Thanks for sharing these stats. Early on I felt strongly that the perp was someone who acted on a need/desire to erase him. Destroy all his awards, work, his belongings, his protector (service dog) and home. Gender didn’t come to mind at the time.
I do wonder if LE look into POIs with gender biases or if it’s strictly mapped out by degrees of contact.
I looked up more stats about WLU Faculty of Social Work graduate program on Peterson app used by students to prep for tests and choose courses and schools.
The Numbers for Laurier's MSW
According to recent demographic data for the Lyle S. Hallman Faculty of Social Work:
Female Students: Approximately
85%
Male Students: Approximately
14-15%
Faculty: The gender split among faculty is slightly more balanced but still majority female (roughly
70% female).
Link
Also, the arson could be an orderly act of undoing the primary crime or an act of total destruction. This is another area where gender biases or profiling can occur when interviewing people with degrees of contact with a victim.
Inner Circle: Partner/spouse, family, housemates (highest statistical likelihood).
Middle Circle: Close friends, fellow students, coworkers, or recent professional contacts (like a social worker or client).
Outer Circle: Acquaintances or people with a "fleeting" motive.
On top of this would be the online circle of friends or member of groups they belonged to.