GrainneDhu
Verified Expert
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2010
- Messages
- 5,159
- Reaction score
- 58
I have a procedural question. So LE tests the bag for fingerprints, likely tested the phone too (same set of fingerprints found on two items), runs them through the database and gets a match for ATG. Before the very first time they speak to him, would they have ALL the necessary warrants on them to search the car, the trailer, etc? ie they just show up without warning and say, 'Open your trunk, we have a warrant? Hand over your cell phone.'
Because if ATG is used to getting away with stuff and maybe done similar things before he may have had no clue they were coming for him. He could have cleaned up the car, but a taser or knife could have been in the glove compartment for his next attempt.
Just saying the element of surprise would have been crucial in gathering the most evidence. Would LE have just gone to talk to him without all the documents in hand?
I think it all depends and the general public won't find out until the trial.
Going in with warrants immediately would lower the risk of evidence tampering.
However, going to talk to him in a sort of buddy-buddy style, "we know this is ridiculous but your name came up so we have to jump through these hoops" type of manner could get him pinned to answers that could help get him convicted. Assume he's going to make up a story, let him tell it and then use it to pin him in court.
So I can see LE going either way.