@Pumphouse363 I responded in blue to your post below:
Thank you for that detailed response. I’d just like to say I didn’t suggest they had been ‘placed’ on the trail. (
You’re right—I’m sorry I made that inference!) In regard to your points:
There has been no confirmation that LE has accessed their phones or computers except to say the phone found on Jon was sent to the FBI
(They’ve publicly confirmed little, we don’t know if they have accessed them or not. We know from the last LE updates that they are working on that.)
Yes they were active hikers - so some credence should be afforded their ability to determine what would be required for the hike that’s been suggested they took on Sunday.
(Yes, I agree.)
Just because Jon allegedly researched part of the HC trail does not indicate they had any intention of accessing the SL trail.
(He researched it, had previously hiked part of the trail according to his AllTrails account, were seen close to the trail that morning, and ultimately were found there. I think the intention is clear, imo.)
He also has researched and investigated the HC trail on more than one occasion on his Alltrails account. One was a year ago and one four years ago.
The trail is close to one of their properties - they own four properties in Mariposa so are familiar with the area and landscape. There has to be a motive for a murder so you can’t really determine what lengths someone will go to unless you know the reason.
(I think first you have to have proof a murder has been committed. In this case we haven’t had any indication from LE that this is the case.
I mentioned that it’s unusual for murderers to go to such great lengths to kill a family in this manner, if these were targeted murders. It would mean the killers would be proficient in hiking during very high temperatures. Why not kill them in their home?
If it’s a crime of opportunity, that makes even less sense. LE made it sound as if they were relatively undisturbed. I’d expect the dog would have died defending them, and there would be unmistakable signs of that.)
Ellen’s photo and message at 6.45 has not been printed in any media reports except that ‘some people’ have seen it. So no evidence of that.
(We’ve linked several media reports where LE has stated that Ellen sent or posted this photo at 6:45 am. This is a fact.
What is in dispute is that some of us, including me, saw the photo and caption early on but now we cannot find it. Maybe it has been removed from online articles that first posted it. But the description of what we saw is consistent with what LE and MSM stated.)
The witness sighting at 7.45 was of the vehicle heading in the direction of the trail - not actually at the trailhead.
(You’re right: witnesses saw them travelling down Hites Cove Road towards the trailhead.)
Yes you’re right in saying it is a very remote area where they were discovered. It is very challenging terrain so why would two intelligent, caring, loving parents take their daughter and beloved dog on a hike to Devil's Gulch and the Savage Lundy Trail?
(I don’t know.
An accomplished SAR tracker here has said that at times we’re all one bad decision away from ending up featured in one of these cases found in these threads.
Posters in these threads have told their own stories about heatstroke/heat exhaustion. They’re worth reading.)
It is a very distressing situation and all seems to point to a tragic miscalculation on their behalf - perhaps heat exhaustion or lightning strike or toxic algae. It’s just so difficult to comprehend why they would make those decisions.
(I can’t begin to understand how distressing it must be to suffer this loss. For that I’m very sorry.
Miscalculation is possibly a good term. I think we all have at times, I certainly have.
There are inherent risks in these types of hikes, but the challenges are part of what makes it great. I think they believed they could protect their daughter, dog and each other. Maybe it was algae or something unforeseen that led to this tragedy.)