Hello
@bbbd4u 
, would you mind telling us your opinion about Paul 's disappearance? I think everyone here would appreciate it very much!
You girls and guys who deal with SAR have my deepest respect.
I can give my opinion but there are a couple of variables that have not been made public that would change my opinion. First I have to say I my certifications are done through NASAR 'National Association for Search and Rescue.' I am not a dog handler but I am very well expierence with being a flanker for a dog handler. I also have a lot of expierence with being in Incident Command and overseeing operations and planning in regards to running a search operation. I am not an expert but I do consider myself well seasoned. One thing I have learned over the years is each search is unique in itself and there is always something to learn and improve on in each mission.
This is my opinion an mine alone. I am one to follow the facts I know the mind can wander and sometimes the wandering but strictly speaking on SAR operations you have to go where the facts lead.
The response time was phenomenal! It is not very often that there is such a tight timeline and that timeline helps greatly! He was not long overdue when reported missing! A search was activated within a short period of time after being reported missing. Which I take that as there is less chance for cross contamination in the area I would call his LKP- 'Last Known Point.' I completely understand that as I currently know there has been no one who has "seen" him in this area. It's considered his LKP because he had "told" his wife that is where he was going and that is where his car was found so that area must be cleared.
I would love to know if they deployed trailing dogs immediately upon arrival. If I were leading the search I would put one dog, their handler and a flanker at the LKP and assign them to search 1/2 mile of the trail. I would then assign a 2nd dog to that same assignment because animals are like humans they are not perfect and things can get missed.
From what I had read no dogs made a 'hit' on anything in that area. I would have applied more resources such as they did. In SAR people are trained to look for clues, also known as sign cutting. With nothing being reported as having any sign or trace of him in that area I would report back to LE and I would tell them I am 90% confident that the missing subject is not in that area. It would be at 95% if there were drone footage available to clear areas boots on the ground could not search.
I would then hope LE would further look into the details of the missing subjects personal life. Who was the last person to actually see the person alive and where did they last see him? Has his cell phone location been pinged? If it pinged to another area in my opinion that area and a 1.5 mile radius around his last cell phone ping should be cleared.
I would not stick resources back into the National Park area LKP unless there was a change in the weather. When the weather cools some it would then be worth an additional search of sending cadaver dogs in.
Nothing about this search based on public knowledge (I know what you know) tells me he was ever at this location!