CA CA - Phuong Le, 24, Fairfield, 25 April 2010 - #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #501
I agree with you clucian. Clothing will not disintegrate in two weeks and having searched for unidentifieds, clothing can last for many years.
 
  • #502
Bless Phoung and her family...this loss of life is especially sad to me...
 
  • #503
Why did media contact the family and take them there?
That seems cruel to me.
LE should of notified the family.
Family should never have to see the bad stuff.
That will remain in their minds forever.
I feel so bad for the family and what they have to go through.
 
  • #504
Right and to get to Napa, the driver would have to cross the bridge to Vallejo. Seems the 🤬🤬🤬 wanted to make it look random. But I don't buy it either. "Random killers don't go to the effort of hiding bodies"...as far as clothed, I bet she was. IMO
I don't agree that random killers don't hide bodies. We've seen it too often. Just recently John Gardner hid the bodies of Chelsea King and Amber Dubois, who he abducted and murdered. TN is obviously a likely perp but I wouldn't be shocked if it were a stranger.
 
  • #505
I can't imagine her clothes becoming unrecognizable (excuse spelling) in this amount of time. There have been cases when years had passed and LE could still see the print on a blouse, for example, and the weather, while not ideal, was not horrible either. (I hope she had her clothes on...we don't know that for sure, do we?)

Somehow I am still on the side of this not being TN...I think if he seems to be coming across badly, it could be a nationality thing, to some extent, or simply that he is not an outspoken man. Not wanting to talk to media is intelligent...as long as he is talking to LE whenever they want to and so far, this seems to be the case. I just hate to think anyone Phoung loved/liked and trusted would do this to her...although of course, statistics tell us exactly this.
My whole point about the clothes is we don't know one way or another! I just find it odd that nothing's been mentioned, unless of course, LE wants to withhold that information for some reason.

I'm not convinced TN has any involvement until I see more pointing in his direction. It's still possible, imo, that someone she knew could've been watching her at the bookstore. Also, I don't remember it being mentioned what type of vehicle TN owns or would've had access to that night, and now that we know it would've required one to dispose of her body, I'd think LE would've gotten a s/w for it if he were a POI. MOO
 
  • #506
NG: Sheeba (caller) wants to know how long PL has known TN and could he have molested her. RH is bringing up that TN has denied ever being a "boyfriend". Pam H wants to know more about why PL was upset and had to leave the house to cool off. SM believes she was killed by someone she knew. NG stressing random killers don't go to the effort of hiding the body so she agrees.

Did NG talk about a possible sexual assault?

She was identified by jewelry, dental records, and finger printing - not by any clothes she had on. Maybe her body was naked?

I agree she was killed by someone she knew - someone who wanted to distance her from himself. However, if she was strangled (asphyxiated), that is close up and personal. moo

The boyfriend quickly said he would have been caught on property video as his alibi - does that mean his wife wasn't home? moo
 
  • #507
poor Phuong! What a horrible ending to this! Our profession has truly lost a blossoming flower and her family a star in their universe.

It sounds like LE is on leads that they consider very viable. I hope they can throw it where it sticks and bring the person down who did this.

((aside, I am in the midst of an army move so am not able to check in often.. thanks to all for all the updates))
 
  • #508
I don't agree that random killers don't hide bodies. We've seen it too often. Just recently John Gardner hid the bodies of Chelsea King and Amber Dubois, who he abducted and murdered. TN is obviously a likely perp but I wouldn't be shocked if it were a stranger.
I'm not seeing that Phuong's body was "hidden" either. Yes, it was 40-50 yds. (according to most reports) off the side of a road, but I haven't heard anything about her being buried or covered in any manner. I still think it's possible the perp chose this location because it was within his comfort zone, maybe thinking she wouldn't be found for some time. MOO
 
  • #509
Why did media contact the family and take them there?
That seems cruel to me.
LE should of notified the family.
Family should never have to see the bad stuff.
That will remain in their minds forever.
I feel so bad for the family and what they have to go through.
I think perhaps the media knows how LE can keep family in the dark and let them in on tip they had received.

Just me thinking here (and my opinion) but if that were my son missing and media were the only one giving me information I would be very glad for it... again respectfully jmhoo.
 
  • #510
Did NG talk about a possible sexual assault?

She was identified by jewelry, dental records, and finger printing - not by any clothes she had on. Maybe her body was naked?

I agree she was killed by someone she knew - someone who wanted to distance her from himself. However, if she was strangled (asphyxiated), that is close up and personal. moo

The boyfriend quickly said he would have been caught on property video as his alibi - does that mean his wife wasn't home? moo
As far as I recall, sexual assault wasn't really brought up. They were mainly talking about possible COD, such as gunshot, stabbing, strangulation and the like.

Now as for TN's wife, nothing has been said about her either. And honestly, back when he first mentioned this neighborhood surveillance video proving he hadn't left home, I wondered why he never said what is most commonly said, such as "I was home with my wife and kids". Instead his alibi is the video, so I agree, where was she? MOO
 
  • #511
That is a very good point about TN's vehicles...have we heard of any search warrants for them? If not, I would think that they will be coming soon, or that they are not considering him a POI. Of course the perp had to have a vehicle, IMO.

Also and I will be careful not to get in trouble here, but NG said a few things tonight that she acted as though they were facts...we do not know cause of death, she suggested strangulation and her panel jumped on it. And she said that random killers don't hide bodies, which we know is not true (whether or not Phoung was considered hidden is up for debate) and her panel agreed. So right there they have indicated two things that have no basis in fact at this time...only saying this so that anyone who did not see her show knows that these things were discussed, not proven.
 
  • #512
I agree. I hope they find the POI though, a random suspect seems clearly brazen being that one witness mentioned the evening at the mall that night was especially warm and verified that many people were milling about.
 
  • #513
Nancy did not state any of that stuff as fact.
 
  • #514
Nancy did not state any of that stuff as fact.

No, I know she didn't...but if you just came in on the show and heard parts of it, it seemed as though they had agreed she was strangled and that it must be someone she knows...so I was just saying that those things have not been released...just discussed as possibilities...no more reason to think that was cause of death than any other, in my opinion...
 
  • #515
This is a local case for me, and maybe these things have been posted already. Nancy Grace just gave me the last straw. In her broadcast tonight she repeatedly called Fairfield "Fairfax" She also referred to Phuong's watch as a necklace. The worst part was saying "Fairfax" is an upscale part of the Napa Valley. None of this is accurate and I am angered with her sensationalism. I appreciate that she gets the word out there, but today has really been unbelievable.
 
  • #516
Would her clothes have been intact and recognizable though, considering the effects of bio decomp? Jewelry -- I would think -- wouldn't have been all that affected by bio decomp over a period of two weeks, so jewelry would've been much more identifiable, you think? Perhaps her clothes might not have been in any kind of shape to recognize? (I honestly wouldn't know...just throwing out these questions.)

http://www.anthro4n6.net/forensics/

Items with her body would still be in pretty good condition:

Material--Length of Time in Good Condition (in months):


Rayon: 1-2 if buried / 5 on surface

Paper: 1 in alk or fresh water / 5 on surface/in acid*

Cotton/Wool: 6 in alk or fresh water / 10 to 15 on surface/in acid

Human Hair: 10 to 15 if buried / wind blows it away on surface

Cotton/Poly: 15 on surface / 25 to 35 if buried

Other Plastics/Leather: 15 to 35 on surface / >48 if buried

*paper is partially acid, so acidic soils do not affect it as quickly as alkaline
 
  • #517
  • #518
  • #519
This is a local case for me, and maybe these things have been posted already. Nancy Grace just gave me the last straw. In her broadcast tonight she repeatedly called Fairfield "Fairfax" She also referred to Phuong's watch as a necklace. The worst part was saying "Fairfax" is an upscale part of the Napa Valley. None of this is accurate and I am angered with her sensationalism. I appreciate that she gets the word out there, but today has really been unbelievable.

Thanks for sharing the local information.

This is a minor thing, but it's bugging me no end! NG keeps calling the bookstore Barnes & Noble's :banghead: I've never heard anyone, anywhere add an "s" to Noble, but NG continues to do this each time the case is featured on her show.

Like I said, a minor thing, but it's getting to me.
 
  • #520
Does anyone have any guesses as to who might be a logical POI in this case?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
64
Guests online
2,785
Total visitors
2,849

Forum statistics

Threads
633,220
Messages
18,638,113
Members
243,451
Latest member
theoiledone
Back
Top