I have problems understanding audio only. Am I missing a lot?
I have problems understanding audio only. Am I missing a lot?
Also from Court Portal....
Next hearings...
What I found most interesting in the exchange about the 4th between the 2... Mr. Merritt telling Ms. Jarvis he was home, she says she knows... it was a Thursday, you would have been at the school.... Phone rang, you saw it, obviously, I didn't, I never remembered that phone call, ever, I still don't to this day.
These are statements made when they don't think anyone is "listening"
I want to know why on Thursday she would be at the school? They still think that she saw that call come through at 8:28pm but Chase didn't answer it, he still doesn't recall it though. I do recall a week or so ago, McGee showed someone that there were 2 calls on Joey's records, but only 1 on Chases.... I wonder if they are going with 'it didn't register on Chase's'? I will have to see if I can find that later or tomorrow.
From the Court Portal...
Also from Court Portal....
Next hearings...
I think the youngest 2 were a bit older, but not sure how much older. I want to say school aged anyway.Because these are the parents of three kids...
Everyone forgets that in addition to whatever else Chase was up to, he was a parent. And from all accounts an involved parent. Juggling three kids and work and all the other stuff, it's like a three ring circus. A parent' s mind is sucked right out of them when at least two of the children are very young-and I believe that two of Chase's children were about the same age as Gianni and Joseph.
I think the youngest 2 were a bit older, but not sure how much older. I want to say school aged anyway.
Can me dense, but are you being facetious??So Chase's alibi that he gave to police is looking just swell
Because these are the parents of three kids...
Everyone forgets that in addition to whatever else Chase was up to, he was a parent. And from all accounts an involved parent. Juggling three kids and work and all the other stuff, it's like a three ring circus. A parent' s mind is sucked right out of them when at least two of the children are very young-and I believe that two of Chase's children were about the same age as Gianni and Joseph.
*snipped*
As for threatening to take kids ... that's horrible. That's why I'm not so sure the Prosecution really wants the defense to be able to play those LE interviews if there are any threats to CJ in them.
By whose account was Chase an involved parent? Besides his own account?
Really? If she is/was complicit, that's pretty much what would happen. She's not some lily white, bible toting moral bastion of angelic proportions. CJ is/was hooked up with a multiple felon. He already HAD a record. She had children with him. She more than likely benefited from some of his crimes. You can't live with a criminal and claim ignorance.
LE was giving her the "CYA" option. That was her opportunity to tell what she knew, and if it didn't fit the facts, there would be repercussions.
LE will tell you that significant others are the ones most likely to spill the beans.
#McStay - CORRECTION: Catherine Jarvis is a defense witness not prosecution. Also, judge will allow the prosecution to cross examine Jarvis about the jailhouse recording of Merritt talking to her about his whereabouts on Feb 4, 2010.