- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
- Messages
- 22,509
- Reaction score
- 5,883
I completely agree that we don't have the right to know anything in an open investigation. But I do not think LE should lie to the public. I am always supportive when they say "we are not discussing details of this investigation" (etc). That said, I am only thinking of the media's reporting of this--it may well be that LE was very careful to phrase things appropriately and honestly here, and that media made it sound flip-floppy.
here is a hypothetical situation... (Or maybe not so hypothetical...)...
what if someone involved in a case... Maybe even just,peripherally...and not someone privy to LE's plans of the investigation... Chooses to go before the media and share information with the public that would put the investigation of LE in jeopardy... (For instance motivate a POI to flee... Or ???)...
wouldn't LE have an obligation to somehow diffuse the released information... And possibly to counteract it with untruths (I usually hate that word)... So that Justice can be served?
Just some thoughts...