- Joined
- May 20, 2010
- Messages
- 14,077
- Reaction score
- 6,198
So she likely only gave her the full name after seeing that piece of paper, but called her 'Zanny' to Cindy before that .. that's what I'm thinking is most likely.
Need to check Jesse Grund's interview to see if Casey told him and/or his dad the name Zany. I can't remember if she said the name or just said she found a nanny.
Richard Grund
"I never saw her [Zenaida Fernandez-Gonzalez] or spoke to her, but I did hear of her. I heard of her in April of `06, when Casey lost her regular baby-sitter. As I said, Jesse would watch her. I would watch her. She tried to get my high-school-age son to watch her, which meant I watched her because I have an office in my home. Finally, one day when Casey came home from work to wait for Jesse and hang out with us, I kind of greeted her at the door with, What are we going to do about this baby-sitter thing? And she says, I found one. I have a nanny. Her name is Zanny, and I got her from Jeffrey Hopkins, who has a son named..."
http://www.acandyrose.com/caylee_anthony_timeline2006.htm
So 'Zanny', but not ZFG by the looks, yes, so I'm thinking she saw the name on the sign in sheet, and started to formulate the kidnap story, and give Zanny the full name from that .. JMO.
Yes, so Zani, or Zanny prior to seeing the full name at Sawgrass .. then ZFG to police the night Caylee was reported and after that.
All this reminds me that Caylee didn't have contact with any sane people during her short life. They're all NUTS!
Gee her lawyers have their work cut out with her...and they are doing it Pro Bono too...
I wonder how many times they have sifted through documents where SHE has said or written something (like the taped interview, her official statements, the jailhouse videos..) and tried to wrap their minds around her BS...
I'm not sure pro bono is the term I'd use. They aren't charging her, but it's an investment to ensure they can keep working in the future. JMO
Well, I'm back with my 2 cents again.
I don't know where this "baby sitter" stuff came from except for Mitnick using it during the depo.
Here's the thing for me...Everyone and their dog has used the word "Nanny" including FCA all these years which in my opinion gave FCA the outward appearance of being a Mrs Gotrocks cuz she was trying to flaunt herself as having money and the only people I've ever heard of having a Nanny has had the funds to pay their Nanny. So now all of a sudden everyone is using the words "baby sitter" which to me is a nice young lady who lives down the street and sit's for you during an evening out with your husband, who gets payed that night before she returns home.
Am I the only one this bothers?
So nice of her to always remember the males...
True..
He is a member here and we have threads where he came on to "clear the air"
IIRC he said she only visited his apartment (21#) during the time when Annie lived there.
Cliff notes- Dante S. Speaks - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
I'm thinking if she answers these questions truthfully she will lose this case for sure so she is hiding behind the fifth. I do think the judge will make her answer the questions because statutes have just about run out on anything she might reveal. I'm not sure what the time limit is on improper disposal of a body, or anything else that might come out. Is Kronk's case against her still active? jmo
Yep. Maybe he'll pay us a visit if he gets wind of it. Also it kills me that she was angry her mom"interjected herself into the situation" as if caylee had nothing to do with her. Someone once said she's a stupid sociopath . Most can at least fake normal emotions. She couldn't even see it I abnormal to be chipper while your daughter is missing or think your mom should not plead for her
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
She is allowed to plea the 5th if she chooses, even in civil court, as others have pointed out. And a judge is allowed to not take kindly to her pleas, as long as the questions being asked of her relate directly to the civil charges against her.
IMO, her taking the 5th has nothing to do with Kronk's civil defamation case. There weren't any questions in the depo that she refused to answer that had anything to do with Kronk's case.
I think she refused to questions that weren't specifically related to Gonzales because she didn't want to and didn't think she had to. This was just a deposition. My guess is CM and crew are convinced neither defamation case will ever be brought to court, so their strategy is to cooperate just enough to not alienate Judge Roy, but not one question further.