- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 5,638
- Reaction score
- 24,357
This is terribly Square One-ish of me, but I can't fathom, based on body positioning at the time of discovery, how m/s was initially accepted as the likeliest scenario.
In a case full of nagging questions, it's the one that nags the most.
If Honey had been found as she was, but Barry was found hanging, that's a scene that would immediately seem to spell m/s, though it would not necessarily mean m/s took place.
Murder made to look like M/S.
If the bodies were found exactly as has been made public, to me, that calls for a deep probe long before any conclusion can be drawn and...made public.
I feel exactly the same way.
The Toronto Star made it sound as if they and the second private autopsy changed the ruling from m/s to m/m. If true, that should be publicly cleared up. (In addition to the delays in interviewing witnesses and obtaining and reviewing CCTV footage.)
True Crime Garage in their podcast theorized that Honey’s murder is the X factor: find out the motive for killing her and it will lead to the murderer(s).
I would add to that find out who would benefit from it looking like a m/s.
These podcasts are older and have been posted here before, but for reference:
Barry and Honey Sherman /// Part 1 /// 210 from True Crime Garage
Barry and Honey Sherman /// Part 2 /// 211 from True Crime Garage