RS&BBM
Thank you for finding this article,
@rahod1. And I suspect from the veterinary text you cited, it could have been as early as 20 minutes when Oski started to show signs of heat stress (e.g. panting). So let's say it was in the 20-60 minute range. IMO that may bring us back to the idea the family did not make it far on their adventure.
And given where they were found, it could support the idea they started down the SL trail, perhaps aiming for the river for a dip as some have postulated. Even if their intent had been a roundtrip on the SL trail or a full loop, IMO they only got as far as where they were found, or perhaps a bit lower if they had turned around.
Applying this further to our data analysis so far, it could also mean it was likely
not feasible for Oski to make it to the Merced river, unless carried perhaps. And I suppose that could be a possibility. Maybe Oski did waver at about 20-60 min. into their hike. And they decided to carry Oski down to the river to cool down... cascade begins.
This is within my line of thinking. Looking at the hourly temperatures that day & assuming they hit the trail between 8-9, regardless of direction, I think Oski would be starting to overheat within a mile of their car/30 min, which would have been the time to turn back (to start getting him cooled off & likely on the way to the nearest vet).
My personal opinion is that this hike was too hot to attempt with a dog full stop, but if I entertain the idea that I lived nearby & just wanted to try out a new piece of hiking gear, I would start early & turn back to the car within a 1/2 mile (but really a 1/4 mi would be safest, especially if you got a post-0800 start). Which honestly sounds pretty reasonable when you factor in that someone is packing a small child, which is added weight & an added individual susceptible to the temperatures.
With those temperatures & that exposed terrain I would expect that Oski encountered issues within the first half of the 3-4 miles down to the water (from either direction), particularly if he was off leash for some of that & over-exerting himself at the beginning when it was slightly cooler. If he was showing signs of being overheated & they’d planned for him drinking at the river, maybe they were giving him water from their camelback, a lot of dogs know how to drink from the hose, which arguably can waste a lot of water.
I have looked at the loop from both directions. I think the way the CNN article (? The one that had the best info) is worded, makes it sound like they believe them to have made the loop as LE were following footprints that headed in the gradual decline direction & then family was found when a 2nd SAR group went down the steep switchbacks. Truthfully I am shocked that they made it to the water from either direction, given how quickly those morning temps rose, & again, the terrain. to me it means they would have to be going at a good clip without breaks to get down there before realizing it was too hot. Or were they hurrying to get down because Oski was overheating & going back up wasn’t deemed possible?
I have considered the possibility of if they could have survived this ordeal if they camped out/cooled off at the water until nightfall & then attempted the hike out, assuming they made it down there & realized the gravity of the kind of trouble they were in (I feel like they could have). & I’ve also considered the possibility of their knowledge/fear of the algae preventing their doing so, which truthfully would be a difficult decision to make if they knew of the risks.
If I were in those temperatures with an overheating dog, I think I’d take the risk & try to find a spot with some sort of good flow, without big mats & get them in to cool off… knowing it could be risking their life either way.. it’d be a terrible position to be in. But I think by the time it was 90, hiking out from down there wouldn’t be an option. If Oski got sick & passed while they were at the water would it scare them to want to hurry themselves out without taking stock of how they were feeling?
I think if they did make it down to the water there was likely a lot of fear & distress impacting their decision making.
Just looking at this from the dog’s perspective I really feel there had to be some signs that this wasn’t a good plan within the first mile, it was already getting to be too hot even if they started right at 0800 sharp in a burned mountain valley with the only reprieve from the heat a potentially algae-infested river several miles away. & any time you ever take a hike starting on a downhill, you have to know that it’s going to be an uphill on the way out & it’s not getting any cooler out.. even with no fore-planning/route-finding/weather-scoping, that fact should be glaringly obvious to even the most oblivious, which from all we can tell, this couple was not - what prevented them from cutting their losses & turning around & heading back within the first mile of their venture?
As a dog owner, avid dog hiker, & vet - that’s been the hard part of this for me to grapple with.