Thank you! That's what I understood too... and it was from after they were found, but before he was arrested, right?Items were found on his phone not his computer
Thank you! That's what I understood too... and it was from after they were found, but before he was arrested, right?Items were found on his phone not his computer
Thank you! That's what I understood too... and it was from after they were found, but before he was arrested, right?
But we don't know, at this time, how long ago the photo/ss was taken. He may have had that on his phone for a few years.
Cathy Russon @cathyrusson
#McStay - Lunch recess until 1:30 PST. Before lunch Det. Dan Hanke was on the stand testifying about the Feb 8 & 9 calls made to QuickBooks, and again going over the QuickBooks account, payees on it.
1:05 PM - 14 Feb 2019
Do any of you old timers here think/remember CM was on this forum in the early days. Chasing Waterfalls? Or am I losing the plot?
Right. He may have. Or he may NOT have. I will wait. You all are free to speculate, but I'm going to wait to see it myself. What are the chances he had the same phone in 2013/14 that he had in 2010, knowing that he apparently changed companies in February 2010 as well. JMO
And I heard it as screenshot. Not picture.
While I am all for discussing theories, currently I attach no seriousness to the idea that Chase was authorised to create these cheques for the following reasons
1. The obvious prima facie conclusion is these cheques are fraudulent - that natural inference holds until disturbed
2. A course of dealing in running the custom account including deleting cheques actually cashed cannot be spoken into existence by defence counsel
3. Such course of dealing must be evidenced at trial - burden is on the defence to raise it as an issue
4. Such course of dealing cannot be evidenced by experts - it must be evidenced by those with direct knowledge e.g Testimony from CM
I feel like we are going down a rabbit hole that the defendant himself will not testify to.
I may be completely wrong but I do recall some of us commenting about a particular poster.ohhh that would be interesting! I know Mikey posted on the InSession forum when they first disappeared. And I believe a poster there was also Gina Watson (the woman that was helping Patrick). But I have never heard that Chase posted here or anywhere (other than on a DailyMail article I believe? someone had pointed it out to me when the trial first started)
Right. He may have. Or he may NOT have. I will wait. You all are free to speculate, but I'm going to wait to see it myself. What are the chances he had the same phone in 2013/14 that he had in 2010, knowing that he apparently changed companies in February 2010 as well. JMO
And I heard it as screenshot. Not picture.
Dan profited quarter of a million dollars after Joey disappearedHow? lol
I could be completely wrong, but my "women's intuition" is telling me, that CM may have been trying to put some sort of "moves" on SM and she rejected him (that could also be an explanation for him hanging around their house, constantly). His comment about her and JM "not having sex for over a year," sticks in my head. If he was bold enough to keep stealing/conning money out of the guy, what would stop him from trying to bed his wife, as well? Whenever he has spoken of her, there's so much bitterness. I think she rebuffed him and probably told JM about something untoward happening, also.
The 'screenshot' vs 'picture' confuses me. I always thought that to do a screenshot, you needed to be on a computer or a tablet.
How do you get a screenshot on your phone, except by taking a picture of it?
Sorry Mica my error I've changed it to Joey. Too much stuff rolling around in my old brain.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.