PickieChickie--Many adoptive families would find your statements to be very hurtful and I'm fairly sure you don't mean them to be. The Child Welfare Act of 1980 set aside entitlement funds for the adoption assistance of all children placed domestically (not foreign children) who were deemed to have special needs or difficult to place due to age, sibling status, or adverse parental background.
This program is funded by a combination of state and federal dollars (at a ratio equal to the Medicaid Program as outlined in each State Plan). Any person who successfully completes a homestudy and has a special needs child placed with them has a right and a responsibility to advocate for that child's entitlement funds. They are IV-E funds and are not linked to SSI. That program is completely separate and is a means based program based upon a parent's (birth or adoptive) income. Adoption assistance payments are intended to offset any negative impact occurring with the placement of a special needs child within an adoptive family. A family, including other children in the family, are not to be financially impacted by the adopted child. The funds are to be used in any way the parent deems appropriate ie. specialized respite, property repair and replacement, therapy, special services, special dietary needs, etc. There is no accounting of the family expenditures after the initial negotiation has taken place as per federal law.
I have worked for the last 20 years in the area of adoption subsidies and I take issue with the fact that parents "adopt for the money". We are not discussing healthy well children here but children who are able to be maintained in family homes strictly due to appropriate adoption assistance rates (up to but never more than the appropriate foster care rate). Congress determined in 1980 that this program would save taxpayers up to seven times the cost of foster care even if the payments were equal, due to the fact that the agency ceased oversight of the child and that it was likely that the adoptive family would remain a resource for the child long after majority.
The program has been resoundingly successful and serves as an incentive to placement and a facilitator of success. There are currently almost 400,000 children waiting for adoption in the US and those children all qualify and are categorically entitled to a monthly adoption assistance payment through the age of 18 or 21, depending on the state. There must be no means test applied.
Lydia's family adopted her through a private agency which placed children from Africa. These adoptions cost anywhere from $12,000-25,000 each, not including travel. Children adopted internationally (except in extremely rare circumstances) do not qualify for adoption assistance. One interesting fact is that Lydia's sister, Zariah, will now qualify for AAP as she has come under the jurisdiction of the state.
For further information, I highly suggest you peruse the fact sheets on subsidies on the website of the North American Council for Adoptable Children:
www.nacac.org
We have thousands of children awaiting homes and there are state and federal funds to create an incentive to place those children. Every child deserves a forever family.