But this person is a "suspect" because of his movements. That includes being in the area of the deaths at the time of the deaths for a "suspicious amount of time."
Yes I accept that. But what if the individual has an explanation that clears him/her?
But this person is a "suspect" because of his movements. That includes being in the area of the deaths at the time of the deaths for a "suspicious amount of time."
But this person is a "suspect" because of his movements. That includes being in the area of the deaths at the time of the deaths for a "suspicious amount of time."
on the "strange walk" person........ what time/day was he/she right at or very near the Sherman property?.... were police able to pin down "time of death" very closely? I'm thinking "no"
Like what??Yes I accept that. But what if the individual has an explanation that clears him/her?
Detectives sought ‘tower dump’ of all cellular communication around Barry and Honey Sherman’s home, Barry’s office, documents reveal
''Dec. 27, 2021
The Toronto Star has won access in court to police investigative documents in the now four-year old, unsolved Barry and Honey Sherman murder case. Last week, we detailed the results of the first year of the homicide probe, how intensive interviews with Sherman family, friends and business associates led detectives to check 35 cellular telephones to see if their owners were stalking the Shermans. In today’s instalment, the Star reveals how empty-handed investigators decided to cast a wider net.
If you were on the streets around the Toronto home of murder victims Barry and Honey Sherman on July 25, 2018, you would have seen a youngish-looking Toronto police officer making a series of calls on a cellular telephone, then methodically recording the results in a notebook. That was Det.-Const. Dennis Yim of the Toronto police homicide unit.''
![]()
The way I understood it.. they've identified everyone in the area caught on various video cams, except for this one individual.. but they seem to have discovered 'mundane' reasons for all (or I believe I read 'most' at one time?) of those people to have been in the area at the time.. so if this one individual ends up being identified and has a valid reason for being there and doing what he's seen doing, they'd have to go back to dig deeper into all of those other identified persons' mundane reasons. jmo.Yes I accept that. But what if the individual has an explanation that clears him/her?
I have to summarize to comply with the copyright rule (emphasis mine):
- Barry was tied at the wrists before he died. (My note: KD doesn’t say that Honey was also tied in this article).
-Both Shermans were strangled with a thin ligature.
-after they were killed, they were placed onto the position in which they were found, kept in place by belts attached to the pool railing.
-Honey and Barry were both wearing shoes. KD wrote that Sherman family and friends were asked what footwear Honey and Barry wore on the home, but the answers were inconclusive. (My note: Alex seemed to recall. Quote from previous Star article— “Police also interviewed daughter Alexandra (Alex) Sherman and her husband Brad Krawczyk. (The couple have since separated). In her interview, Alex is asked about shoes and she says her mother wore a pair of “black slip-on shoes” in the house and outside the home.” People had reason to ‘hurt’ Barry and Honey Sherman, son tells Toronto police in early days of the investigation )
-Barry had his glasses on, undisturbed.
-The video that the police released is the last point they caught the suspect on cctv. He is referred to as ‘the suspected killer’ in police documents.
(My note—my impression is that the killer had a burner phone based on the excerpt dotr posted above.)
Like what??
How does that make any sense? For example, If the walker was visiting from overseas and staying at one of the Sherman’s neighbours surely it would have potentially saved LE a couple of years of work by asking the Sherman’s neighbours if they knew or had seen this person!
I just don’t get it.
IMO, there has been A LOT of miss steps with the police department in this case. It's almost like they are trying to NOT solve this case. My irrational side of me thinks they are connected to this hit man....my common sense tells me I watch to many crime shows with dirty cops lol...
Nobody said he left at midnight.. the '9pm to midnight' window is the timeframe for the murders which was assumed by Kevin Donovan, since police told him they believe the couple died on December 13th (and it's the 13th only until midnight), and we've been told B penned his final email at around 8:30pm from his office, before heading home. The murders could've happened anytime within those hours, could've taken a short time or a longer time, could've been done one right after the other, or spread apart a bit more, could've left right away afterwards or hung around for a bit (doubtful?). LE haven't disclosed actual times this 'night walker' was seen in the area.Does anybody have an answer for the question as to what the killer was doing in the house for three hours if he truly left at midnight? If Barry got home at 9 PM wouldn’t he have been killed instantly? What was going on in there?
Just FYI for those that want to read the full article, it also appears at this link where there is no paywall (in addition to several others as well). ETA: I didn't realize, but it seems the original article also has no paywall:Detectives sought ‘tower dump’ of all cellular communication around Barry and Honey Sherman’s home, Barry’s office, documents reveal
''Dec. 27, 2021
The Toronto Star has won access in court to police investigative documents in the now four-year old, unsolved Barry and Honey Sherman murder case. Last week, we detailed the results of the first year of the homicide probe, how intensive interviews with Sherman family, friends and business associates led detectives to check 35 cellular telephones to see if their owners were stalking the Shermans. In today’s instalment, the Star reveals how empty-handed investigators decided to cast a wider net.
If you were on the streets around the Toronto home of murder victims Barry and Honey Sherman on July 25, 2018, you would have seen a youngish-looking Toronto police officer making a series of calls on a cellular telephone, then methodically recording the results in a notebook. That was Det.-Const. Dennis Yim of the Toronto police homicide unit.''
![]()
I have to summarize to comply with the copyright rule (emphasis mine):
- Barry was tied at the wrists before he died. (My note: KD doesn’t say that Honey was also tied in this article).
-Both Shermans were strangled with a thin ligature.
-after they were killed, they were placed onto the position in which they were found, kept in place by belts attached to the pool railing.
-Honey and Barry were both wearing shoes. KD wrote that Sherman family and friends were asked what footwear Honey and Barry wore on the home, but the answers were inconclusive. (My note: Alex seemed to recall. Quote from previous Star article— “Police also interviewed daughter Alexandra (Alex) Sherman and her husband Brad Krawczyk. (The couple have since separated). In her interview, Alex is asked about shoes and she says her mother wore a pair of “black slip-on shoes” in the house and outside the home.” People had reason to ‘hurt’ Barry and Honey Sherman, son tells Toronto police in early days of the investigation )
-Barry had his glasses on, undisturbed.
-The video that the police released is the last point they caught the suspect on cctv. He is referred to as ‘the suspected killer’ in police documents.
(My note—my impression is that the killer had a burner phone based on the excerpt dotr posted above.)