I suspect that this trial will result in them receiving a more significant sentence.
The mother of a toddler who died of bacterial meningitis seven years ago didn’t believe her son had the deadly disease, she testified Wednesday at her trial.
But Collet Stephan admitted she thought 18-month-old Ezekiel could have had viral meningitis, even though she and her husband, David, believed in the weeks leading up to the child’s death that he was only suffering from croup.
During cross-examination Wednesday by Crown prosecutor Joshua Chan, Collet agreed that based on her later observations of Ezekiel, she had ruled out the possibility her son had bacterial meningitis, but acknowledged it most likely “could” have been viral meningitis.
When Chan asked her if she felt viral meningitis caused her more concern than croup, she simply replied, “no.”
She also agreed with the Crown that she and David had discussed meningitis, but decided not to take Ezekiel to a doctor unless they saw more severe symptoms.
Mother didn't believe son had deadly disease
Here if you call 911 you can't "call them off" they come whether you want them to or not! So that was the first thing that was weird to me. But yeah I'm thinking not going to the hospital when your child quit breathing is definitely neglectful.
Toddler who died of meningitis could have lived if ambulance had proper equipment: medical expert
Toddler who died of meningitis could have lived if ambulance had proper equipment: medical expert
Court has heard how Ezekiel Stephan's parents gave him natural remedies, including smoothies with hot peppers and horseradish because they thought he had croup and the flu
The medical examiner has testified the boy died of bacterial meningitis but Sauvageau said the boy likely had viral meningitis and she has never seen a child die of that form of the disease.
Sauvageau said Ezekiel died because paramedics couldn’t establish an airway quickly and he probably would have been fine if the ambulance had the proper equipment.
He also told the jury that an endotracheal tube managed to provide the child with some oxygen, but it was only partially effective because the tube was also the wrong size. He said by that time the toddler had been without oxygen for more than eight minutes.
David Stephan calls 32-month sentence for Calgary couple “appalling”
Jun 05, 2019
"LETHBRIDGE, AB – A 32-month sentence handed to a Calgary couple convicted of criminal negligence causing death, and failure to provide the necessaries of life in the death of their 14-month old son is “appalling”, says David Stephan....
Speaking during a break in proceedings on Wednesday June 5, Stephan said he had seen the evidence, and couldn’t believe the Clarks would be going to jail."
https://lethbridgenewsnow.com/2019/...-month-sentence-for-calgary-couple-appalling/
From the 2016 trial ...
Dr Sauvageau, said these things in the 2016 trial. At the trial, she was not declared an expert in the area of diagnosis and prognosis.
It seems very odd to me that Dr. S. would state a diagnosis that was contrary to that made by attending expert physicians. It's also odd that her opinion would be allowed in court, since only expert witnesses are allowed to state opinions. Her testimony seems bizarre.
I wasn't able to find out whether or not she testified in this retrial. Can anyone recall?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.