Casey bought the tickets to PR?

  • #161
Airlines and airports. What happens in one, doesn't always happen in the others. Also, what works one day, doesn't 'fly' the next. Ah, no pun intended. Hubby flys alot. So hearing the different out comes on the same stories, doesn't surprise me.

What we need to know, is that sometimes young folks do fly without tickets, without them being documented. Hence, might take a flight, and not have a paper trail

From the reports folks are listing here, that sounds like a possiblity.
They can not get on a flight without being in a reservation system. Period. So there is a paper trail. Ticket or no ticket. A lap child must be on an adult's record...and it will show that they are flying with a child. One of my hats is TA...
 
  • #162
That is also the way it was done back when my kids were little ones.
Absolutely...there are records of everyone onboard. Can you imagine if there was a crash and they didn't know this information?
 
  • #163
Hey RR0004, have you ever seen a case where so many things have been leaked to point in one direction?
With the amount of information that they have, I personally think very little has been leaked. It is what it is. You can't make the evidence disappear I'm afraid.
 
  • #164
With the amount of information that they have, I personally think very little has been leaked. It is what it is. You can't make the evidence disappear I'm afraid.

I just find it odd that anything really has been leaked.
 
  • #165
Airlines and airports. What happens in one, doesn't always happen in the others. Also, what works one day, doesn't 'fly' the next. Ah, no pun intended. Hubby flys alot. So hearing the different out comes on the same stories, doesn't surprise me.

What we need to know, is that sometimes young folks do fly without tickets, without them being documented. Hence, might take a flight, and not have a paper trail

From the reports folks are listing here, that sounds like a possiblity.

Exactly. It's possible. It happens. Maybe it's not supposed to but it DOES.
 
  • #166
Absolutely...there are records of everyone onboard. Can you imagine if there was a crash and they didn't know this information?
before 9/11 the passenger list could have been off, but not anymore.
 
  • #167
Exactly. It's possible. It happens. Maybe it's not supposed to but it DOES.
No, it really doesn't. They count seats for Pete's sake. Attendants know exactly how many people are on a flight. If their count is off, they count again. Around 9/11 there was some serious sh*$ going on with PR. Airlines are very careful with flights going into and through this location.
 
  • #168
  • #169
before 9/11 the passenger list could have been off, but not anymore.
They also became a little crazy about changing seats, but they've relaxed about that now.
 
  • #170
  • #171
Airlines have been cking ID's for a VERY long time now, like since 9/11/01. Dont know where ya'll live but all people young/old have to have id
 
  • #172
I want to just add this as a comment/question. Does anyone think that in this day and time, an unknown child will ever be on a plane to anywhere without being able to be identified?
I just find it impossible to believe that little Caylee has been flown anywhere. Look at Caylee's height. No way would anyone believe that this child could be considered as being under 2 years old and a lapchild. She would have had her own ticket.
I suppose desperate times call for desperate measures. There has been a lot of 'throw everything at a wall and see if anything sticks'! Personally, I think that all of these off beat things are an insult to any logical, sane person.
A certain person/people are toying with us and I am not falling for any of it!
 
  • #173
I want to just add this as a comment/question. Does anyone think that in this day and time, an unknown child will ever be on a plane to anywhere without being able to be identified?
I just find it impossible to believe that little Caylee has been flown anywhere. Look at Caylee's height. No way would anyone believe that this child could be considered as being under 2 years old and a lapchild. She would have had her own ticket.
I suppose desperate times call for desperate measures. There has been a lot of 'throw everything at a wall and see if anything sticks'! Personally, I think that all of these off beat things are an insult to any logical, sane person.
A certain person/people are toying with us and I am not falling for any of it!
You are absolutely correct. Not to worry...I was very aware of that. :blowkiss:
 
  • #174
I hate starting a new thread! But...where is the info that Casey purchased the tickets for that group to go to Puerto Rico? Did this trip effectively clear out Amy's apartment of all roommates? We know Casey had Amy's car--was that apartment empty as well?

Working on a theory here...
 
  • #175
I've been thinking that Caylee was in PR this whole time. People here in NY don't even know she is missing, why not PR folks.

That's strange, since all the national media outlets have covered the case, including CNN and now 20/20. I thought New Yorkers might be a little bit more savvy than that. Ya'll don't get the tabloids up north?
 
  • #176
Airlines and airports. What happens in one, doesn't always happen in the others. Also, what works one day, doesn't 'fly' the next. Ah, no pun intended. Hubby flys alot. So hearing the different out comes on the same stories, doesn't surprise me.

What we need to know, is that sometimes young folks do fly without tickets, without them being documented. Hence, might take a flight, and not have a paper trail

From the reports folks are listing here, that sounds like a possiblity.

There is absolutely no way that a child of 2-3 sitting in a seat would not be required to be ticketed! The only children that fly undocumented are infants on the laps of a ticketed parent. We fly with our children.
 
  • #177
I want to just add this as a comment/question. Does anyone think that in this day and time, an unknown child will ever be on a plane to anywhere without being able to be identified?
I just find it impossible to believe that little Caylee has been flown anywhere. Look at Caylee's height. No way would anyone believe that this child could be considered as being under 2 years old and a lapchild. She would have had her own ticket.
I suppose desperate times call for desperate measures. There has been a lot of 'throw everything at a wall and see if anything sticks'! Personally, I think that all of these off beat things are an insult to any logical, sane person.
A certain person/people are toying with us and I am not falling for any of it!

Guess I'll just beat the dead horse again. I don't believe Caylee was on a plane first of all. The point I was trying to make is that it is POSSIBLE for a child to fly without identification. Yes, it will be noted that a child is flying but that child's name may not be listed. Maybe it's not supposed to happen but it DOES happen and not to just me and my child!!!

I assure you that I am not a member of the Anthony family and I don't know that the other posters who have also flown without listing their children's names (some long time posters her too) are Anthony's. They just aren't participating in the mob mentality that some of you tend to have. There is evidence here stating it is possible and you are dismissing it so you can believe what you want to believe. It doesn't seem intelligent to only acknowledge the evidence that goes along with your particular theory. Yes, I believe there was decomp in the trunk and I also believe that it indicates Caylee may be dead. I also KNOW that a child can fly without their name being listed. Get it!?

Let's just consider ALL the evidence and stop thinking reasoning and rational people are trying to "toy with you" all the time!
 
  • #178
There is absolutely no way that a child of 2-3 sitting in a seat would not be required to be ticketed! The only children that fly undocumented are infants on the laps of a ticketed parent. We fly with our children.

I agree with that. But if they aren't in a seat with a ticket, I think is the significant point being made here. And if the agents don't take a birth certificate they just take your word for the age. As a disorganized younger mom a few years ago, I know for a fact I did not have my son's birth certificate with me. He was 2 and in a stroller when I took him to the counter. They just made note that I had a lap child and did NOT ask me to provide identification. I'm sure this isn't SOP but this happened and has happened to other posters....post 9/11.
 
  • #179
If this was a plausible theory (I'm not sure it is) then if Caylee was only 2 years old at the time then Casey wouldn't have had to purchase a ticket for her as she could have flown as a lap child I believe.

I have a child the same age and she is way too big to do that. No way they didn't ticket a 2-3 year old child. Lapsit infants are usually newborns to (maybe) 18 months. Kids are squirmy.
 
  • #180
I have a child the same age and she is way too big to do that. No way they didn't ticket a 2-3 year old child. Lapsit infants are usually newborns to (maybe) 18 months. Kids are squirmy.

I think the policy is 2 and under fly free actually. My son was a big butterball of a baby and the flights with him were hell but we did it LOL. I fly at least 2-3 times a year and see plenty of lap toddlers so it's possible. Caylee was 2 when she was taken (almost 3). So if this was a viable theory (I don't believe it is), there's a possibility of her flying as a lap child if the attendant doesn't follow policy to a tee.

I don't know that this would have happened multiple times to be flying the child to different cities and not being checked though. I think it's just up to whoever is working the desk if the rules are followed correctly and the chances of that always happening to the same child are slim. But it can happen.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
120
Guests online
2,961
Total visitors
3,081

Forum statistics

Threads
632,580
Messages
18,628,675
Members
243,198
Latest member
ghghhh13
Back
Top