Casey's Diary Entry for June 21st & Missing Pages #1

[Rumpole]

I have seen the photo and it may look entirely different in reality. The pen could have "skipped" and the 08 could very well look like 03. Photos can be misleading.

I'd like to think LE have other evidence to suggest the diary entry is relevant, but the "03" looks Kosher to me.

 

[kiki the parrot]

Sorry, I don't buy that this is a conspiracy against poor Casey.

Never said a "conspiracy against poor KC." I would hate to disillusion anyone, but this is common practice and strategy because unlike defense, prosecution is unable to discuss the case in the media. Commonly known. JMO

arrot:

 

[Gypsy Road]

With all due respect, for those of you who accuse the media of demonizing KC, I have to point out that she has done a pretty good job of doing that herself...starting with not reporting her daughter missing for 31 days. Actually, not reporting her missing it AT ALL. Cindy reported it when she dragged KC home from TL's.

 

[JWG]

And please read my thread here http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3334299#post3334299

where I point out about the ANGEL sitting on top of a piece of paper !

With a link to the photo (of course)

Thanks Jane,

I have figure out how to view the raw image on Myfoxorlando and blow it up. The papers you are referring to are loose-leaf and do not come from this journal. My guess is that she threw them out at Tony's in June.

 

[JWG]

I'd like to think LE have other evidence to suggest the diary entry is relevant, but the "03" looks Kosher to me.

Whole-heartedly agree. The time warp occurs in the books spine, with dozens of pages torn out.

 

[DianeB]

:clap: :clap: :clap:
(respectfully snipped) Excellent point. ITA w above. Hardly a smoking gun lol.

How do we know the entry was written at the Anthony home? Casey may have had her journal with her at Tony's, and the diary was returned to the house along with the other belongings Lee retrieved.

 

[Micheline]

I do not see why someone would write the year on another page then the entry of June 21. If she would do that for every entry it would mean there could be all sorts of entries from different years at random pages.

That is why I think Casey made the note 'every day is a brand new beginning' in (for example) her school diary and that being the reason why she put up the year on top of the page where she imo repeated it years later.

Looking at what she wrote to Cindy (diary of days) she seemed to have made notes of certain things (for example that were said in movies) to use it later whether in writing or talking.

She also underlined the '03, there would be no need for that since she would know exactly what year it was when she wrote the June 21 entry, so imo the page on the left is her repeating something she noted back in 2003 and repeated it with this entry and added the year. IMO

 

[Truthwillsetufree]

I am not a KC defender or someone thinking there is a conspiracy against her.
I am not part of a lynchmob or a member of a witch hunt nor am I blood thirsty.
It was an observation on my part that this writing in this journal resembled the cursive handwriting of CA more than it resembled the printed handwriting of KC and since both women reside in the same home and the date was "03" either woman could have written this entry in this journal since we are not privy to any other information.
My point is and was that just because something was taken out of the home does not mean it has huge significance, it might, but not always. The media has run with the story correct or incorrect only time will tell.

 

[Truthwillsetufree]

Look at their written statements from the first doc dump.

I did JBean, that is what I compared mine to.:crazy:

*Doing the craaazzyyy eye rollin' thing***

 

[gitana1]

Yes, why in the world would LE be interested in a page from a diary that Casey would have written when she was 16 years old? A junior in high school? Long before any of these events were even a thought in anyones mind? Either this is an explosive piece of evidence or completely nothing. If it was completely nothing, why did it turn up in the doc dumps?

Because the media wanted to highlight it and the prosecution does not mind if they do. This kind of thing harms casey whether it is accurate or not and whether or not it is used at trial.
It would be in the doc dumps because anything subpoenaed would be handed over to the defense.
It may have been photographed initially because it looked interesting to the investigators and they would be really blowing it if they did not at least examine such potential evidence.
Finally, have you all see all the things that were photographed? Bags of trash, debris by the site where Caylee's body was found, empty booze bottles, 9 pairs of shoes, several pairs of shorts? Not all of that will be usable evidence. In this kind of subpoena situation, you sweep through and grab anything that may be relevant and sort through it later. It's a fishing expedition.
Look, it would be the icing on the cake if this diary was from June 21, 2008 and written by casey. But, we don't need it. I think we have more than enough to win a conviction. casey's actions speak for themselves, as well as decomp smell, internet searches for cholorform, missing kids and neck breaking, significant traces of cholorofrom found in the trunk with evidence of decomp, a fictional nanny-abductor who no one has ever met created by a "mother" who does not seem in the least perturbed by the disappearance of her daughter, a tiny, dead body found yards from the suspect's home, with duct tape around her mouth and a heart sticker on that, which seems to have been placed there about a month before Caylee was reported missing and about a month before casey reports a call from her daughter, said call found to never have taken place, a suspect who coincidentally seems to love heart stickers and heart icons, a family in turmoil, a jealousy issue between suspect and grandmother, a young defendant who feels her life has been limited by the existence of her child, and a mother who not only fails to ever report her child missing, but who actively lies to family and friends about her whereabouts and who then lies to investigators who are trying to find her baby. Really, what more do we need?

 

[Georgia PI]

I have seen the photo and it may look entirely different in reality. The pen could have "skipped" and the 08 could very well look like 03. Photos can be misleading.

"03" is what it states.

 

[evergreen]

zanny is the one who wrote in this book. I just know it. :crazy:

 

[Gypsy Road]

2003 is what it states.

no, it says '03 IIRC

 

[babycat]

I'm not confident that this journal is from 2008. In fact, I think it's from 2003.

BUT, against my own theory, I have to admit to myself that

a) I have journals lots of journals that I have ripped pages from, and started over and

b) I have one this very moment, in my nightstand, with a pen that I keep in my journal, so I have one to write with when the mood strikes me. It's been in my journal for about 3 years...I rarely write in my journal (only three times in the last year) but hey, I have to admit to myself that it's in there.

I guess it is possible that she just came across this journal, decided to reuse it, and had a pen already stuck in the pages.

Also, I wouldn't put it past Cindy to have ripped some pages from the diary, though I don't think this is the case. Mainly because she would have ripped this one, too- very telling.

Anyway, I still feel like this entry is from 2003, but I hope LE/prosecution have evidence to prove otherwise, if they plan on using this.

Just mt two cents.

 

[Georgia PI]

no, it says '03 IIRC

Yes I know same as 2003, but I went back and corrected my statement.

However, if you look real close it appears to have pages torn out.

 

[kiki the parrot]

I'd like to think LE have other evidence to suggest the diary entry is relevant, but the "03" looks Kosher to me.

THANK U HP... you'd almost have to have doublevision and a mirror to mistake that 3 for an 8 (would the poster be kind enough to repost the perfectly clear '03). Of course it could always be cropped out altogether, as others have done...lol.

Whole-heartedly agree. The time warp occurs in the books spine, with dozens of pages torn out.

N/k... up to as many as 1,825 days' worth eh? LOLOL... JMO :blowkiss:

 

[mom4321]

Yes, why in the world would LE be interested in a page from a diary that Casey would have written when she was 16 years old? A junior in high school? Long before any of these events were even a thought in anyones mind? Either this is an explosive piece of evidence or completely nothing. If it was completely nothing, why did it turn up in the doc dumps?

shes been known to fake emails so shes capable of putting a fake date on the dairy as well.

 

[DianeB]

I am not a KC defender or someone thinking there is a conspiracy against her.
I am not part of a lynchmob or a member of a witch hunt nor am I blood thirsty.
It was an observation on my part that this writing in this journal resembled the cursive handwriting of CA more than it resembled the printed handwriting of KC and since both women reside in the same home and the date was "03" either woman could have written this entry in this journal since we are not privy to any other information.
My point is and was that just because something was taken out of the home does not mean it has huge significance, it might, but not always. The media has run with the story correct or incorrect only time will tell.

I just looked at the handwritten statements from both Casey and Cindy and compared them to the handwriting in the journal, and I agree with you - the journal handwriting does look more like Cindy's hand than it does Casey's (allowing for the fact that the LE statements were made during a period of great stress).

One thing I noticed is the way in which Cindy's letter 's' at the head of a word is shaped (almost like a figure 8) and connected to the next letter, whether it is a 't' or an 'h'. Casey doesn't connect the letters nearly as much as Cindy. Having said that, the shape of certain letters - particularly the wide lowercase 'h' - matches Casey's handwriting more than it does Cindy's.

Take a look. Casey's written statement is on p. 29, and Cindy's is on p. 34.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/media/acrobat/2008-08/41844520.pdf

The close-up photo of the journal page is here.
http://www.wftv.com/_blank/18740990/detail.html

 

[kiki the parrot]

How will you feel if this is from 2008? Is it valuable then?

Yes of course if it ever could be proven at trial that this were the case, then by all means it most certainly would be relevant... were it written five days after, as opposed to five years before, her daughter's death. Big difference! JMO
ETA If it read 08, it would place statements into suddenly ominous context but that requires alteration be proven.

arrot:

 

[Gypsy Road]

shes been known to fake emails so shes capable of putting a fake date on the dairy as well.

Also, in this doc dump Annie states that Cindy got on line using KC's password and sent emails from KC's acct - signing KC's name. Just saying!

eta - sorry...I got goofed up. Thought you were talking about Cindy, not KC, but Cindy DID impersonate KC in emails.