Nope. And seems we've disagreed before on the definition of "weak evidence" -- all being in cases of no corpse that won convictions at trial. MOOHas anyone ever seen a case with such weak evidence for a murder case? The defense is going to have fun with this one, I feel ol' Larry has plenty of money to fight this case and win.
The cross seems to go on and on…![]()
Preliminary hearing for Larry Millete enters day 6 in San Diego court
The preliminary hearing for Larry Millete, Chula Vista husband accused of murdering his wife Maya, entered its sixth day of testimony.www.cbs8.com
From the video link above, the prosecutor hopes to call the last witness on Friday but based on the defense cross, the redirect by the prosecution may not be completed until Monday.
An 8-day PRELIM is unusual -- not too many trials exceed 8 days of testimony!
Just Donthe Lucas case, you make is sound like there were numerous of them. still think that case was weak, if he kept his mouth shut in prison i dont think we would have been convicted, if he had money like Barry Morphew or Larry Millette instead of a public defender zi think he wouod have gotten off anyway.Nope. And seems we've disagreed before on the definition of "weak evidence" -- all being in cases of no corpse that won convictions at trial. MOO
4:30 p.m.: Court concludes for the day. Kristeen Timmers, Maya's co-worker and good friend of 10 years, was dismissed from the witness stand. The judge started going over how proceedings will go on Friday, since the defense has some scheduling conflicts.LIVE BLOG: Thursday, Jan 19 (Day 6)--PM continued.
^^ Appending to post to add late blog entries after the video of the hearing ended. (Thank you, @Niner).4:15 p.m.: The defense asks Timmers if there was any time during Dec. 2020 or Jan. 2021 that Maya said she just wanted to run away.
"No, I don't remember," she replied.
Martinez then asked if it was true in Dec. 2020 that Maya was not having a good relationship with her in laws.
"I don't know," Timmers said on the stand.
4:11 p.m.: Timmers testified that Maya told her she needed to get through the weekend of Jan. 8 through Jan. 10, 2021. She said Maya wanted a happy birthday weekend for her children during the Big Bear trip, and Maya's divorce appointment was scheduled for the Tuesday after the trip.
When Martinez asked Timmers if she knew why Maya was angry at Larry on May 7, 2020, the judge again reminded the defense to stay on relevant topics.
"Every little thing that occurred in March and May is not relevant to these proceedings," the judge said.
4:03 p.m.: Timmers testified that earlier in the marriage, Larry was a typical husband who had a sense of humor. When asked, she confirmed that Larry made jokes about how Maya was his "sugar mama."
The defense asked Timmers about the statements she made to police on Jan. 19, 2021. Timmers confirmed she didn't notice any major negative interactions between Larry and Maya.
Timmers went on to say that Maya told her that the subliminal messages Larry sent her angered Maya, but she believed they did not damage Maya emotionally or psychologically.
"No, she was just angry about it," Timmers testified.
The defense asked if Maya was scared of Larry.
"She was just scared of him hurting the children... That was toward the end of the year," Timmers testified.
"Did she explain what she meant by that?" defense attorney Bonita Martinez asked.
"No, she stated it simply," Timmers replied.
3:55 p.m.: Throughout the beginning of cross examination, the judge interrupted the defense attorney several times, saying the line of questioning was not relevant or that the witness had already gone over the details at length during direct examination.
3:46 p.m.: The defense begins its cross examination of Kristeen Timmers, Maya's co-worker and good friend of 10 years.
Defense attorney Bonita Martinez asked Timmers about when she first noticed problems with Maya and Larry's marriage. She said early 2020, but when Martinez asked about Larry's overbearing behavior, she testified that he'd always been like that.
Martinez asked if Maya and the group of friends would go to brunch and drink regularly. Timmers said they would do it occasionally, but when Martinez asked more questions about alcohol, she said Maya was not much of a drinker.
3:32 p.m.: Timmers testified that Maya talked about future plans in 2021, including plans to coordinate events for all of their boys' birthdays. Maya also spoke about a Hawaii trip, and Timmers testified she and the other girls made a side text chain to discuss that potential trip.
They discussed it, saying they would go to Hawaii if it were a girls' trip, but if it were a family trip, they wouldn't go. Their reasoning was that Maya would be miserable if Larry was there too.
"If Larry came along and it was a family trip, we just didn't want to be part of that," Timmers testified.
Timmers said she communicated with Maya everyday before Jan. 7, 2021. She also said she has not seen or heard from Maya since Jan. 7, 2021.
The prosecution finished asking this witness questions.
3:27 p.m.: The prosecution asked Timmers about another text thread, this time from Jan. 8, 2021. Timmers sent a message to Maya, saying she needs to check her door for packages since she sent a gift to her home via Amazon.
Maya did not respond to the text about the packages.
The prosecution also asked about a Facebook group chat, in which Maya sent messages to the group on Jan. 7, 2021. The group chat was comprised of Maya's work friends.
In that group chat, Maya shared that Larry wanted 100% custody of the kids. Timmers testified that Maya would never agree to that. Maya also texted about the division of assets.
Timmers testified that she told Maya to give him whatever he wants, expect for the kids and family. She explained that she told Maya that because that was important to her.
3:15 p.m.: Timmers testified that the brunch on Dec. 27, 2020, was the last time she saw Maya. During that brunch, Maya told them about the upcoming Glamis trip. Timmers said she and Maya were still communicating daily, mostly through a Messenger group.
Timmers testified she remembered messaging Maya on Jan. 6, 2021. Timmers sifted through a binder containing lengthy text messages between her and Maya from that day before the prosecution asked her more questions.
Timmers said Maya was telling her that Larry was threatening to open an investigation that was previously unfounded. Maya also sent a text saying she was no longer interested in trying to make it work.
Maya said the couple was in a dark place, and she sent screenshots of text conversations between her and Larry to Timmers, Timmers said on the stand.
The text messages also showed that Maya said she still couldn't get the safe open, and she shared more worries about her finances.
"You'll see the light soon enough, the decision to divorce is the hardest part," Timmers' text to Maya said.
"I really hope so," Maya replied in the thread.
"Yes, there will be better days ahead," Timmers replied.
Timmers said that was the last iMessage she sent Maya that day.
3:06 p.m.: Timmers testifies that she and Maya went to brunch with another friend, Ally, on Dec. 27, 2020. She said they talked about the status of Maya's relationship with Larry, and Maya told them she was moving more and more towards divorce.
Maya said she needed to find money, since Larry was controlling the finances. Timmers testified that Maya's salary was over six figures, and Maya had always made more money than Larry since she had known the couple.
Timmers testified that she and Ally told Maya not to worry about money, and that they would have her back. Maya had also mentioned to them her sisters were starting to financially support her. At this point, Maya said she was starting to put cash away whenever she could.
![]()
LIVE BLOG: Google searches 'significant' in Millete investigation, CVPD detective says
Following the preliminary hearing, the judge in the case of missing Chula Vista mom Maya Millete will determine if her husband Larry Millete will stand trial.www.10news.com
Timmers said she communicated with Maya everyday before Jan. 7, 2021. She also said she has not seen or heard from Maya since Jan. 7, 2021.
The prosecution finished asking this witness questions.
3:27 p.m.: The prosecution asked Timmers about another text thread, this time from Jan. 8, 2021. Timmers sent a message to Maya, saying she needs to check her door for packages since she sent a gift to her home via Amazon.
Maya did not respond to the text about the packages.
The prosecution also asked about a Facebook group chat, in which Maya sent messages to the group on Jan. 7, 2021. The group chat was comprised of Maya's work friends.
In that group chat, Maya shared that Larry wanted 100% custody of the kids. Timmers testified that Maya would never agree to that. Maya also texted about the division of assets.
Timmers testified that she told Maya to give him whatever he wants, expect for the kids and family. She explained that she told Maya that because that was important to her.
3:15 p.m.: Timmers testified that the brunch on Dec. 27, 2020, was the last time she saw Maya. During that brunch, Maya told them about the upcoming Glamis trip. Timmers said she and Maya were still communicating daily, mostly through a Messenger group.
Timmers said she communicated with Maya everyday before Jan. 7, 2021. She also said she has not seen or heard from Maya since Jan. 7, 2021.
The prosecution finished asking this witness questions.
3:27 p.m.: The prosecution asked Timmers about another text thread, this time from Jan. 8, 2021. Timmers sent a message to Maya, saying she needs to check her door for packages since she sent a gift to her home via Amazon.
Maya did not respond to the text about the packages.
The prosecution also asked about a Facebook group chat, in which Maya sent messages to the group on Jan. 7, 2021. The group chat was comprised of Maya's work friends.
In that group chat, Maya shared that Larry wanted 100% custody of the kids. Timmers testified that Maya would never agree to that. Maya also texted about the division of assets.
Timmers testified that she told Maya to give him whatever he wants, expect for the kids and family. She explained that she told Maya that because that was important to her.
3:15 p.m.: Timmers testified that the brunch on Dec. 27, 2020, was the last time she saw Maya. During that brunch, Maya told them about the upcoming Glamis trip. Timmers said she and Maya were still communicating daily, mostly through a Messenger group.
"He said, 'If anyone would take $20,000 and then I'll give you $4000 for all your troubles' that's what he was telling me. I told him 'I don't want to get involved,"" said Jaypie Tabalanza.
"Timmers testified that in August 2020, May told her she had found a cellphone hidden in her car, which she said had been planted there by her husband."
In the final month before her disappearance, May also told Timmers that she found a cellphone beneath her bed that was "playing subliminal messages."
LM honestly thinks his defense is helping him? Maybe his ego is so inflated he cannot admit he picked a moldy melon. She’s so out of her league, it’s pathetic.
Prosecutors have uncovered a ton of evidence to support LM’s M.O. TBH, the financial aspect had me surprised. Maya seems like such a strong woman, but he controlled finances? LM changed the codes to the safe? That’s premeditated action for some sort of crime if you ask me IMO
Why didn't Larry do it, then? Is he only the father when he wants to use the children to hurt May and her family? They are digusting and pathetic, all of them. Those poor kids.The defense asking witness Ms. Timmers if she was aware that Maya didn't drive her own children to school daily and the paternal grandparents had to do this was halted by the Judge!
Unbelievable!
How many parents start work at hours preventing them to deliver their children to school unless they intend to leave them at the school door in the dark?
Have you even been watching? The defense is not having fun, and this is definitely going to trial.Has anyone ever seen a case with such weak evidence for a murder case? The defense is going to have fun with this one, I feel ol' Larry has plenty of money to fight this case and win.
I find the defense’s approach both annoying and despicable. As the sister-in-law stated on the stand, she felt she was being tormented by the defense. More like terrorized in my opinion…Have you even been watching? The defense is not having fun, and this is definitely going to trial.
Moo
I've been watching the hearing and am shocked at the performance of LM's defense attorney. How is this attorney allowed to practice in a court of law? Most of her questions have been disqualified by objections. The judge repeatedly has to explain court procedure and court law to her.I find the defense’s approach both annoying and despicable. As the sister-in-law stated on the stand, she felt she was being tormented by the defense. More like terrorized in my opinion…
Ugh you’re right, and I feel a judge might agree.I've been watching the hearing and am shocked at the performance of LM's defense attorney. How is this attorney allowed to practice in a court of law? Most of her questions have been disqualified by objections. The judge repeatedly has to explain court procedure and court law to her.
When LM looses at trial, he can blame it on incompetent defense.
my opinion.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.