But he only has natural graying around his nape and temples. The remainder looks dyed to me, though. How does one do that in jail?
In jail, no. However, Defense Attorneys can arrange this at the court holding cells.
But he only has natural graying around his nape and temples. The remainder looks dyed to me, though. How does one do that in jail?
OT
I hope you came away as a big winner during your casino trip.
Oh my goodness! Tons of insiders and family on those boards! Turned into a soap opera. So sad for the family.It got really ugly.I was very active on the old CourtTV boards. I don't recall Chase being there, but Mikey definitely was, I believe his wife was at one time and even Gina Watson. JMO because no way to prove it now lol
Seriously? Who knew?In jail, no. However, Defense Attorneys can arrange this at the court holding cells.
Back in the day there was talk of a possible safe in the house. Never proven. Not cyber savvy. Have no clue why this is bolded. Never mind. Just figured it out.
Seriously? Who knew?
Sorry.I meant way earlier. Brain freeze.This was way later as I recall.
Part of the whole personality. Large and in charge. Much smarter than anyone else. Manipulative. MOO
I love these kinda posts in the middle of a thread LOL
It was like katy's strikethrough a few threads ago.
This was way later as I recall.
Wouldn't work for me. Deluxe nachos.Speaking from experience. Do you know how they get inmates to stand in a line-up? They offer them a candy bar and I AM NOT joking! Again, time out of their cell.
Do you know if there was any crime in the neighborhood at that time that Ms. Mitchelly might have been concerned about?
It's unfortunate that it was all lost. Mikey had posted info that is no where near the truth now ... and some of it just doesn't make any sense to me in hindsight and hearing what we are hearing, but it's all from memory, so it's 'whatever' info now LOLOh my goodness! Tons of insiders and family on those boards! Turned into a soap opera. So sad for the family.It got really ugly.
Seriously? Who knew?
Yep, and I'd like to see another case where a totally innocent man was more than willing to give up years of their freedom when they had a constitutional right to opt for a speedy trial instead?
Imo
This is a great explanation! Thanks!
Although I agree that it's absurd to "act like jurors", I don't think it's absurd to listen to the evidence and discuss that evidence, and then maybe adjust our opinions accordingly. IMO it's absurd to me that some can't or won't even acknowledge that some of the "evidence" has changed. And the actual trial evidence is getting lost in theories IMO
Wouldn't work for me. Deluxe nachos.
I think it's hard when you actually care that the right person is convicted and that there is real justice to just be entertained by all this. Real people are impacted by these cases on so many levels. Evidence, actual hard facts, are all we have to guide us. Evidence matters. I just have a hard time seeing this only as a form of entertainment.