their butt even, yep, I've seen it. But I think it has to be maybe the dumbest-looking trend ever, very impractical and looks uncomfortable! But then again, I personally have never tried wearing my pants that way! Who knows, maybe it's no problem... maybe I should try it, what do you think? haha.

 

[Gemmie]

Well, I don't know if you can call that WEARING pants on top of pants... seems to be having a lot of trouble wearing them at all. How does he even walk with the top pair of jeans sliding halfway down his legs??

Yes, I know, they do wear their pants hanging below their waist like that, hanging below their butt even, yep, I've seen it. But I think it has to be maybe the dumbest-looking trend ever, very impractical and looks uncomfortable! But then again, I personally have never tried wearing my pants that way! Who knows, maybe it's no problem... maybe I should try it, what do you think? haha.

Is it a called a trend when it's lasted for decades, nearly half a century? Serious question.

I saw my first pair of what I call droopy drawers in the early 1980s. I was walking behind two guys that wore them. I was puzzled at how they stayed up and then down a pair went to around his knees. He bent over, fully knowing a female was not far behind them, and pulled them back up. It was like purposely flashing his undies.

Ever since I saw that I've always wondered WHY did they like that style? It makes it hard to run or climb fences when you're running from the cops. JMO!

So I find it interesting that that fad, or whatever it's called when it's gone on for this long, is still around. I prefer not having a wardrobe malfunction when I'm out in public, ya know?

 

[PromotedPawn]

Well, I don't know if you can call that WEARING pants on top of pants... seems to be having a lot of trouble wearing them at all. How does he even walk with the top pair of jeans sliding halfway down his legs??

Yes, I know, they do wear their pants hanging below their waist like that, hanging below their butt even, yep, I've seen it. But I think it has to be maybe the dumbest-looking trend ever, very impractical and looks uncomfortable! But then again, I personally have never tried wearing my pants that way! Who knows, maybe it's no problem... maybe I should try it, what do you think? haha.

Please give it a try and let us know how it works out for you.

I think the new trend is very skinny jeans on the young men. I see a lot boys wearing what appear to be jeggings and it looks more uncomfortable than the undies showing style of my youth.

On a more serious note, I hope to see some movement with this case soon. Celeste deserves justice.

 

[HoneyBunOne]

Is it a called a trend when it's lasted for decades, nearly half a century? Serious question.

I saw my first pair of what I call droopy drawers in the early 1980s. I was walking behind two guys that wore them. I was puzzled at how they stayed up and then down a pair went to around his knees. He bent over, fully knowing a female was not far behind them, and pulled them back up. It was like purposely flashing his undies.

Ever since I saw that I've always wondered WHY did they like that style? It makes it hard to run or climb fences when you're running from the cops. JMO!

So I find it interesting that that fad, or whatever it's called when it's gone on for this long, is still around. I prefer not having a wardrobe malfunction when I'm out in public, ya know?

It's inspired by prison wear, believe it or not! If only they knew we all thought they look ridiculous.

Google Search