Excellent analogy. JB had a plan, and a back up plan in case plan "A" didn't work out. JB POSED as a "Greg Mortenson wannabee". That was his back up plan, IMO. Plan A was "western islamist savior". IMO.
I think this has a lot to do with "why" the U.S. government press release was so stark and non-committal about their status, and didn't mention Canada at all.
Yes, he went of his own free will. IMO, he manipulated/ persuaded/ beguiled her into the trip. She went of her own free will, too.
Many people, in western societies, frequently feel they are "entitled" to make colossally, horribly bad life decisions. The serious problems begin when someone's very bad decisions impact other people. And/ or require substantial tax resources.
Maybe I'm alone in my opinion, but I don't think we should expend government diplomacy, military members and their safety, and substantial resources "rescuing" western private citizens who *intentionally* go to dangerous and violent parts of the world and put themselves in harm's way. They should understand they will be on their own, or appeal to NGOs if they need to be rescued. And I'd feel the same way if it was my own grown child or family member. There should be no expectation the U.S. government will intervene, or mount substantial "rescue" efforts if a citizen CHOOSES to go to a very dangerous and troubled part of the world. Free choice = acceptance of consequences. IMO.