http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50E14FA3E5F0C718EDDA80894D9484D81&n=Top%2fNews%2fU%2eS%2e%2fU%2eS%2e%20States%2c%20Territories%20and%20Possessions%2fCaliforniajulieL said:I have always wondered about that because quite a few people; (children, teens, and adults) were being probated to synanon at that time (and there were many studies and observations going on at the same time where people in the judicial system and psychs for example would observe our schools, basic training, and other programs. Also the Hustlers who were all over the country getting donations of food, clothes, money ,etc were actively putting out the word that Synanon was avalable to accept problem children and adults. Some probated through the courts. Many others put there by their parents. I will ask some more questions re did synanon notify courts once people left. always wondered about that myself. even for the adults.
is one article which appears elsewhere as well about a person who was probated to Synanon, left, came back and apparently legal charges were associated based on a kidnapping.
In this second article, a person injured after a former probated Synanon member left and then went on a crime spree is noted here and whether Synanon was responsible for ensuring the safety of others because a probated member has left....
http://www.times-standard.com/local/ci_3697639
Attorneys for the teens also argued that the two cases cited by the
corporations -- Cardenas v. Eggleston Youth Center
and Beauchene v. Synanon Foundation Inc. -- were based on general
allegations of negligence, not specific actions.