Jean makes me sick. I cannot imagine anyone acting in a more repulsive way towards their spouse and the spuses children by a previous marriage.
When my late fiance died, I took nothing except the money that was in our bank account that his mother knew was specifically for me. I know I had a right to more but would not do that to his children. Because i loved him, i respected his children and knew that their loss was greater than mine. I packed his belongings and made sure they got them. Even before his death, i had no ill will to his first wife and kids. In fact I completely supported all efforts to treat them beyond what the law would require. i was with him because I love and adored him, not because of any financial benefit I stated that very clearly.
My current hubby has 3 adult children and I love them dearly. i have made a point of telling him that he needs to plan for his death and how to deal with that. i do NOT want to inherit our large piece of land and house. It has always been my belief that it belongs to his kids. All i want is the right to live here till i die which is no problem as the property is quite large and we have many acres. The children love me as I do them so I doubt this would ever be a problem.
Jean is just so hideously repulsive to me. What a vile creature she is. I hope that Karma gives what she so richly deserves and she finds that any man who will have her is just after her money and she sees how that feels.
I wonder if she is avoiding going to Washington because she fears being charged with some of the vile things that she has done.
I love you.
This is sickening and just gets worse every day. Although , I am not a fan of the ' state' interfering in family affairs, I wish some ' state' would take custody of Mr . Kasem and at least be sure he is stabilized while this is sorted.
And if we've learned nothing else, we surely have learned how NOT to behave when a loved one is near death. Ridiculous , childish and shameful!
The state (actually, two), has interfered and has ruled in favor of the daughter handling his care. Jean lost her appeal and Mr. Kasem will not be force fed.
http://news.yahoo.com/court-denies-...-him-put-021800790.html?bcmt=comments-postbox
This has been sorted.
gitana1, do you think Jean will end up being charged criminally at the end of this investigation?
I don't know. My hunch is no.
I am kind of surprised at the total one-sidedness of opinions on this situation. Mrs. Kasem is sorta crazy right now, and no one seems to acknowledge that she needs help to get through this thing. She has been married to Casey for 30+ years, and there's no reason to believe it was a loveless marriage.
She's been seeing him die for almost a decade, and as one who has seen a Lewy Body sufferer wither and die, I know how hard that must have been for her. Apparently her religious beliefs make it impossible for her to accept the 'let him die peacefully' idea. Many, many people feel this way- I have those in my family who wanted my MIL to be sustained artificially no matter what (but she had an end of life directive). Casey probably gave his daughter that POA because he knew Jean believed differently. What is little known is that end of life directives are frequently ignored by doctors and hospitals- if family members protest, or if doctors have their own beliefs. Living wills don't always get carried out the way the writer might hope.
And apparently the family relationship was healthy and normal until 2007, unlike some who have claimed that it was bad from day one of the marriage.
I don't believe that the "children" are totally noble and innocent in this sad affair. Nor is Jean. I find it sad that a near-widow is being castigated and made fun of.
Can you please link to support that the family relationship was normal until 2007? Because everything I have read and heard indicates she has not allowed her husbands kids in "her" home since they turned 18, was never a good stepmother when they were little and was estranged from his brother for 33 years.
It is telling that in 2007, right after his diagnosis, he gave the power to his kids, not his wife of 30 years.
Also, I was unaware he has been dying for 10 years. I thought his Parkinson's diagnosis was in 2007 and a diagnosis doesn't equate to dying.
I find her removing him from the hospial, the road trip, and him beng left with virtual strangers reprehensible. I fault Jean for that. But my surprise is that there isn't more fault being laid at Casey's feet for this mess. Thesr are his children and his family and he allowed them to be virtually stripped from his life. If what I've read here is true, and his children weren't allowed in his home after the age of 18 is true, then these problems have got to predate 2007. Signing a document giving someone other than your spouse total medical authority did not make Casey's life easier, it made everyone else's life harder. MOO and unpopular I'm sure.
I have to agree. I know of a few people in this situation right now, who allow their crazy or abusive spouses to have full control and to run rough shod over the children. That is not love for anybody.
He knew, for his whole marriage, that his wife was difficult and rotten to his family and friends. Instead of making excuses for her, saying "she's insecure...she'll come around.", he should have dealt with his mentally ill or cruel wife way back then and refused to allow her to force him to live two separate lives. And he should have had a meeting with everyone present, at which he explains his will and trusts and end of life decisions.
We all have to take responsibility for the decisions we make in life and not leave our families to fight it out when we die or become incapacitated. That's just cowardly passing the buck because one doesn't want to deal with an unpleasant situation.
But since Mr. Kasem is ill and dying, it's hard to get down on him now. Like my dad always used to say, "Ya pa' que?" (Loosely translated, "What's the point now?").