Thanks!
Page of cheques paid to Metro before Feb 1st 2010, attempting to show that Joey always capitalized names , but Carmen didn't notice whether he did or not. I think this is going to be another drawn out testimony hampered by memory problems.
View attachment 166875
No they certainly didn't. However, it's usually the defense that will portray the victim as a bad guy, it's certain not necessary for the prosecution to do so.
Where is that from? His phone records?
Judge was questioning Smith about anonymous tips, theories, etc. and asked if he had contacted what sound like CVS to help find out the source...(probably not the right initials, hard to hear) and defense objected. CM could very well have called in bogus tips.
That’s one way to look at it. The way I see it the jury expects the defense to portray the victim as a nefarious character, so they discount the portrayal to a certain degree. However, when it’s the prosecution that’s doing so the jury has a tendency to accept it at face value.Yeah this takes the air out the balloon for the defense. Just lay it all out there in black and white. Good, bad, and ugly.
Great strategy by the state actually. I have seen other prosecutors take the wind out of the defense before in other cases.
I'm sure the defense wasn't expecting the state to steal their thunder. LOL! Oh well it happens.
So the defense wants to talk about Dave or Joey? Okay.
No doubt the defense had planned to disparage Joey in order for them to say DK had a reason to kill him.
Alrighty then that's exactly what the state will do now and in future testimony.
Imo
Yeah this takes the air out the balloon for the defense. Just lay it all out there in black and white. Good, bad, and ugly.
Great strategy by the state actually. I have seen other prosecutors take the wind out of the defense before in other cases.
I'm sure the defense wasn't expecting the state to steal their thunder. LOL! Oh well it happens.
So the defense wants to talk about Dave or Joey? Okay.
No doubt the defense had planned to disparage Joey in order for them to say DK had a reason to kill him.
Alrighty then that's exactly what the state will do now and in future testimony.
Imo
Hadn’t they just moved?
Didn't they move to Ca from Arizona? Or, did they live in the LA area prior to Fallbrook?
That’s one way to look at it. The way I see it the jury expects the defense to portray the victim as a nefarious character, so they discount the portrayal to a certain degree. However, when it’s the prosecution that’s doing so the jury has a tendency to accept it at face value.
I think they moved from San Clemente
One thing that puzzles me: JM ran his business from home in Fallbrook, right? WHY would he select San Fernando to store his business supplies at? SF is hours away from his home.
I don’t recall where they lived prior.
Mom's garage maybe?