GUILTY CA - Laci Peterson, 27, pregnant, Modesto, 24 Dec 2002 #2

  • #241
I don't know what the big deal is. I worked in the prison system and you see these types of fights daily. So why is he such a big deal! Ha!..JMO

Because he is a notorious inmate. Also, the perpetrator could be looking for 15 minutes of fame and attention from other inmates.
 
  • #242
Lots of notorious Inmates. You can bet that prison didn't release that information. If there is a serious enough incident then prisons have a PIO (Public Information Officer),that came from another Inmate telling a friend or family member about the incident. Probably to make a quick buck. Prisons are pretty tight lipped about what goes on inside those fences. From experience. But also JMO.
 
  • #243
Lots of notorious Inmates. You can bet that prison didn't release that information. If there is a serious enough incident then prisons have a PIO (Public Information Officer),that came from another Inmate telling a friend or family member about the incident. Probably to make a quick buck. Prisons are pretty tight lipped about what goes on inside those fences. From experience. But also JMO.

Prisons are bastions of gossip and visitors hear much of it. Visitors give interviews, Josh Duggar in prison is an example.

2 Cents
 
  • #244
  • #245
  • #246
  • #247
  • #248
  • #249
  • #250
Just watching Banfield for a few minutes--- sounds like she is
All in on believing the findings of the innocence project---
Her guest was Mark Geragos at which point I changed
The channel
 
  • #251
  • #252
  • #253
SP and LVD twining. JMO
 
  • #254
  • #255
Sure they do. Yawn.
oh, you know, it was them burglars across the street--------they done killed Laci and framed poor ol' Scott for the crime!!!! Sure thing!
 
  • #256
oh, you know, it was them burglars across the street--------they done killed Laci and framed poor ol' Scott for the crime!!!! Sure thing!
I am sure they also threatened him and made him die his hair and try to run. Those dang burglars are so conniving!
 
  • #257
“I know the Innocence Project down in L.A. They go through a very rigorous process of vetting the cases that they’re going to take and in this situation, I would imagine they spent months if not years taking a look at the Peterson case,” legal expert Michael Cardoza says in a video interview as part of In Touch Investigates, a new series covering true crime cases. “The fact that they have decided to take this case isn’t going to mean much to the Appellate Courts. I mean it happens, not a lot, but enough times.”

“The public might think ‘oh if they took it, maybe there’s something there.’ Well, there might be something there, but it doesn’t mean that the Appellate Court will give any weight at all that the L.A. Innocence Project took this case,” he explains
 
  • #258
MURDER HAS TWO FACES season 1? Pretty interesting watch.
First episode talks about LP case and a similar case like hers. I found it interesting. JMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: byo
  • #259
@Smelly Squirrel - I have your name as my "go to" person on this case - here are the case #s that I have. Anything moving on his appeal? Last I have was in July of 2024. TIA! :)

San Mateo County Case #SC055500A / Stanislaus County Case #1056770 / Appeal #S132449/Habeas Corpus #S230782
 
  • #260
@Smelly Squirrel - I have your name as my "go to" person on this case - here are the case #s that I have. Anything moving on his appeal? Last I have was in July of 2024. TIA! :)

San Mateo County Case #SC055500A / Stanislaus County Case #1056770 / Appeal #S132449/Habeas Corpus #S230782

😂 Niner, you have more than I do. I did some searching right now. I don't see the case #S230782. Which court is that? I did find his latest filings are at California 1st Appellate District as case number A167615. Search here:


Shows several filings since that 4/21 filing.

04/21/2025Application filed to:Application for Permission to File Brief in Excess of 25,500 Words (in amended petition; to court for permission to file amended petition)
05/01/2025Motion filed.Respondent's Motion to Summarily Deny Claims 2 through 19 of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
05/07/2025Opposition filed.Petitioner's Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Summarily Deny Claims 2 through 19 in Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus & Declaration of Counsel
(no bookmarks; filed with permission)
05/07/2025To court.Respondent's Motion to Summarily Deny Claims 2 through 19 of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
05/07/2025Reply filed to:Reply to Petitioner's Opposition to Motion to Summarily Deny Claims 2 through 19 of the Amended Habeas Petition (filed w/permission)
05/08/2025Opposition filed.Petitioner's Opposition to Respondent's Motion to Summarily Deny Claims 2 through 19 in Petitioner's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus & Declaration of Counsel
(with bookmarks)

The "scheduled actions" tab shows:

Reply filed to:(due 60 days after appointment of counsel - see 7/28/2023 order)***No further extensions of time will be granted***
Petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed.Amended (NFE - see 4/4/2025 order)due 04/18/2025
Note:05/22/2025action on Application for Permission to File Brief in Excess of 25, 500 Words (in amended petition; to court for permission to file amended petition)?
Note:05/22/2025action on Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Amend & Supplement Claims Filed in Pro Se Petition?
Something is due; see note.05/22/2025action on opposed Respondent's Motion to Summarily Deny Claims 2 through 19 of the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof?

The only document I have found available is SP's 129-page declaration filed with the 4/21 filing.


That was from this story.

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
49
Guests online
2,167
Total visitors
2,216

Forum statistics

Threads
633,146
Messages
18,636,361
Members
243,411
Latest member
Unreliable Man
Back
Top