- Joined
- Nov 30, 2013
- Messages
- 13,433
- Reaction score
- 65,684
Which in Celcius is:
High 17.7 C
Low 5.5 C
Sorry, I'm Canadian, I had to google it lol
Thank you on behalf of the rest of the world! C'mon America, get with the programme

Which in Celcius is:
High 17.7 C
Low 5.5 C
Sorry, I'm Canadian, I had to google it lol
I then to agree
I wonder if the murderer has not displayed his guilty knowledge in plain sight here.
He got very agitated and schooled his Attorneys on what "really happened".
But why should he be so excited over this point? I get why it may matter but why this of all things?
Is it because he knows precisely what happened and this is his chance to get one over the State?
LOL I figured I was not the only one here that would need to look it upThank you on behalf of the rest of the world! C'mon America, get with the programme![]()
I have a question please.
As the women on the jury sit and closely listen to CMs interview with LE how do you think they feel about his abnormal vindictiveness he displayed against Summer?
Tia
Jmo
Interesting lol I'm guessing earthwire means a ground wire. I do believe our plugs are grounded by code. Will ask my resident expert tomorrow ;-)
The cord actually helps point to it happening in the home IMO they are very common in households and may have been what was handy.
Actually... I have always thought this happened elsewhere... but where else would they be that would have a cord like that handy, other than a home.. hmmm
ohhh was going to go and listen to the 2nd part of the interview from yesterday ... and it's not uploaded yetdang!
Hi oceanblueeyes! I don't know that the jurors will have the same sensitivity to criticism of Summer as we have developed over these eight long years, so they may not hear "vindictiveness" (yet), but they must find Merritt's words about her distasteful and disrespectful, especially given the circumstances surrounding that interview. In voicing his bad opinion of the wife of his "best friend" at such a sensitive and critical time, Merritt stomps all over our socially acceptable norms and customs, which shows that he doesn't respect Summer, Joey, their marriage, their family, their privacy, LE, the interview process, or what decent people do and say.I have a question please.
As the women on the jury sit and closely listen to CMs interview with LE how do you think they feel about his abnormal vindictiveness he displayed against Summer?
Tia
Jmo
Hello...just started following this trial...above says something about private forum...is this still the discussion forum for this trial? I am very concerned that the wrong man may be on trial...that might be a very preliminary feeling and I will change but something very off with "Mikey"
Since it was Joey, that was bound, the restraining may have taken place at the house or the storage facility. Unfortunately, this doesn’t give us much insight as to where he/they were murdered. However, since an improvised item, an electrical cord was used instead of zip ties suggests that it was not planned or at least things didn’t proceed as planned.Interesting lol I'm guessing earthwire means a ground wire. I do believe our plugs are grounded by code. Will ask my resident expert tomorrow ;-)
The cord actually helps point to it happening in the home IMO they are very common in households and may have been what was handy.
Actually... I have always thought this happened elsewhere... but where else would they be that would have a cord like that handy, other than a home.. hmmm
I think the prosecution’s dwelling upon this evidence creates speculation and hurts their case. As Furiously_Following, has pointed out, it’s not really conclusive of anything, and even if it was, it doesn’t implicate CM. IMO, they should move on to the financials which can be linked directly to CM, and is quite incriminating. Them spending so much time on something that’s not conclusive makes the prosecution’s case look like it’s nothing more than smoke and mirrors, grasping at straws because they really don’t have a case.I've been through various scenarios with regard to the staining on the pants and I've formed the conclusion that I think it is urine and the ammonia component that over the long period had the same effect as bleach. I don't think we can compare clothing or soft furnishings that have been washed soon after their exposure to urine. Someone posted an article yesterday that showed pet urine on carpets has this bleaching effect if it is left uncleaned for a long period.
I think the photo of the pants shows the following:
The urination happened while Summer was in a seated position.
I've ruled out the following positions:
- standing upright, because the urine wouldn't spread upwards and rearwards through the fabric to her buttocks area. Even if she was standing up and then made to sit down the majority of the urine would have gone wherever it would go by gravity and not be sufficient to make the buttocks area upwards behind her so wet.
- lying on her back or front, because the urine wouldn't run down the entire leg, or even drench the whole length of the leg uniformly, it would pool underneath her on the surface she's lying on.
- lying on her side, because there's again no reason for the urine to run down the leg, and again uniformly, it would soak her whole hip area to the ground, and even if it did soak her whole lower leg with her legs pressed against each other the urine would leach from the drenched lower leg fabric into the upper leg fabric at least slightly.
I think she was seated and then the pants have been pulled off her with the right leg pulled inside the seat area and the left leg of the pants coming off without being pulled inside. So the right leg stayed bunched up inside the pants and the urine soaked into the inside leg fabric that remained touching the wet crotch area of the pants.
If I apply this to the bleach theory I can't think how bleach would be applied in a seated position while she was wearing them. Even if she was made to sit in a pool of bleach I don't think that would spread upwards through the back and the front crotch area of the pants so extensively. And I also don't see what would be the purpose because if the purpose of the bleach is to destroy his DNA because she has been raped her pants were already off.
If I were to theorize further I would say she could have been killed in a seated position (and her bladder expelled its contents) in the house but then there would be a wet chair in the house and she would fall off the chair so I don't think she would have been seated long enough for her bladder to expel that much urine before she went to the floor in a different position. Unless she was bound to the chair, with say painters tape. That is a serious possibility IMO.
Another theory would be that she was kept alive somewhere and was seated (perhaps on the ground) and she either urinated through fear just prior to her death, maybe witnessing the other murders, or because she was just held so many hours that she had no choice but to let her bladder empty.
MOO
Photo of the back of the pants - click to enlarge
View attachment 165830
Where is yesterday's footage and what's the deal with today's live stream?
All Fridays are off days.Where is yesterday's footage and what's the deal with today's live stream?
I shouldn't really comment on this yet because I've only listened to a tiny part of the interview at this time, so I will go off the small clip they played during the opening speech, where he was telling them how many times Summer would say 'stop it' to the boys. Boy, IMO, you could hear the nastiness in his voice, and just that part lets me know that she really got under his skin. He comes across as a petty nasty mean gossip with a chip on his shoulder, and I think he is jealous, because he has a need to take from people and demean people.I have a question please.
As the women on the jury sit and closely listen to CMs interview with LE how do you think they feel about his abnormal vindictiveness he displayed against Summer?
Tia
Jmo
It's pointless because his case is 'I wasn't there, it wasn't me'. So why take issue over whether bleach was used or not? I think they are missing the wood for the trees here and this might have been one big boo-boo in their zeal to prove the State wrong.I then to agree
I wonder if the murderer has not displayed his guilty knowledge in plain sight here.
He got very agitated and schooled his Attorneys on what "really happened".
But why should he be so excited over this point? I get why it may matter but why this of all things?
Is it because he knows precisely what happened and this is his chance to get one over the State?