With the way so many things link back to DM I would not be surprised if the following car was DM's Yukon SUV (the one he was picked up in)
Why do you think that?
With the way so many things link back to DM I would not be surprised if the following car was DM's Yukon SUV (the one he was picked up in)
If you are considering a conspiracy that involves someone trying to set DM up for some reason, what reasons could there be?
taken from the HPS media release link posted above BBM - am I the only one left wondering how he knew the suspect had several tattoos on his arms when he was wearing a long sleeve shirt??
I think that is what he wore to TB's house
As for the other seller:
"Police also believe cellphone records show that the pair met up with a separate man and test-drove a vehicle in the Toronto area on Sunday.
Police said the man was immediately suspicious of the pair, who walked up to his business, located in a remote industrial area of Etobicoke.
The man said the taller of the two had several tattoos on his arms, exposed by his short-sleeve t-shirt, but one in particular stood out: a tattoo on his wrist of a rectangle with the word ambition inside."
http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/0...ive-with-two-strange-men-and-never-came-back/
It is unclear to me whether the description of the long sleeved shirt was from him or SB. If they both said long sleeved orange shirt, my question is why a wealthy dude--or anyone for that fact, would wear the same shirt 2 days in a row.
Actually that evening was not that cool and definitely not cool enough for so
meone to have their hoodie up.
taken from the HPS media release link posted above BBM - am I the only one left wondering how he knew the suspect had several tattoos on his arms when he was wearing a long sleeve shirt??
I would doubt that very many people know of the camera's at the fairgrounds...unusual to have them in a Rural area....DM and helpers may not have known...but maybe they did and that's why the second car was driving so close that LE couldn't get a make on it??
what do you mean "I read that as they were planing on a dirty deed prior to arrival. Seize control and cut off comms quickly"
To get rid of the burner phone, would DM have to chuck the phone or just the SIM card?
Been thinking about the truck again...it was that model of truck they seemed to be after so badly. They wanted it with some urgency, needed it quickly for some imminent operation.
ocess. You don't just drive off with the vehicle that day. He needed it urgently.
This is a crimesleuthing board not a court of law. We don't have the power to judge and convict anyone. And we don't have to adhere to the "innocent until proven guilty" code that only applies in a court of law. One thing we do try to do is to gather information on the LE named suspect and try to figure out the why and also the other people involved and how they may connect to the suspect.Originally Posted by Blomquist
I know people want to find the culprit but to be judging and convicting someone without any disclosure or any trial is rather hostile and lacks a sense of true justice imho
Personally, I don't think anyone wanted the truck. I think they were looking for the truck in order to find a person. I think the person was the target, not the truck. In order to find the person, however, they first had to find the truck.
Either TB was mistaken as the person they were looking for or WAS the person they were looking for.
Completely fictional example. Some guys get arrested and at the scene notice a person in a truck driving away with a for sale sign posted on the truck. They learn a concerned citizen called 911 which led to their arrest. They're ticked and don't know who called but they surmise that the occupant of the truck driving away was the one who called 911. To exact their revenge they need to find that truck before they find the person who was driving it that night.
Timing works out 9.20pm TB's Home to Fen Ridge Court where phone was found and phone cut off 10pm if highway 403 is avoided. Approx 30 minutes plus 10 minutes allowing stoppoing for traffic lights.
DM took TB's truck past Ancaster Fairground along Wilson Street West into Brantford then avoiding 403 along Colbourne St East/Dalhousie/Brant Ave/Paris Rd/Hardy Rd/Oak Park Rd/Fen Ridge Court
They would not have stopped off but drove straight to the place where the phone was found.
Someone mentioned a camera at TL a building at the crossroads (Garden Ave/Colbourne St E) picked up the trailing vehicle, LI must know the route taken.
There still remains the fact that DM bought an Eliminator Incinerator with no viable reason to buy one. NONE.
If that were the case, why risk getting caught with the truck, take it out by the reservation and torch it... LE says it was the truck they wanted, not TB.
Here is the written Police Media Release that helps to clarify times, dates, locations AND descriptions.... please take a moment and read it, as we seem to be getting into a rut at times for details that have been made 100% clear.
http://www.hamiltonpolice.on.ca/NR/exeres/FFB9B6D6-BCA8-4945-B476-CCF83824EBB8.htm
Also the 2nd vehicle has NOT been 100% possitively identified as of yet... I will refer you to the LE Video, the entire video is valuable for the facts at they stand but, if you go to the 11 min mark and listen to the 12 min mark, they are still working on the 2nd vehicle...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny87BjsZuv0