This is a really bizarre case. Not just in general but here on WS. I've got a few things to say, things I'd like feedback and opinion on but I'm not sure it's allowed.
GENERAL QUESTION HERE:
What do we do in cases where MSN is clearly implying certain scenarios (msm articles would normally be fair game for discussion) but those scenarios involve both family-which are considered victims and/or minors-which are off the table for discussion. Should we only use quoted LE statements from articles or press releases?
Hope that didn't come off as snarky! I'm genuinely curious