I have not posted here in a while but I have been reading all of the posts since the arrest of Antolin.
I have some issues with the constant flow of misleading and conflicting information in this case. I also think that given the very few facts we have regarding Antolins' involvement in this case, it is unfortunate that everyone has decided he is guilty. If you disagree with me, and would like to read my own take on this issue, take a peek at my blog entitled thequeenofscrutiny.com
http://thequeenofscrutiny.com ( I hope I did not just violate any posting rules for the board by mentioning the link. If so please remove and accept my apology.)
A few points for consideration:
I wonder if the police may be aware of more than one person involved in this situation, and have decided to put the screws to Antolin in order to get him to roll over on the other person. If there is gang involvement, there is very little chance of ATG saying anything to police.
Other possibilities:
What if Sierra was walking and Antolin accidentally hit her with his car? Hotsteno had mentioned way back around the time she went missing that her mother had to pick up glass out of the street from a car accident.
We are fairly certain that he had some contact with her, but to what extent we do not know.
I am just thinking that the big reveal that we are hoping and praying for from the Sheriff's office may not materialize. I think if they had something more damning, they would have already released the information.
I just find it amusing that the same people who were certain that Marlene LaMar was somehow involved in her disappearance are now just as certain that Antolin is guilty.
A few of the comments I have read on this forum demonstrate how the perception that ATG's family is
"ghetto" is directly related to your presumption of him being a murderer. I looked at his myspace page and the facebook pages of his family. I saw nothing that looked "ghetto", but largely hardworking, family oriented people.
Even if he is guilty, I still don't think that passing judgement on his family is fair.
I just wish that we could get a clear statement of the facts from the SCCS office rather than a few facts sparsely distributed in a sea of discrepancies.
JMO and MOO :moo:
1st RBBM: I agree ... With respect to the "
misleading and conflicting information", it is one thing to
"protect the investigation" and it is another thing to
"lie" or continuously state "
mistruths" ...
The MSM is "excluded" here because the only thing I find the media "guilty" of is "very sloppy reporting" ...
2nd RBBM: I agree ...
- The "Statement of Facts" issued by the SO has information in it that canNOT be corroborated by a "witness" other than the 2 people living IN the home with Sierra at the time she disappeared ...
- The "Statement of Facts" does NOT have information that was previously reported ... there are "holes" that need to be filled in ... JMO, but these "holes" are there for a reason ...
- The "Statement of Facts" state the dog traced the scent to the "mid-way down her street" -- that is NOT what was previously reported -- it was to the "end of the driveway" ...
- The "Statement of Facts" state the "inhaler", Sierra's "money", "house keys", and "clothing Sierra was wearing the morning she went missing" have been LOCATED ...
I sure would like to know WHERE the inhaler, house keys and money were LOCATED, and if this "money" was in Sierra's wallet ...
And as to the "clothes Sierra was wearing the morning she went missing", HOW did they determine this when NOBODY saw what clothes Sierra was wearing the morning went missing ? Marlene said that when she left the home, Sierra was in PAJAMAS. So "who knows" what Sierra REALLY was wearing ... afterall, Sierra could have been wearing one of her friend's clothes because Marlene said Sierra and her firends would "borrow" each other's clothes ...
- The "Statement of Facts" IMO is "weak" ... DNA Evidence is "Circumstancial Evidence" ... and YES, LE is keeping some evidence out of the Statement, possibly pending forensic tests, etc. ... or is LE and the DA "hoping" to have a "murder weapon", a "crime scene", a "body" by the time this goes to trial ?
That's a lot to "bet on" IMO ...
So WHAT is this "Direct Evidence" they have ? Is it a "video" of Sierra IN that red Jetta owned by Antolin ? They better have that otherwise, their case is weak ...
BBM: I agree ... from what we have heard so far, his family had nothing to do with Sierra being missing ...
JMO and MOO ... It could be this dude Antolin did do something to Sierra -- maybe he did or maybe he didn't MOO .... It is My Opinion that the evidence is weak and a "perp" is NOT going to leave the cell phone, JC Handbag and school books in a place where they could easily be found !
A perp is NOT going to leave a "trail" and is going to dispose of these items in a dumpter, trashcan or body of water where the likelihood of them being found is extremely low ...
While I totally understand they can bring a case forward for "murder" and "kidnapping" withOUT a body, the FACT there is NO murder weapon, NO blood and NO body, does NOT look good for the DA ...
SO IF this IS their dude, they better have some "direct evidence" or a defense attorney is going to have a "field day" planting "reasonable doubt" in the minds of the jury ...
According to the TOS, it is okay to have "conflicting viewpoints and/or opinions" ... but it is NOT okay to "bash the poster" ...
JMO and :moo::moo::moo: