CA CA - Linda Sohus, 28, San Marino, 8 February 1985

[mysteriew]

Knoxx, did you ask a question also? Tallsteve asked quite a few. Good work, mysteriew!

LOL, I asked quite a few more questions than what he posted. They were talking about the attorney and his statement that it wasn't illegal for him to use alias's as long as there wasn't any fraud involved. I asked if since his marriage to Sandra was not under his real name, wouldn't that invalidate the marriage- since there was no marriage, then there was no need for a divorce, and would the divorce settlement that he recieved be considered fraud? I asked if they knew how he was supporting himself between when he worked in the late '80's and when he married Boss. I asked if they were making any progress finding out where he was and what he was doing in the missing time blocks. These questions didn't get responses. If anyone sees the answers to these in the media anywhere please let me know.

 

[Knoxx]

To his neighbours in Connecticut, Clark Rockefeller was a seemingly respectable retired physicist, a scion of the American oil dynasty, who boasted that he had once hosted Britney Spears to dinner. :woohoo:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4517990.ece

 

[capoly]

To his neighbours in Connecticut, Clark Rockefeller was a seemingly respectable retired physicist, a scion of the American oil dynasty, who boasted that he had once hosted Britney Spears to dinner. :woohoo:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4517990.ece

LOL to above and Yikes to below-


On Wall Street, the almost identical-looking Christopher Crowe said that he was the head of the Battenberg-Crowe-von-Wettin Family Foundation but used a social security number of a notorious serial killer called “The Son of Sam”.

 

[martin walkerdine]

capoly can i see proof of that please about son of sam

 

[mollymalone]

LOL, I asked quite a few more questions than what he posted. They were talking about the attorney and his statement that it wasn't illegal for him to use alias's as long as there wasn't any fraud involved. I asked if since his marriage to Sandra was not under his real name, wouldn't that invalidate the marriage- since there was no marriage, then there was no need for a divorce, and would the divorce settlement that he recieved be considered fraud? I asked if they knew how he was supporting himself between when he worked in the late '80's and when he married Boss. I asked if they were making any progress finding out where he was and what he was doing in the missing time blocks. These questions didn't get responses. If anyone sees the answers to these in the media anywhere please let me know.

Those are really good questions. He entered a marriage under a false name and that falls under fraud doesn't it?

 

[mollymalone]

capoly can i see proof of that please about son of sam

It's at the link in capoly's post.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article4517990.ece
He was fired when it emerged that he had tried to use a social security number of the “Son of Sam” serial killer, David Berkowitz, to get his Wall Street broker’s licence. His next job at Nikko Securities came to an abrupt end in 1988 when the firm was reportedly notified of his false social security number. He then managed to get hired by Kidder Peabody.

 

[mollymalone]

At that same link: Mr Gerhartsreiter married Ms Boss at a Quaker ceremony on Nantucket in 1995, the island off Massachusetts, where no marriage licence was required. The couple reportedly never received a marriage certificate.

 

[Knoxx]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaker_wedding

 

[Knoxx]

http://www.highbeam.com/search.aspx...LL&docclass=ALL&relatedid=&bid=&embargo=False

 

[mysteriew]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaker_wedding

So under Quaker rules, they didn't have to file a marriage license? I wonder what the state rules are on that? Do they have common law marriages? If they do (and they probably do if there are enough Friends in the area.) You know I have lived all my life in the US and I didn't know that.

Irregardless, I am wondering about the validity of any type of marriage since it was all done under a false name. Now this puts the divorce into question a second time, as even the ceremony is questionable whether it would be valid in another state. Most states recognize marriages from another state as long as they were legal in that state. But since it was never registered and recognized, dang this marriage has a whole log against it being valid.

 

[Knoxx]

How to apply for and obtain a Massachusetts Marriage License ...

http://www.sudburyjp.com/License.htm

 

[Knoxx]

Blood tests are not required, but you will need to bring identification and a valid proof of age. A driver’s license or a birth certificate will do the job. If you are a widow or widower you do not have to bring a death certificate. Persons who are divorced do not have to bring a divorce decree, but should be certain that their divorce is absolute.

You will not automatically receive an official copy of your Certificate of Marriage. You must apply for this with the Town Clerk or City Clerk where you applied for your license. There is usually a nominal charge (about $10 to $15, varying by town) for each copy.

Officiants are not permitted to give you a copy. Instead, we are required (by law) to complete the Certificate of Marriage and mail it back to the Town Clerk or City Clerk from whom you obtained your license. Since I use Certified Mail for this purpose, I will set up the USPS website to send you a notification when your Certificate is delivered (if I have an e-mail address for you.)

I advise you to obtain a copy of your Certificate of Marriage shortly after the wedding and file it away with your other important documents (such as your Birth Certificates). You may not need it for many years, but it will be good to know that you always have a ready copy, rather than trying to retrieve it from the Commonwealth at some date in the future.

 

[mysteriew]

Where was the divorce granted?

 

[Knoxx]

Where was the divorce granted?

Divorce!!

 

[Knoxx]

86 comments......Interesting!

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/general/view.bg?articleid=1112478

 

[Knoxx]

http://www.nypost.com/seven/0802200...ives_odd_bond_with_teen_schoolgirl_122644.htm

http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/los_angeles&id=6311628

got this from one of the 86 comments

 

[mysteriew]

Divorce!!

Yeah, they got divorced. The money he got was part of the divorce settlement as a result of negotiation for dropping his bid for custody.

To get the divorce considered invalid and fraudulent I am afraid will depend on the laws in two or more states. Meaning tough to prosecute (if it is determined to be legally fraudulent of course.) And I wonder if he was aware of that when he arranged the marriage?

 

[Knoxx]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...rockefeller-are-they-the-same-man-892870.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Chichester-Clark,_Baron_Moyola

 

[mysteriew]

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...rockefeller-are-they-the-same-man-892870.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Chichester-Clark,_Baron_Moyola

Knox, you amaze me. You have the patience to run down and research the most minute details, things I don't have the patience for. Yet when you do it I always find something facinating.

So maybe Chichester nor Clark may not have been associated with the US, but instead with Ireland.

 

[Knoxx]

We already know this..A day late and a dollar short..

mysteriew Question Most of the media is saying that Rockefeller came here as an exchange student
Michael_Levenson right. the term "exchange student" is not really apt, however, because he was not part of any formal exchange program. By his family's account and the accounts of the families who hosted him in Berlin, Conn. in the late 1970s, he had come to the US on his own, seeking fame and fortune.

The Clark Rockefeller case
http://boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2008/08/12/the_clark_rockefeller_case/