CA - Pacific Palisades - 30,000 People Ordered to Evacuate From L.A. Wildfires #2

  • #521
How would you know?



Well, I don't know if for a fact. But the fact that he called 911, and the fire department left the scene after determining the fire was out, even though it was not, is likely to make getting a conviction on manslaughter charges difficult.
 
  • #522
I don't see why. If he were driving recklessly and caused a crash and then called 911, it shouldn't make a difference imo.
 
  • #523
Should get manslaughter charges. moo

I wish we could add "Animal Cruelty" charges. More than property crime. Arson. Prison isn't a nice place for animal abusers. They rate even lower than child killers.
 
  • #524
I don't see why. If he were driving recklessly and caused a crash and then called 911, it shouldn't make a difference imo.
I started to answer this one way, but then deleted it. Lets just say, in my opinion, a prosecutor will have real concerns about being able to secure a conviction on this case.
 
  • #525
I started to answer this one way, but then deleted it. Lets just say, in my opinion, a prosecutor will have real concerns about being able to secure a conviction on this case.

Probably.
 
  • #526
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Pic was on his computer from ChatGTP downloaded prior to the fire.
Was just coming to post this.
 
  • #527
Well, I don't know if for a fact. But the fact that he called 911, and the fire department left the scene after determining the fire was out, even though it was not, is likely to make getting a conviction on manslaughter charges difficult.
Yet the ATF agent in the article I read, said that he did that as kinda an alibi type thing. To make it look like he couldn't possibly have started it because he was cooperative.
 
  • #528
Yet the ATF agent in the article I read, said that he did that as kinda an alibi type thing. To make it look like he couldn't possibly have started it because he was cooperative.
Did this man start this fire that led to all this horror? Yes, clearly. I am just saying there may be good reasons why we don't see prosecutors bring those manslaughter charges so many want. Maybe I am totally wrong.
 
  • #529
Yet the ATF agent in the article I read, said that he did that as kinda an alibi type thing. To make it look like he couldn't possibly have started it because he was cooperative.
What's his defense gonna do- blame the fire department? They said that he intentionally started the original fire. He was angry and agitated on his Uber drives right beforehand and had been watching/listening to arson images/music immediately beforehand. The Palisades fire was one of those rebound-type fires (can't recall the exact terminology) where the hot spots aren't completely extinguished and it starts back up again. The bottom line is that he chose to start a fire at the time of year when it was extreme fire danger and extremely dry, windy conditions. He knew what would happen and tried to blame it on cigarettes, which I read that they can prove wasn't the case. I'm extremely angry at this guy because several of my relatives homes were threatened, including my grandparents home.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
2,467
Total visitors
2,571

Forum statistics

Threads
632,932
Messages
18,633,816
Members
243,349
Latest member
Mandarina_kat
Back
Top