This page has all the trial days linked to youtube in nice/neat order.
TheMcStayTrial Home/home.html
Isn't it natural, when asked in past tense, to reply in the same, past, tense?
I think you twig immediately if the tense use does not match your own state of mind.
If you ask me 'was your mother a nice person' I would not answer in past tense but be very confused
If you ask me 'was your mother well?' I would answer in past tense because it agrees with my internal world that my last meeting with her lies in the past.
This is not stuff one needs to think about. You answer in the tense that matches your frame of reference.
That is, to a certain degree, true. However, we are talking about a family that suddenly vanished for no apparently reason, where foul play was likely, which, I assume, is not the case when someone asked about your mother (God forbid).
Apart from foul play was not suspected or likely at this stage.
The police thought they had simply gone off.
Sooooo......are you saying it's good or bad that LE use "past tense" in a voluntary interview to "trap" a POI?If so, they would not have questioned CM and used past tense in the questioning (whether because they believed they were dead or because they meant to trap CM).
IMO LE avoids the type of question that specifies tense, in the hope that the POI they are interviewing will fill in that part on their own. For example, "Can you tell me what you were doing the morning of April 1st" or "Do you know John Doe". Their goal is to get the person to discuss their version of the facts and watch for such "tells" as tense, lies and anxiety".Sooooo......are you saying it's good or bad that LE use "past tense" in a voluntary interview to "trap" a POI?
Sooooo......are you saying it's good or bad that LE use "past tense" in a voluntary interview to "trap" a POI?
My post was simply in reply to "foul play was not suspected or likely at this stage", to show that obviously foul play was suspected/likely.
Cornelius has his own blog on the McStay case which we are not allowed to link to here.So who is this Cornelius that seems to be very knowledgeable about everything McStay? No one has any idea?
Yes, LE have their interrogation methods in trying to establish whether a person is being deceptive or not in any given criminal case, and know what signs to look for.IMO LE avoids the type of question that specifies tense, in the hope that the POI they are interviewing will fill in that part on their own. For example, "Can you tell me what you were doing the morning of April 1st" or "Do you know John Doe". Their goal is to get the person to discuss their version of the facts and watch for such "tells" as tense, lies and anxiety".
Cornelius has his own blog on the McStay case which we are not allowed to link to here.
I have no idea, maybe you could ask him?Understand. But who is he? Is information on that blog reliable and why?
I have no idea, maybe you could ask him?
I think at that stage LE were trying to establish where the McStay family were and if they were missing voluntarily or something more sinister had happened to them. I think LE questioning family and friends would be normal procedure, and doesn't necessarily mean that LE didn't think something bad had happened or not. They would be trying to determine all angles, IMO.If so, they would not have questioned CM and used past tense in the questioning (whether because they believed they were dead or because they meant to trap CM).
I do care about Joey's and Summer's family.
I do care that the murderer of this entire family is convicted and placed in an awful living situation for what he has done to this family.