CANADA Canada - Audrey Gleave, 73, Ancaster ON, 30 Dec 2010 #8

[Deleted member 102539]

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/21/man-in-graveside-sex-assault-high-risk-to-reoffend-court-told
By Sam Pazzano ,Toronto Sun

" Monday, October 21, 2013 07:54 PM EDT | Updated: Monday, October 21, 2013 08:00 PM EDT
Russell Kirkpatrick. Russell Kirkpatrick pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault and choking a 61-year-old woman in July 12, 2010, at Pine Hills Cemetery in Scarborough."



TORONTO - A homeless man who savagely beat and sexually assaulted a woman visiting her mother’s grave is rated an extremely high risk to strike again, a Superior Court heard Monday.

Crown attorney Megan Petrie is seeking to have Russell Kirkpatrick declared a dangerous offender and jailed indefinitely as a signifcant threat to women.

His latest offence was a vicious attack on a 61-year-old woman in July 2010 that left her face so swollen and battered that she was virtually unrecognizable.

He pleaded guilty last year to aggravated sexual assault and choking — the latest of a string of violent crimes on his criminal record.

A psychiatric assessment filed Monday rated Kirkpatrick, 47, in the second-highest category of risk for repeat sexual offenders, indicating 89% of his group re-offended within 10 years"

What a monster!!

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

I'm still here daily but I have nothing to add. Still suspecting young and close.

:cupcake:

 

[dotr]

Speaking of "young and close' (well, under 2 hours away from AG.) horrors allegedly committed by one young male and two females, against children, dogs and horses.

http://www.torontosun.com/2013/10/26/second-woman-faces-16-charges-in-child-sex-abuse-case

"One woman says she was devastated to learn that her dog and horse were allegedly abused sexually.

“I know they are not human beings,” says the woman as she wrapped her arms around her dog. “But to me, they are part of my family.”

The Toronto Sun was given the woman’s name by a source and, while she would prefer to have her full name published in connection with this story, her identity as a possible victim is protected under a publication ban.

A month ago, OPP officers knocked on her door, asking her questions about her pets, she said. The officers then told her people had been charged with abusing them.

“I felt so betrayed,” said the woman.

She said her big, lovable dog seems as “happy and goofy” as ever, but her horse has been timid and shy.

“He’s not right,” she said. “It seems like he is afraid ... I just need to know what happened."

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

General Musings and Some Pertinent Thoughts/Unexplained Things:

As I sit here on Sunday afternoon watching our beloved parrots playing, it dawned on me -------> why on earth didn't AG make arrangements in her Will for her dear dogs? SPECIFIC instructions! That was perhaps the first thing my husband and I considered when drawing up our Will. After all, our parrots are living, breathing beings in need of food and water and shelter and love. We thought of their well-being above money, belongings, etc.

This makes no sense whatsoever in AG's Will. Or, should I say lacking in her Will. :tantrum:

Another problem with the Will is the lack of a person(s) to look after AG's financial matters in case of becoming incapacitated.

And what about naming someone to take care of AG's body/person in case of hospitalisation? What about someone to make that big decision --------> to have doctors offer "dramatic heroics" or to prove that AG wanted a "DNR (Do Not Recussitate") in case of terminal care?

AG was an extremely intelligent woman/scientist. Surely these notions must have crossed her mind! :tantrum:

[modsnip]

Now, back to the cake (Yes, I hear your loud groaning!:scared. Where was the cake as PK entered the garage code? Surely not on the muddy, cold ground. Surely not on the hood of his car which would be somewhat dirty from the winter weather debris hitting the car while he was making the trip to AG's. How did he 'juggle' the cake and enter the code at the same time? Was the cake on a lovely china/ceramic plate decorated with Xmas designs? (I would say yes to this because AK is a chef and she would want to "do it up right"/presentation.) Was a little Xmas card attached? Was the cake covered with a cake-dome or Saran Wrap or Tin Foil? Wouldn't the K couple want to keep the cake clean for a woman who had just been "under the weather"? Did PK leave the cake in the car prior to entering the garage code thinking once the garage door opens, he'd run back to grab the cake? That would presume he left the car door open in order to easily pick up the cake.

Now, after all of that --------> what did happen to the cake once PK saw AG on the garage floor? If it was still in his car, did he just drive back home with it in a dazed state? If that was the case, how did he explain to LE that the cake was the purpose of his trip that day?

I'm done for now................:websleuther: ullhair: :websleuther:

 

[colette]

German Shepherds only live 8-13 yrs, whereas some parrots can live up to 95 yrs. Maybe she thought she would outlive her dogs.

 

[Deleted member 102539]

General Musings and Some Pertinent Thoughts/Unexplained Things:

As I sit here on Sunday afternoon watching our beloved parrots playing, it dawned on me -------> why on earth didn't AG make arrangements in her Will for her dear dogs? SPECIFIC .....................................................

..........................................

Now, after all of that --------> what did happen to the cake once PK saw AG on the garage floor? If it was still in his car, did he just drive back home with it in a dazed state? If that was the case, how did he explain to LE that the cake was the purpose of his trip that day?

I'm done for now................:websleuther: ullhair: :websleuther:

Stone, you are sooo right!
Your questions I can't answer, sorry.

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

German Shepherds only live 8-13 yrs, whereas some parrots can live up to 95 yrs. Maybe she thought she would outlive her dogs.

With all due respect, that makes no sense at all. "Outliving" is one thing. What about the chance of accidents or the complete unknown (like being murdered).

In my humble opinion, NO pet lover would be so careless. Especially someone as intelligent and precise as AG.

No......I can't buy that one.

:twocents:

 

[Woodland]

With all due respect, that makes no sense at all. "Outliving" is one thing. What about the chance of accidents or the complete unknown (like being murdered).

In my humble opinion, NO pet lover would be so careless. Especially someone as intelligent and precise as AG.

No......I can't buy that one.

:twocents:

Very much agree NSU - especially since the Will was supposedly written in 2007 when the dogs were 3 years younger.

No provision for the pets was one of the first things that stood out for the lawyer that obtained the copy of AG's Will posted here. It's what people traditionally do, including expressing a wish to be buried with their pets, whether that can be done or not.

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

Indeed, Woodland. If we go by the "outliving" theory -------> perhaps my husband and I will live well into our 100's and there would be no need to have the parrots in our Will. How reckless would that be? And how unkind to the birds/animals?

AG did say she wanted to be buried with her dear dogs but (if I recall correctly??) that wish was not in the Will.

In our Will we not only have made arrangements for where our parrots will go to be loved and fed and sheltered, but we have also stated clearly where they will be laid to rest.

This Will by AG simply makes no sense whatsoever. Especially regarding her beloved doggies.

:tantrum:

 

[colette]

With all due respect, that makes no sense at all. "Outliving" is one thing. What about the chance of accidents or the complete unknown (like being murdered).

In my humble opinion, NO pet lover would be so careless. Especially someone as intelligent and precise as AG.

No......I can't buy that one.

:twocents:

What are you trying to say? Someone else wrote her will in 2007?

 

[SideKick]

:facepalm:
Why on earth didn't we think of that before!? Seems so perfect, to have come up with that Stone. Her 'babies' were her beloved dogs. Also, what about a living will, or is that only if one has a spouse/partner? Directions as you say, to deal with any disabilities, illness she may encounter before death.

The .......cake.......

The darn cake eh, just won't go away and that's because it probably holds the clue. I cannot fathom how in the world PK would handle the cake upon finding AG... Seriously.

Has anyone called in our JV 'he could have been involved' call yet to the police? Explain all we felt maybe a suspect? They have to know!!

:seeya:

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

What are you trying to say? Someone else wrote her will in 2007?

I'm trying to say what SideKick just said........AG's dogs "were her babies" just as our parrots are OUR babies! A loving parent to children or pets always thinks of the pets/children first.

In my opinion, AG would never have neglected to make plans for her beloved dogs in the event of her death......even if it was untimely. AG loved her dogs; she visited the graves of those who had passed on; she got medicines from the vet; she took them in her car; they were her constant companions. Heck, she wanted to be buried near them!!

I suppose I'm saying that the Will is really "fishy". Something isn't sitting right with the Will. :fish:

While I'm on the topic of Wills/finances......did AG have a financial advisor? We have one and one of the first things our advisor mentioned (when we were thinking of getting a Will made up) was that we must make arrangements for our birds.

And to SideKick - yes, it is always going to come back to the cake. And also back to the 'inconsistencies' in PK's polygraph to LE.

:twocents:

---------------------------

ETA: I found this:

http://www.petfinder.com/dogs/bringing-a-dog-home/providing-pets-future/

Now, AG's dogs would have barked loudly in case she fell ill in the house and someone would have heard them. But, we have stickers on the front and back doors that indicate BIRDS INSIDE in the event of fire, accident, we fall ill, etc.

 

[roseofsharon]

LV was the beneficiary of AG's estate, but was LV AG's Power of Attorney for financial matters and personal care, IF AG became incompetent.

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

^^^^^^^ That's a really great question! And if not LV, was anyone given Power of Person (not sure if that's the right phrase :blushing in the event of AG becoming incapacitated??????????????????

 

[Woodland]

That is a good question rose - I don't think POA's are normally filed with a Will, at least there were none to retrieve with AG's Will. By the time one needs someone's Will, the need for the POA is over.

We can only guess at this point if POA's were attached when Hrab found AG's Will or not.

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

More Musings......

Do we know WHY PK was late in delivering the cake? A reason? Yes, he had to drop off AK at work but would that cause an hour's delay?

Also, PK said (if memory serves) that he phoned AG to say he'd be late. Wasn't he alarmed when she failed to answer the phone? Especially when AG had been "under the weather" for a few days.

:cake4u:

About the Will:

Was the Will divided into 'groupings"? Or did it simply say (paraphrasing) that the entire shebang goes to LV? (Please excuse my memory here. :blushing

For example I'll use our Will:

- arrangements for our birds (one person and her husband)
- arrangements for artwork (a friend)
- arrangements my (very few) gold rings (my girlfriend who understands the importance of the few pieces)
- arrangements for animal/nature charities (the bulk of our property/estate)
- arrangements for my French language books (a friend who loves French Lit)

My problem here is that AG was very precise and she liked lovely things (the CAR!!). Wouldn't she want different people to have different things? Maybe someone who would cherish any artwork would not care to have the car.

For the life of me, I cannot understand that AG would treat a Will with carelessness. And like AG, we do not have children. Rather, we have "fids" = "feathered kids".

:rolling:

 

[Sillybilly]

I don't know why i'm having trouble reconciling these comments from PK's post at:
Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community - View Single Post - Audrey Gleave, retired teacher, viciously murdered in home, Ancaster Ontario, #2

@ Hazel (#530)
- Great point!!! When I was in the house a few days later (before the cleaning had started) it didn't seem like two dogs had been unattended in the house for any extended period of time!

-and-

@ No_Stone_Unturned (#477)
- The garage was connected to the house by a door. I'm sorry I can't really comment on whether I think she was dragged out of the house… when LE had me revisit the garage after her body was removed to try and identify missing objects, I didn't see any streaks between the door to the house and where she was found

-and-

@ dotr (#520)
- I'm not sure! (For obvious reasons) I didn't go inside the house so I'm not sure where the dogs were confined

The above aren't necessarily in chronological order, so i'm interpreting that he was not in the house at any time between December 30 and Jan 4 when the crime scene was released.

So, when the crime scene was released, I wonder how PK and LV were in touch in order for PK to know that the cleaning crew was coming over. Did they have each other's phone numbers and who called who in order for PK to attend before the cleaning crew arrived ... and if everything was basically being disposed of, why would LV contact PK to come over or conversely, why would PK call LV?

On another note, i saw somewhere that JV's dad was from Brantford and I don't know when he/they moved away from there. IIRC, PK attended Brantford High, so am just wondering if JV and PK knew each other through school or possibly just through LV.

 

[Woodland]

Just for clarity NSU - PK does not say LE took him inside the house. Only the garage where PK had already been when he found AG.

 

[Woodland]

Good points SB.

PK most certainly would know where AG confined her dogs when she needed to, especially if space was a little limited.

PK also said he did not see any footprints leading from the garage - to either the house or outside. Have no idea how that could be pulled off with a stabbing and other horrors inflicted on someone. Unless one had a backpack with fresh shoes to put on.

 

[No_Stone_Unturned]

Just for clarity NSU - PK does not say LE took him inside the house. Only the garage where PK had already been when he found AG.

Thanks! I got mixed up with PK saying he was in the house before the clean-up. So now........WHY was he in the house before the clean-up?

:blushing: