Caylee Anthony 3 year old General discussion #96

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #161
I don't think he came across so much as "Casey bashing." I've never heard of this guy until he stuck/got stuck in the middle of this case. I think I'm going to refrain from forming an opinion of him just yet. He strikes me more that he just has one of those brash attitudes that some people don't know how to take. Not sure just yet. Who knows, if this guy hammers her hard for answers....maybe, just maybe, since separating the lies from the truth really IS his business...he just might find out what happened to Caylee where everyone else has failed. Here's hoping. I'm willing to give him a "whack at it."

Thats whats so funny to me because quite honestly Casey lawyer wont let that happen. Not that I think Casey would ever tell the truth anyway. I honestly think this women couldnt tell the truth if her life depended on it. I been racking my brain all night about this.Not that i havent done that sinse the whole thing began.I hope to the lord Im wrong but I still believe Casey did this and it sure as heck wasnt a accident. We keep hearing how lieing doesnt make you a murder but the truth is its not just the lieing that makes her look like she has something to do with it. Its waiting over 31 days to report it. I mean my gosh would this women even reported it if it wasnt for the GP. I honestly dont think she would.I look into to this womens eyes in the court room and I see a person with no soul no regret and no remorrse or emotion. The only time she cried is when they said she wasnt getting out. If this sweet angel isnt her any more it wasnt a accident and no way will i ever think differently. This whole story breaks my heart and I just want them to get off there arses and find that sweet little girl.
 
  • #162
There you go. That is why Cindy washing the pants should not be considered an attempt to coverup evidence. If the car wasn't evidence at the time, then the pants weren't either.

ETA: But I have to say if there was astrong decomp smell coming from the basement and patsy reported it on her 911 call, would the investigation have been any differnt?

Yes because it would had led them to the body in all probability before police even got there, certainly very quickly upon their arrival.
 
  • #163
Maybe the 911 operator didn't relay that Cindy said ........
IMO
 
  • #164
But Cindy didn't tell them about the pants being in the car until much later. The pants which, by George's description, are the one LE thinks Casey was wearing the last time anyone saw her with Caylee.
I think she told the responding officers about the pants and they cared about that about as much as they cared about the car.
I don't think it was until she told the detectives did it get any attention whatsoever.
 
  • #165
I went around about this last night. I agree with you.
The rebutt is that they were treating it as a missing persons case. If that is true then Cindy washing the pants was clearly not a problem, because the overall investigation was about a missing girl not a murdered girl.

I mean it has been explained here ad nauseum that a decomp smell is something none of us will ever forget and it is distinct. So if the police thought the smell was so bad and they had been told by Cindy herself that it smelled of decomp, why didn;t they act on that?
IMO, it is because it just wasn't their mo and the odor was not enough to pique their investigative skills.

Either the stench was important or it wasn't. I think if it really was a decomp smell then LE really blew it by not asking George and Cindy if they could take the car and look for clues.

Something stinks about the stink.

We cannot have it both ways. We cannot be mad at Cindy for washing pants without being mad at LE for not searching the car.
If the pants were evidence, then the car was evidence.

IMO No one cared about the car or the pants on 7/15.


wow... excellent post
 
  • #166
Yes because it would had led them to the body in all probability before police even got there, certainly very quickly upon their arrival.
Well then why didn;t the responding officers react or respond to the decomp smell in the car?
I think the dogs were brought out 2 days(?) later. When was the car impounded? Did they ask George and Cindy if they could search the car and take it in?
 
  • #167
From the search warrant:

"(Aug 4th) While discussing the recovery of Casey's white car it was discovered that Cynthia had removed items from the car prior to law enforcement being contacted. Cythia explained that she had removed a pair of grey dress slacks from the back sear area of the car....According to Cynthia she removed the pants and washed them due to the fact that they smelled like the car..."

Now, come on. This lady is married to a former cop. Surely she knows some basic rules of evidence.
 
  • #168
Well then why didn;t the responding officers react or respond to the decomp smell in the car?
I think the dogs were brought out 2 days(?) later. When was the car impounded? Did they ask George and Cindy if they could search the car and take it in?

But, as Carrington said, maybe the alerting officers weren't told of the smell?
 
  • #169
  • #170
From the arrest warrant:

"(Aug 4th) While discussing the recovery of Casey's white car it was discovered that Cynthia had removed items from the car prior to law enforcement being contacted. Cythia explained that she had removed a pair of grey dress slacks from the back sear area of the car....According to Cynthia she removed the pants and washed them due to the fact that they smelled like the car..."

Now, come on. This lady is married to a former cop. Surely she knows some basic rules of evidence.
See my previous post. if the car was not important and not considered evidence on the 15th then why oh why would the pants be?
We can't have it both ways!
IMO no responding officer gave a hoot about the car or the pants.
 
  • #171
George and Cindy have done exactly what they planned.....confuse, distract and cover for Casey. I still maintain that there is a very good reason that Caylee wasn't reported missing for 31 days.....and it's worked out, perfectly. So far.
 
  • #172
It was in the 911 call!

I have a scanner,and when I have called the police,and listen to the scanner the dispatching officer does not always relay the same information to the responding officer.
 
  • #173
From the search warrant:

"(Aug 4th) While discussing the recovery of Casey's white car it was discovered that Cynthia had removed items from the car prior to law enforcement being contacted. Cythia explained that she had removed a pair of grey dress slacks from the back sear area of the car....According to Cynthia she removed the pants and washed them due to the fact that they smelled like the car..."

Now, come on. This lady is married to a former cop. Surely she knows some basic rules of evidence.
Well, I think that's kind of proof that she washed the pants BEFORE she contacted the police. Am I missing something here?
 
  • #174
It was in the 911 call!

Which isn't heard by the officers....dispatch would have had to relay the info about the odor in the car.....and, we don't know if dispatch did. Besides, Cindy says now that she only said what she said to get a quick response.
 
  • #175
  • #176
But, as Carrington said, maybe the alerting officers weren't told of the smell?


That would be a serious error then! She said the car smelled like a dead body! In any investigation concerning a crime... THAT should be reported.
 
  • #177
I think she told the responding officers about the pants and they cared about that about as much as they cared about the car.
I don't think it was until she told the detectives did it get any attention whatsoever.

Even if the car smelled like a dead body as Cindy said LE had to cover this as a missing person first. If LE would of done it without looking into what Casey was saying first all the evidents LE collected would of been thrown out of court. There is certain protocols they have to follow. Even if LE thought she was guilty of something from the begining which i dont think they did at first.They did it all by the book and the way it should be done. It sucks but they did it the way it should of been followed by the law.
 
  • #178
I have to run, but is what I heard on the radio...that a friend of Baez's put him in touch with the bounty hunter correct? All, I can say is "oye!"
 
  • #179
I have a scanner,and when I have called the police,and listen to the scanner the dispatching officer does not always relay the same information to the responding officer.

Thank you!
 
  • #180
Maybe the 911 operator didn't relay that Cindy said ........
IMO
Carrington...if the smell was so bad, how could the officers not noticed it? and report of a dead body smell on a 911 call not reported to the officers? IF that were the case, then makes it look like LE really blew it.
So, either LE blew it or the smell was not that big of a deal.
Either which way if the car wasn't important, then the pants weren't important. That is why I think Cindy told the repsonding officers about the pants an they didn;t care at all.
The detectives on the 4th cared though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
151
Guests online
2,682
Total visitors
2,833

Forum statistics

Threads
632,132
Messages
18,622,552
Members
243,031
Latest member
beccabelle70
Back
Top