- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 3,004
- Reaction score
- 20,100
Does "phone stopped communicating" mean it was no longer traceable? Battery dead or removed? Or shut off? Sorry for sounding dumb, but I really am when it comes to techy stuff.
![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That basically happened over 2 miles in front of their house and actually that incident with the very long follow up is part of why I think LE prioritized themselves to respond slowly to that. That would be mighty crazy to wait 12 days to get information from a witness and then after almost two weeks to drag the husband along for that. There's also no mention there of KP having any involvement other than being a listed contact, like what it says on all the Papini-related entries.
Does "phone stopped communicating" mean it was no longer traceable? Battery dead or removed? Or shut off? Sorry for sounding dumb, but I really am when it comes to techy stuff.
There are two incidents in that screenshot. The first one is behind the Papini house. It states this in the log.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It could be lost wifi/gps, battery died, removed or turned off.Does "phone stopped communicating" mean it was no longer traceable? Battery dead or removed? Or shut off? Sorry for sounding dumb, but I really am when it comes to techy stuff.
But the "behind the house" info is just for another reporting party and has been on every log on this case since at least 11/5. I don't think this is anything significant.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thanks. I hadn't seen that video before. LINK.
Just to clarify, because I've seen it mentioned quite a few times now with puzzlement:
"they've dumped both the cell phones" means that they took a complete image of all the storage on the phones. Backed them up, basically, so that no info can be lost. I would assume phones is plural because they did both Sherri's and Keith's.
I'm not sure the statement "her cell phone connections went dead around noon," should be taken to mean the phone went dead.
I'm thinking he meant that they don't see any user input after noon. ie, no texts, phone calls, or app use.
He also says, "[the husband] ended up pinging her phone," which isn't quite an accurate way of saying what happened there, either. So what he is saying needs to be taken with a grain of salt.
There are two incidents in that screenshot. The first one is behind the Papini house. It states this in the log.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you're referring to the 'Her Mother Lives Behind MP RESD,' that's part of the generic entry that's been on there for ages, like it said that same thing in the report about clothing in a ditch on Holiday/Old Oregon on 11/7.
His choice of words, "her cell phone connections went dead" isn't very helpful, for sure.Considering the find my phone was working I assume it was traceable..I'm wondering if it just means she wasn't responding?
If you're referring to the 'Her Mother Lives Behind MP RESD,' that's part of the generic entry that's been on there for ages, like it said that same thing in the report about clothing in a ditch on Holiday/Old Oregon on 11/7.
It could be lost wifi/gps, battery died, removed or turned off.
The Find my phone app will log the last place the phone had Internet connections. This means the phone was near the mailbox location when it lost connections and remained there until Keith found it.
If anyone happened upon it and thought "free iphone", taking it with them, Keith would have been led to the mailbox location, but the phone would have been gone.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
Right but I'm reading two different subjects with different reporting party's for each and both say follow up, as if they're following up on both reports. Just the way I'm seeing it. I may be wrong.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
His choice of words, "her cell phone connections went dead" isn't very helpful, for sure.
I'm thinking the 11:00 AM sighting might be valid. She was taken and her phone placed out in that location by the abductor.
I have an android phone and I can see if my texts were read. Can you do that on an IPhone? In any event that seems to suggest she may not have seen Keith's text at 1:39 narrowing the time frame and why they started saying late morning/ early afternoon.
Sent from my SM-G928T using Tapatalk
There are two incidents in that screenshot. The first one is behind the Papini house. It states this in the log.
Considering the find my phone was working I assume it was traceable..I'm wondering if it just means she wasn't responding?
Thank you! Like I said we really need to be careful making assumptions based on the call logs. The 'comment' after a persons name is just a description or 'note'. That persons mom lives behind the Papini house. That is how she is associated with the case. She has had the same description from other logs along with Papini family relatives having their own description.
Same as the same vehicles being mentioned over and over on the logs regarding follow ups.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk