That yes would be regarding the truth serum comment. Still figuring this format out, sorry!!
LOL, don't feel like the lone stranger, :waitasec: me too.

That yes would be regarding the truth serum comment. Still figuring this format out, sorry!!
That Georgia article said this:
Originally, investigators believed the site could have been connected to the disappearance of Kristi Cornwell, etc.
Wonder what would've lead them to think that might be?
Yes he answered it. It is on the previous page (7).
Why is this forum not allowing me to reply with a quote? It's making things difficult and I don't do difficult well.
Yes he answered it. It is on the previous page (7).
Why is this forum not allowing me to reply with a quote? It's making things difficult and I don't do difficult well.
Thanks. I could not log in last night. Every time I did it welcomed me but then nothing. Are we not allowed to copy & paste on this board? Was thinking maybe that's what disabled me because it was right after I did that that I couldn't get back on. Won't do that again.
No Wolfscratch did not say either way but I took it to be he was on foot.
The thing I told you to re-read was my comment about the light on the truck. I said it would normally be removed when not in use so does that mean it was in use therefore why it was on there? That truck. Something bugs me about that truck. Why do you think the picture of it was from a different day? Is that common knowledge and I missed it?
Thinking about this 'associates' theory. Very very possible but then why would they not say so? Maybe not in the beginning but at least now. One would think that would be a plus for law enforcement to announce that they have others in custody. Does not make sense to keep that to themselves. And if so what would be the logic there? It's all so confusing. Now I understand why the discussion on this case has endured.
I had read all those blackened out pages last night from the Cheryl Dunlap case. Very interesting to say the least. Gee could they spare the info? How generous of them.
Was wondering why you felt that if Cheryl D was there at the bank she wasn't driven there. Would you explain what you meant? Thanx. Just thinking that Meredith Emerson didn't drive when he tried to use her card but I find what he has offered in that case iffy at best.