gardenhart
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2008
- Messages
- 814
- Reaction score
- 0
Re bolded by me: This is another awfully difficult subject to address, let alone try to sort out, because I believe beyond any doubt that Cindy adored, loved, treasured, and took care of Caylee's every need. In short, Cindy accepted full responsibility for Caylee's well-being except for making sure that Caylee's caregiver, KC, was a fit and reliable woman.
Cindy knew KC had a volatile temper, she knew KC was a liar, and a thief, and a "sociopath," and she knew Casey didn't want to accept responsibility for Caylee. Could there be a worse candidate to knowingly entrust with a toddler's daily care--other than a convicted murderer or pedophile?
Cindy regarded herself, correctly, as being "in charge" of Caylee's wellbeing, and yet she knew all of KC's shortcomings. She knew KC lied about working, she knew KC was so broke that she needed to steal $4,000, and yet, Cindy chose to believe for almost 2 years, that KC had actually employed a suitable "nanny" who looked after Caylee while KC wasn't working?
Given all of that, and given Cindy's very assertive personality, it is inconceivable that neither she nor George bothered to follow KC now and then, to make certain KC was telling the truth--which they knew she rarely did--so they could be sure that Caylee was safe and secure.
I will never understand why Cindy didn't feel any need to do that. For that matter, knowing what I do about Cindy, I cannot conceive of her not insisting on meeting "the nanny" early on. It just doesn't "jive" with her personality to me, let alone her very real commitment to Caylee.
I guess, to sum it all up, I dunno. I dunno. I wish someone with expertise and knowledge could explain it to all of us.
ETA: I have no thoughts about whether or not there's anything significant in those photos, and like many others here, my children--especially my son--was a walking, talking magnet for bruises, bumps and cuts, when he was young. I used to tear my hair out. LOL
It's been my experience than many people who spoil their children and are smothering parents also tend to ignore them a lot - to be distant and uninvolved. Am I making sense? Like the child isn't really a person to them. Or perhaps it's easier to just give the child what they want all the time to shut them up.
At any rate, I suspect that Cindy really didn't adore, treasure or take care of Caylee's every need. It certainly looks like she resented having the child dumped on her so much. But more than that, I suspect that while she may have paid the bills for Caylee, that the poor baby didn't get any real, effective, loving attention from either her mother or her grandmother.
I hope I'm wrong, but it makes the lack of action both to ensure that Casey was being truthful and responsible and when Caylee disappeared make more sense.