- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,893
- Reaction score
- 126,777
I have asked myself the very same questions. I am not knowledgeable or experienced enough in the legal side to know if such misleading behavior would be illegal/unethical.
One thing that did get me thinking--perhaps LE discouraged the civilian searches for this very reason--there was nothing left to be found. However, I fully admit that I think it more probably that the former officer I am speaking of was perhaps speculating or had heard a rumor and taken it to be fact. I am, however, somewhat surprised at just the lack of information...it might be just me, but it seems like, with most other cases, such as Tori Stafford for instance, there are usually updates given on searches taking place, speculative theories etc... but the only news I have noted regarding the case is that LE expanded the investigation into Mexico which is very old news at this point...
A retired CPS officer should not be given details about an on-going investigation, but he probably has good insights into the information that has been released.
Regarding the release of investigative information that was forthcoming while Victoria Stafford was missing ... and until the arrest ... that is also true in this case. Information was released until the arrest. The search took much longer with Tory Stafford, but the details of the kidnapping, the complicity, the violence, and the pre-meditation were not released until trial. Everything is the same as this case ... requests for help from the public until there is an arrest, then nothing until trial.