Given that the psychiatrist who met with Garland once a week was completely unable to understand his state of mind, someone deserves a full refund.
That would be Alberta health care.
Given that the psychiatrist who met with Garland once a week was completely unable to understand his state of mind, someone deserves a full refund.
Agreed, however, how reliable is that information from DG? His mother has told us he had a breakdown at University. He sees a psychiatrist every Monday. How much stock can we put into DG's information?
Psychiatric care is covered by health care. Psychologists are not but Psychiatrists are.
It's unlikely healthcare would pay for this kind of expensive weekly consult. Psychiatrists mainly consult these days, and may see a patient once to diagnose or prescribe, their hourly is astronomical.
It could be the family paid for his care out of pocket.
In my opinion, Garland did not 'go over the edge'..........the evidence shows a pattern of a life that has been not normal.
My opinion about the weekly psychiatrist visits:
I work in mental health care in another Canadian province. My understanding is that weekly/biweekly visits used to be the norm in psychiatric care, but nowadays the model has changed to the psychiatrists doing much less frequent care or even just consults. However, I've noticed that patients who had been seen weekly for many, many years got to continue to continue their frequent visits.
My speculation: DG has been under psychiatric care for around 30 years, since the "breakdown" in university. An ongoing mental health condition would explain him still living with his parents and never holding down a job. I wonder if the nature of his psychiatric illness will come out in trial?
DG isn't claiming to be Not Criminally Responsible for the crimes, is he?