I noticed a comment on one of the blogs about Levine from a woman in Ethiopia, possibly an educator?
http://www.ldresources.org/2009/03/22/dr-mel-levine-accused-of-sexually-abusing-young-boys/
Post #5. Unfair? To Levine? What about his victims?
So I have an ethics question. Everyone will groan because most don't want to have to answer this. I know I shy away from it.
I have read Levine's work in the past and agree with much of it. I've raised at least two boys who learned differently, while still being bright. One was actually tested for autism back in the late 70s as he didn't speak until he was three--not a word. The first time he communicated he asked, "Mommy, may I have another peach?" with perfect articulation. My husband and I about fell over. I still remember where I was sitting and how my heart stopped. We'd just had our little 42 month old son tested for autism and autism didn't show up. A 157 IQ showed up. I know now that M has some definite Asperger-y tendencies but those really weren't known about in the late 70s. He took apart his baby bed at 9 months. He was building amazing things out of Legos at 18 months. School was a struggle however, and he never connected socially. He couldn't make eye contact and didn't like to be touched.
M is the type of "learner" that Levine cautions us to not humiliate--to celebrate. I happen to agree. A psychiatrist told us when M was 9 that he'd grow into himself by 40. Well, he's 36 and he's a glorious man--quirky as heck--but socially engaged, married, a father, a loving son. A delight. He grew into himself.
So here's the hard question. When we discount Levine and shun him from the education circle, what do we do with his writing? I'd be very interested to hear other's opinions on this sticky subject.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.